Pub Date : 2023-10-12DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2023.2258022
Graham Ferris
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 At p vii.2 The crucial chapter is: 14 Professionalism, and the detailed evidence and argument of abuse are at pp 361–68.3 William M Sullivan and others, Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profession of Law (Jossey-Bass 2007) 21.
{"title":"Lawyers and the rule of law <b>Lawyers and the rule of law</b> , by Andrew Boon, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2022, 573 pp., £90 (hardback), ISBN 978-1-50992-521-6","authors":"Graham Ferris","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2258022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2258022","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 At p vii.2 The crucial chapter is: 14 Professionalism, and the detailed evidence and argument of abuse are at pp 361–68.3 William M Sullivan and others, Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profession of Law (Jossey-Bass 2007) 21.","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136012832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-10DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2023.2258021
Eti Best Herbert, Ngozi Chinwa Ole
ABSTRACTNigeria operates a binate regulatory system for legal education under the regulatory control of the National Universities Commission (NUC) and the Council of Legal Education (CLE), which regulate the law faculties of universities and the Nigerian Law School respectively. Both regulatory bodies carry out periodic visitation exercises to confer accreditation status on the law faculties accordingly. Against the standards of the UK Better Regulation Principles (BRP) of proportionality, accountability, consistency, transparency and targeting, this paper examined the effectiveness of the NUC and CLE in exercising their regulatory functions in the regulation of legal education. In its assessment, this paper finds that the binate system falls short of the BRP. Its sanction of withdrawal of accreditation is rather extreme and not fit for instances of minor malfeasance. The activities of the binate regulatory bodies are left unsupervised and the court usually refrains from intervention. Hence, among other things, this paper suggests joint action of both bodies in carrying out accreditation exercises, which will ensure consistency and save costs. The court should also intervene in appropriate instances to prevent abuse of regulatory powers.KEYWORDS: Legal educationaccreditationBetter Regulation PrinciplesNational Universities CommissionCouncil of Legal Education Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 Charles A Riedl, “The Proper Place and Function of the Lawyer in the Society” (1951) 35 Marquette Law Review 1, 1.2 ibid. See Andras Sajo, “The Role of Lawyers in Social Change: Hungary” (1993) 25 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 137, 137.3 Stan D Ross, “The Role of Lawyers in Society” (1976) 48(1) The Australian Quarterly 61, 66.4 United Nations, “Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers” (1990) accessed 16 April 2023.5 Alex de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (G. Dearburn & Co. 1838).6 Okechukwu Oko, “The Lawyer’s Role in a Contemporary Democracy, Promoting the Rule of Law, Lawyers in Fragile Democracies and the Challenges of Democratic Consolidation: The Nigerian Experience” (2009) 77 Fordham Law Review 1295, 1297.7 Felicia Eimunjeze, “Achieving Excellence in the Legal Profession in a Globalized World: Imperatives for Developing Economies” (2015) 5 Journal of Sustainable Development and Policy 198, 198.8 Idem Udosen Jacob and Halimat Adeniran, “Challenges of Legal Education in Nigeria and the Effects on National Development” (2019) 6(10) International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 90, 90. See also Bagoni A Bukar, “Legal Education and Challenges of Contemporary Developments in Nigeria” (2014) 20 International Journal of Clinical Legal Education 593.9 Jonathan O Fabunmi and Ademola O Popoola, “Legal Education in Nigeria: Problems and Prospects” (1990) 23 Verfassung und Recht in Üb
尼日利亚在国家大学委员会(NUC)和法律教育委员会(CLE)的监管下,对法律教育实行双重监管制度,分别对大学和尼日利亚法学院的法学院进行监管。两个规管机构定期进行访问,以授予法学院相应的认可地位。本文以英国更好的监管原则(BRP)的比例性、问责性、一致性、透明度和针对性的标准为依据,考察了国家法律委员会和法律教育委员会在法律教育监管中行使其监管职能的有效性。在评估中,本文发现二元系统不符合BRP。其撤销认证的制裁相当极端,不适合轻微渎职的情况。这两个管理机构的活动不受监督,法院通常不进行干预。因此,除其他事项外,本文件建议两个机构在进行认证工作时采取联合行动,以确保一致性和节省费用。法院还应在适当情况下进行干预,以防止滥用监管权力。关键词:法学教育鉴定;更好的监管原则;国家大学委员会;注1 Charles A . Riedl,“律师在社会中的适当地位和功能”(1951)35 Marquette Law Review 1, 1.2同上。参见Andras Sajo,“律师在社会变革中的作用”。6.匈牙利”(1993)25 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 137, 137.3 Stan D Ross,“律师在社会中的作用”(1976)48(1)澳大利亚季刊61,66.4联合国,“律师作用的基本原则”(1990)2023年4月16日访问Okechukwu Oko,“律师在当代民主中的角色,促进法治,脆弱民主国家的律师和民主巩固的挑战:尼日利亚的经验”(2009),《福特汉姆法律评论》第1295期,1297.7页。“发展中经济体的必要性”(2015)5“可持续发展与政策研究”(2015),“尼日利亚法律教育的挑战及其对国家发展的影响”(2019)6(10)。参见Bagoni A Bukar,“尼日利亚的法律教育:问题与展望”(1990)23 Verfassung und Recht, Übersee 34.10同上。11 Ndubuisi J Madubuike-Ekwe,“尼日利亚法律教育的挑战与展望”(2014)20国际临床法律教育杂志,593.9《21世纪尼日利亚的法律教育:对内容范式多样性的需求》(2015)《法律、政策与全球化》63.13《教育(国家最低标准与机构建立)法案》第E63章,LFN 2004; 10.14《法律教育(整合)法案》第L10章,LFN 2004, s 1(2).1516 . (n 12)经济合作与发展组织,“改善监管的战略和政策”(2010),2023年2月7日,同上。19罗伯特·鲍德温,马丁·凯夫和马丁·洛奇,“什么是“好”监管?在罗伯特·鲍德温·马丁·凯夫和马丁·洛奇,理解规则:理论,战略和实践(牛津大学出版社2011)58.20特里·哈钦森,“理论研究:研究陪审团”在道恩·沃特金斯和曼迪·伯顿(编辑),法律研究方法(劳特利奇2013)9.21特里·哈钦森和奈杰尔·邓肯,“定义和描述我们所做的:《法学理论研究》(2012)17《迪肯法律评论》(Deakin Law Review) 179, 181.22同上183.23 Oliver TU Onwudinjo等,“公共和私法教科书收藏:法律图书馆的认证问题与必要性”(2015)3 Pinnacle教育研究与发展724,725.24 Oliver Theophine Onwudinjo, Chukwuma Obiora Nwosu,塞浦路斯I Ugwu,“尼日利亚大学法学院的认证问题”;《法律图书馆、法律与法规的必要性》(2014)1172《图书馆哲学与实践》(电子期刊)1,2 - 3.25 Ndubuisi Joseph Madubuike-Ekwe:“尼日利亚法律教育的挑战与前景:综述”(2017)8(1)Nnamdi Azikiwe大学国际法与法理学学报,128,130.26 Moshood B Lawal:《尼日利亚教育史手册》(Macmillan & Co 2008) 30。 76 Nnamdi Onyeka Obiaraeri和Chinyere Obiaraeri,“在Covid-19大流行时代重新思考尼日利亚法律教育的未来”(2022)3《国际法律与临床法律教育杂志》第9期,13.77 awouous Nnaemeka,“委员会指责大学经营未经认证的法律课程威胁法律职业”(the Whistler),2022年8月29日),于2023.1月29日取阅。78同上。
{"title":"A binate regulatory framework for the accreditation of law faculties in Nigerian universities: a necessity or overkill?","authors":"Eti Best Herbert, Ngozi Chinwa Ole","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2258021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2258021","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTNigeria operates a binate regulatory system for legal education under the regulatory control of the National Universities Commission (NUC) and the Council of Legal Education (CLE), which regulate the law faculties of universities and the Nigerian Law School respectively. Both regulatory bodies carry out periodic visitation exercises to confer accreditation status on the law faculties accordingly. Against the standards of the UK Better Regulation Principles (BRP) of proportionality, accountability, consistency, transparency and targeting, this paper examined the effectiveness of the NUC and CLE in exercising their regulatory functions in the regulation of legal education. In its assessment, this paper finds that the binate system falls short of the BRP. Its sanction of withdrawal of accreditation is rather extreme and not fit for instances of minor malfeasance. The activities of the binate regulatory bodies are left unsupervised and the court usually refrains from intervention. Hence, among other things, this paper suggests joint action of both bodies in carrying out accreditation exercises, which will ensure consistency and save costs. The court should also intervene in appropriate instances to prevent abuse of regulatory powers.KEYWORDS: Legal educationaccreditationBetter Regulation PrinciplesNational Universities CommissionCouncil of Legal Education Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 Charles A Riedl, “The Proper Place and Function of the Lawyer in the Society” (1951) 35 Marquette Law Review 1, 1.2 ibid. See Andras Sajo, “The Role of Lawyers in Social Change: Hungary” (1993) 25 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 137, 137.3 Stan D Ross, “The Role of Lawyers in Society” (1976) 48(1) The Australian Quarterly 61, 66.4 United Nations, “Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers” (1990) <www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/UN_Basic_Principles_on_the_Role_of_Lawyers.pdf> accessed 16 April 2023.5 Alex de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (G. Dearburn & Co. 1838).6 Okechukwu Oko, “The Lawyer’s Role in a Contemporary Democracy, Promoting the Rule of Law, Lawyers in Fragile Democracies and the Challenges of Democratic Consolidation: The Nigerian Experience” (2009) 77 Fordham Law Review 1295, 1297.7 Felicia Eimunjeze, “Achieving Excellence in the Legal Profession in a Globalized World: Imperatives for Developing Economies” (2015) 5 Journal of Sustainable Development and Policy 198, 198.8 Idem Udosen Jacob and Halimat Adeniran, “Challenges of Legal Education in Nigeria and the Effects on National Development” (2019) 6(10) International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 90, 90. See also Bagoni A Bukar, “Legal Education and Challenges of Contemporary Developments in Nigeria” (2014) 20 International Journal of Clinical Legal Education 593.9 Jonathan O Fabunmi and Ademola O Popoola, “Legal Education in Nigeria: Problems and Prospects” (1990) 23 Verfassung und Recht in Üb","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136295062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-06DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2023.2258027
Ben Waters
"Getting to maybe: how to excel on law school exams." The Law Teacher, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), pp. 1–2
“或许:如何在法学院考试中脱颖而出。”《法律教师》,提前印刷,第1-2页
{"title":"Getting to maybe: how to excel on law school exams <b>Getting to maybe: how to excel on law school exams</b> , by Richard Michael Fischl and Jeremy R. Paul, Durham, NC, Carolina Academic Press, 2023, 474 pp., $45.00 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-59460-734-9","authors":"Ben Waters","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2258027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2258027","url":null,"abstract":"\"Getting to maybe: how to excel on law school exams.\" The Law Teacher, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), pp. 1–2","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135351476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-03DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2023.2257501
Jenny Y. Chan
ABSTRACTStorytelling is a popular teaching method in legal education. Despite that popularity, research on designing and delivering this method to support different learning outcomes in legal education is limited. Thus, it is the purpose of this article to build a pedagogical framework of storytelling based on current teaching practices. Conventional pedagogy has identified three storytelling approaches: (1) to help students understand legal concepts; (2) to help students learn and remember the theories and techniques about storytelling; and (3) to teach students how to tell their clients’ stories. Based on the analysis of case studies reported by law teachers, this article argues that there are at least two more storytelling approaches. This article aims to classify these storytelling approaches in a five-tier framework. Furthermore, it proposes that applying the flipped classroom method to storytelling helps law teachers teach towards learning outcomes more efficiently and effectively than the conventional approaches.KEYWORDS: Storytellingflipped classroomlearning outcomesteaching method Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Jo A Tyler and Faith Mullen, “Telling Tales in School: Storytelling for Self-Reflection and Pedagogical Improvement in Clinical Legal Education” (2011) 18 Clinical Law Review 283, 295; Stefan H Krieger and Serge A Martinez, “A Tale of Election Day 2008: Teaching Storytelling through Repeated Experiences” (2010) 16 Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute 117; Nancy Levit, “Legal Storytelling: The Theory and the Practice – Reflective Writing across the Curriculum” (2009) 15 Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute 253, 255. Cf J Christopher Rideout, “Applied Legal Storytelling: An Updated Bibliography” (2021) 18 JALWD 221, 224: the bibliography lists articles on Applied Legal Storytelling from 2007 to 2020.2 Ruth Anne Robbins, “An Introduction to Applied Storytelling and to This Symposium” (2008) 14 Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute 3, 12. Cf the qualitative and action research conducted by Tyler and Mullen (n 1) on clinical legal education.3 Cf Donna M Steslow and Carolyn Gardner, “More than One Way to Tell a Story: Integrating Storytelling into Your Law Course” (2011) 28 Journal of Legal Studies Education 249, 258; Kristen E Murray, “Persuasion: An Updated Bibliography” (2021) 18 Legal Communication and Rhetoric: JALWD 205.4 Anthony G Amsterdam and Jerome Bruner, “On Narrative” in Minding the Law (Harvard University Press 2000) 110. Cf Peter Brooks and Paul Gewirtz (eds), Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law (Yale UP 1998); James Boyd White, The Legal Imagination (45th anniversary edn 2018, Aspen 1985); Michael Hanne and Robert Weisberg, Narrative and Metaphor in the Law (Cambridge UP 2018).5 Krieger and Martinez (n 1) 146.6 Kate Green, Hilary Lim and Jeremy Roche, “The Indeterminate Province: Storytellin
69 Franzese (n 24) 705.70 Cf Krieger and Martinez (n 1) 146;Grose (n 7) 41.71 Krieger and Martinez (n 1) 146.72 Franzese (n 24) 705.73 Krieger and Martinez (n 1) 148.74 Grose (n 7) 41;Brian J Foley和Ruth Anne Robbins,“小说101:律师如何使用小说写作技巧写出有说服力的事实章节的入门”(2001)32 Rutgers Law Journal 459, 461:“建议学生‘讲故事’”。Cf泰勒和马伦(n 1) 297.75格罗斯(n 7) 49;Blaustone (n 34) 454.76 Cf grosse (n 7) 49.77 grosse (n 7) 56;幸福(27)265;Blaustone (n 34) 460;Meyer (n 60) 135;麦克卢格(n 46) 823;Fisher (n 32) 21;Wilcox (n 26) 219.78 Blaustone (n 34) 454, 459;格罗斯(n 7) 59;凯普林(n 68) 891;麦克卢格(n 46) 833;Watkins and Guihen (n 42) 166;Wolff (n 39) Abrams (n 39) Roebuck, Westcott和Thiriet (n 44) 43.81 Christian (n 25) 28-29.82 Blissenden (n 27) 266.83 Abrams (n 39) 252:“时间限制了可以深入考虑的案例数量”。Cf Blaustone (n 34) 459:“我将回顾叙述限制在每次不超过8或10分钟”。84 . Crumbley and Smith (n 40) 293:“耗时”Wolff and Chan (n 10) 9.85,同上13。另见Lemmer (n 10) 463.86 Wolff and Chan (n 10) 23-24;Davis, Neary和Vaughn (n 10) 13.87 Cf乔安妮·克拉夫和吉莉安·W·肖特,“评估基于问题的学习作为一种吸引一年级法律学生的方法的有效性”(2015)49《法律教师》277,289.88切特·梅耶斯和托马斯·B·琼斯,“什么是主动学习及其工作原理”促进主动学习:大学课堂策略(乔西-巴斯1993)19.89克里斯蒂娜·拉塞尔,“主动与被动学习:有什么区别?(研究生教育计划,2021年6月2日)www.graduateprogram.org/2021/06/active-vs-passive-learning-whats-the-difference/访问2023.9月25日Wolff和Chan (n 10) 25.91同上。92同上29;Patricia McKellar和Paul Maharg,《虚拟学习环境:床下盒子的替代品》(2005)39 The Law Teacher 43, 44.93 Wolff and Chan (n 10) 29.94同上25.95 Wolff and Chan (n 10) 99.96同上104-05.97 Marlene Le Brun和Richard Johnstone, The Quiet (R)evolution:改善学生的法律学习(The Law Book Company Limited 1994) 260;沃尔夫和陈(n 10) 65.98沃尔夫和陈(n 10) 65。Cf Davis, Neary and Vaughn (n 10) 14;McKellar and Maharg (1992) 48;Upchurch (n 10) 62;爱尔兰(n 10) 150.99休伊特(n 10)。Robert G . Vaughn,“模拟在一年级民事诉讼课程中的应用”(1995)45法学教育杂志44,484;Ine van Haaren - Dresens,“学生作为立法者:通过协作电子学习模拟议会法案的制定”(2004)38《法律教师》第202期,第212页;康慧,“在法律诊所案例轮转中使用角色扮演和访谈模式来教授基本法律技能并最大限度地提高有意义的参与”(2012)19临床法律评论207,247.104 Blaustone (n 34) 454.105 Ruth Dann,“评估作为学习:模糊评估与理论、政策和实践学习的界限”(2014)21(2)教育评估。原则、政策与实践
{"title":"Storytelling: a five-tier framework and the flipped classroom approach","authors":"Jenny Y. Chan","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2257501","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2257501","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTStorytelling is a popular teaching method in legal education. Despite that popularity, research on designing and delivering this method to support different learning outcomes in legal education is limited. Thus, it is the purpose of this article to build a pedagogical framework of storytelling based on current teaching practices. Conventional pedagogy has identified three storytelling approaches: (1) to help students understand legal concepts; (2) to help students learn and remember the theories and techniques about storytelling; and (3) to teach students how to tell their clients’ stories. Based on the analysis of case studies reported by law teachers, this article argues that there are at least two more storytelling approaches. This article aims to classify these storytelling approaches in a five-tier framework. Furthermore, it proposes that applying the flipped classroom method to storytelling helps law teachers teach towards learning outcomes more efficiently and effectively than the conventional approaches.KEYWORDS: Storytellingflipped classroomlearning outcomesteaching method Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Jo A Tyler and Faith Mullen, “Telling Tales in School: Storytelling for Self-Reflection and Pedagogical Improvement in Clinical Legal Education” (2011) 18 Clinical Law Review 283, 295; Stefan H Krieger and Serge A Martinez, “A Tale of Election Day 2008: Teaching Storytelling through Repeated Experiences” (2010) 16 Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute 117; Nancy Levit, “Legal Storytelling: The Theory and the Practice – Reflective Writing across the Curriculum” (2009) 15 Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute 253, 255. Cf J Christopher Rideout, “Applied Legal Storytelling: An Updated Bibliography” (2021) 18 JALWD 221, 224: the bibliography lists articles on Applied Legal Storytelling from 2007 to 2020.2 Ruth Anne Robbins, “An Introduction to Applied Storytelling and to This Symposium” (2008) 14 Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute 3, 12. Cf the qualitative and action research conducted by Tyler and Mullen (n 1) on clinical legal education.3 Cf Donna M Steslow and Carolyn Gardner, “More than One Way to Tell a Story: Integrating Storytelling into Your Law Course” (2011) 28 Journal of Legal Studies Education 249, 258; Kristen E Murray, “Persuasion: An Updated Bibliography” (2021) 18 Legal Communication and Rhetoric: JALWD 205.4 Anthony G Amsterdam and Jerome Bruner, “On Narrative” in Minding the Law (Harvard University Press 2000) 110. Cf Peter Brooks and Paul Gewirtz (eds), Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law (Yale UP 1998); James Boyd White, The Legal Imagination (45th anniversary edn 2018, Aspen 1985); Michael Hanne and Robert Weisberg, Narrative and Metaphor in the Law (Cambridge UP 2018).5 Krieger and Martinez (n 1) 146.6 Kate Green, Hilary Lim and Jeremy Roche, “The Indeterminate Province: Storytellin","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135696434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-03DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2023.2258023
Jenny Y. Chan
ABSTRACTOutcome-based education (OBE) is a pedagogical approach that suggests that educators should organise every component in a curriculum so that learners achieve predetermined learning outcomes upon completion of their learning process. The focus of OBE is on teaching knowledge and skills that students can attain upon the completion of their formal learning process. Because of its pedagogical impact, institutions worldwide are embracing OBE as a measure of quality assurance of legal education. However, having a set of outcomes is only the first step towards implementing OBE. To fully implement OBE, teachers need to understand and adopt the underlying principles of OBE in their teaching. This article aims to explore the implementation of OBE via an empirical research study in Hong Kong. It concludes that the current institutional policy in Hong Kong allows law teachers to adopt a lukewarm attitude towards OBE. Their attitudes towards OBE can be categorised into five groups, ie loyal followers, incidental followers, lukewarm followers, pretenders and deniers.KEYWORDS: Outcome-based education (OBE)academic freedomlegal educationteaching practicesbest practices Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 William G Spady, Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers (American Association of School Administrators 1994) accessed 11 May 2023.2 Tuning Association, “Tuning-Ahelo Conceptual Framework of Expected and Desired Learning Outcomes in Economics” (OECD, 23 June 2009) 2 accessed 11 May 2023.3 Spady (n 1) 3.4 Maureen Tam, “Outcomes-Based Approach to Quality Assessment and Curriculum Improvement in Higher Education” (2014) 22 Qual Assur Educ 158, 159; Peter Ewell, “Building Academic Cultures of Evidence: A Perspective on Learning Outcomes in Higher Education” (Paper presented at the Symposium of the Hong Kong University Grants Committee on Quality Education, Quality Outcomes – The Way Forward for Hong Kong, June 2008) 1 accessed 11 May 2023.5 UGC accessed 11 May 2023.6 UGC, “Symposium on Outcome-Based Approaches in Student Learning: ‘Quality Education, Quality Outcomes: The Way Forward for Hong Kong’” (18 June 2008) accessed 11 May 2023.7 Quality Assurance Council, “Audit Manual Second Audit Cycle” (22 October 2018) 4 accessed 11 May 2023.8 HKU, Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre (TaLiC) (formerly known as the Centre for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) all accessed 23 September 2023.9 TaLiC, “A Short Guide to Outcomes-Based Approaches to Student Learning”
摘要基于结果的教育(OBE)是一种教学方法,它建议教育者组织课程中的每个组成部分,以便学习者在完成学习过程后达到预定的学习结果。OBE的重点是教授学生在完成正式学习过程后可以获得的知识和技能。由于其在教学上的影响,世界各地的机构都在接受OBE作为法律教育质量保证的衡量标准。然而,拥有一组结果只是实现OBE的第一步。要全面实施脱体教学,教师需要在教学中理解并运用脱体教学的基本原则。本文旨在通过实证研究,探讨在香港实施外经贸的问题。报告的结论是,香港现行的制度政策使得法律教师对脱教持不温不火的态度。他们对出窍的态度可以分为五类,即忠诚追随者、偶然追随者、不冷不热追随者、伪装者和否认者。关键词:成果教育(OBE)学术自由法律教育教学实践最佳实践披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1 William G Spady,基于结果的教育:关键问题和答案(美国学校管理人员协会1994年)访问2022.3 5月11日调校协会,“调校-经济学中预期和期望学习成果的概念框架”(经合组织,2009年6月23日)2访问2022.3 Spady (n 1) 3.4 Maureen Tam,“基于结果的方法在高等教育中进行质量评估和课程改进”(2014年)22 Qual Assur Educ 158, 159;Peter Ewell,“建立以证据为基础的学术文化:高等教育学习成果的视角”(在香港大学教育资助委员会优质教育研讨会上发表的论文,“优质成果-香港未来路向”,2008年6月)1 - 2023.5教资会访问2023.6教资会,“以成果为本的学生学习方法研讨会:优质教育,优质成果:《香港未来路向》(2008年6月18日)于2023年5月11日阅览;《质素保证局审核手册第二审核周期》(2018年10月22日)于2023年5月11日阅览;《教与学创新中心》(前称促进教与学中心)于2023年9月23日阅览;《以成果为本的学生学习方法简介》于2023年9月21日阅览;TED,“基于成果的教与学(OBTL)”2023年5月11日访问;中大,“OBA@CUHK”浏览2023.5月11日Jean A King和Karen M Evans,“我们能实现成果教育吗?”(1991)《教育领导》73,74.11同上;Timothy G Hoffman,“基于结果的教育实践,标准和因素的检查,加强了OBE的实施”(博士论文,爱荷华州立大学1996)2.12 Spady (n 1).13霍夫曼(n 11) 15.14克里夫·马尔科姆,“结果为本的教育有不同的形式”,见乔纳森·D·詹森和帕姆·克里斯蒂(编),《改变课程:南非结果为本教育研究》(Juta and Company Ltd 1999) 77, 79.15同上78;参见Gwennis McNeir,“基于结果的教育:结构调整的工具”(1993)36(8),OSSC公报4,2023年5月11日访问。McNeir解释说,Lewis Rhodes将Deming的原则应用于OBE。16 Ewell (n 4) 1.17 ibid 8.18 Cf McNeir (n 15) 5,“OBE的主要倡导者和开发者”;King and Evans (n 10) 73,“OBE发展的原动力”;Hoffman (n 11) 14,“最常用”;Roy Killen,“基于结果的教育:原则和可能性”(未发表的手稿,纽卡斯尔大学,2000)2访问2023年5月11日,“世界权威的OBE”,第19页Spady (n 1) 1.20同上9.21同上1.22同上81.23同上89.24同上25同上90.26同上92,“在大多数州,几乎没有承认或证据表明[OBE原则]存在”基伦(第18期)2.28斯帕迪(第1期)93.29同上,30斯帕迪(第1期)10.31同上,11.32同上,12.33同上,14.34同上,16.35同上,18.36同上,18.37约翰·比格斯和凯瑟琳·唐,《大学质量学习的教学》(第四版,高等教育与高等教育学院和开放大学出版社2011年),2023.5月11日查阅,同上,97-110.39同上,119.40同上,98.41同上,105.42同上,43同上,106.44同上,131.45罗伊·斯图基等人,法律教育的最佳实践:远景和路线图(临床法律教育协会2007)访问2023.46 5月11日同上28.47同上121.48同上152.49同上171.50同上198.51同上35.52同上53同上36.54同上40.55同上95.56同上96.57同上97.58同上88.59同上127.60同上117.61同上190.62同上191.63同上181.64同上199.65同上198.66临床法律评论;法学教育评论;法学教育杂志;法律教师。67 1994-2019。 [8]参见郭志强,“基于结果的教育:一门课一门课的遗产与信托的实验”(2012)[J];“基于结果的法学教育的新范式”(2000)[j]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]、[c]。4.71 1月19日批准获得了2019.72的法律教师调查的时候是98在港大,42在接受和44 CUHK.73看到2.4.74吉姆麦凯南部分的讨论中,“还是教育的一些限制”(1993)8 JCS 343.75苏珊•H•邓肯“新认证标准来法学院附近你——你需要知道的关于学习的结果和评估”(2010)16 605年法律写作,609;李晓明,“法律教育中使用结果的十种关注”(2012)[j] .中国法律教育,第6卷第1期Maranville, O 'Neill and Plumb (n 68) 1020.78见2.2节;参考文献:Spady (n 1) 93.79 Cf Steven Friedland,“法学院课程的成果与所有权概念”(2012)38 Wm Mitchell L Rev 947, 965.80 Cf John Bell,“法律课程中的关键技能与自我评估”(2000)34 Law Teacher 175,182.81 Cf Duncan (n 75) 609;Lynch (n 75) 990.82 Section 2.2;Spady (n . 1) 1.83 Stuckey和其他人(n . 45).84见2.2节;参考Gary Yukl, Helen Kim和Cecilia M Falbe,“影响结果的前因”(1996)81应用心理学杂志309,310.86同上。将法律技术融入法律教育”(2021)55法律教师392,393.88布赖恩·道尔顿,“认识法律教育”(高于法律)访问2023.5月11日Cf理查德·萨斯金德,“人工智能,工作和‘结果思维’”(2018)英国法学Rev 30,31.90 Cf理查德·萨斯金德,“明天的律师”(2014)81 Def Couns J 327,331.91亚历克斯·Nicholson,“法律学位的价值:第二部分:来自英国提供商的视角”(2021)55法律教师21,257。
{"title":"Law teachers’ adoption and acceptance of OBE: a case study of Hong Kong","authors":"Jenny Y. Chan","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2258023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2258023","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTOutcome-based education (OBE) is a pedagogical approach that suggests that educators should organise every component in a curriculum so that learners achieve predetermined learning outcomes upon completion of their learning process. The focus of OBE is on teaching knowledge and skills that students can attain upon the completion of their formal learning process. Because of its pedagogical impact, institutions worldwide are embracing OBE as a measure of quality assurance of legal education. However, having a set of outcomes is only the first step towards implementing OBE. To fully implement OBE, teachers need to understand and adopt the underlying principles of OBE in their teaching. This article aims to explore the implementation of OBE via an empirical research study in Hong Kong. It concludes that the current institutional policy in Hong Kong allows law teachers to adopt a lukewarm attitude towards OBE. Their attitudes towards OBE can be categorised into five groups, ie loyal followers, incidental followers, lukewarm followers, pretenders and deniers.KEYWORDS: Outcome-based education (OBE)academic freedomlegal educationteaching practicesbest practices Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 William G Spady, Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers (American Association of School Administrators 1994) <https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED380910> accessed 11 May 2023.2 Tuning Association, “Tuning-Ahelo Conceptual Framework of Expected and Desired Learning Outcomes in Economics” (OECD, 23 June 2009) 2 <www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/43160495.pdf> accessed 11 May 2023.3 Spady (n 1) 3.4 Maureen Tam, “Outcomes-Based Approach to Quality Assessment and Curriculum Improvement in Higher Education” (2014) 22 Qual Assur Educ 158, 159; Peter Ewell, “Building Academic Cultures of Evidence: A Perspective on Learning Outcomes in Higher Education” (Paper presented at the Symposium of the Hong Kong University Grants Committee on Quality Education, Quality Outcomes – The Way Forward for Hong Kong, June 2008) 1 <www.mec.cuny.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Building-Academic-Cultures-of-Evidence-Peter-Ewell-present_peter.pdf> accessed 11 May 2023.5 UGC <www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/index.html> accessed 11 May 2023.6 UGC, “Symposium on Outcome-Based Approaches in Student Learning: ‘Quality Education, Quality Outcomes: The Way Forward for Hong Kong’” (18 June 2008) <www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/about/press_speech_other/speech/2008/sp20080618.html> accessed 11 May 2023.7 Quality Assurance Council, “Audit Manual Second Audit Cycle” (22 October 2018) 4 <www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/qac/quality/first_degree/second_audit_cycle.html> accessed 11 May 2023.8 HKU, Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre (TaLiC) (formerly known as the Centre for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) <https://talic.hku.hk/> all accessed 23 September 2023.9 TaLiC, “A Short Guide to Outcomes-Based Approaches to Student Learning” <https://er","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135695750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2023.2228125
L. Taylor, N. Baird, U. Cheer, Valerie A. Sotardi, E. Brogt
ABSTRACT From 2014 to 2019 the authors conducted a longitudinal study of a self-selected of cohort of students enrolled in undergraduate law programmes at three New Zealand universities. This article reports the experiences and reflections of 75 cohort members who participated in all seven data collections. By the end of the study, most of the cohort of 75 were engaged in legal work. Results are discussed in the light of four factors influencing student persistence, engagement, and self-efficacy. Results provide data on the nature of participants’ pre-university backgrounds and characteristics; the nature of formal learning opportunities offered to them while at law school and the frequency and ways in which they participated in those activities; their relationships with their teachers and peers; and external events occurring while they were studying that had an adverse impact on their studies. We cannot offer evidence as to how these influences combined to influence the persistence, engagement or self-efficacy of individual students or the wider cohort, but we report commonalities and trends in responses. Also reported is data relating to the cohorts employment destinations and experiences. Areas for further, empirical study are identified, including the need for research on groups under-represented in this cohort.
{"title":"The making of Aotearoa | New Zealand lawyers: a longitudinal study of law students and law graduates","authors":"L. Taylor, N. Baird, U. Cheer, Valerie A. Sotardi, E. Brogt","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2228125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2228125","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT From 2014 to 2019 the authors conducted a longitudinal study of a self-selected of cohort of students enrolled in undergraduate law programmes at three New Zealand universities. This article reports the experiences and reflections of 75 cohort members who participated in all seven data collections. By the end of the study, most of the cohort of 75 were engaged in legal work. Results are discussed in the light of four factors influencing student persistence, engagement, and self-efficacy. Results provide data on the nature of participants’ pre-university backgrounds and characteristics; the nature of formal learning opportunities offered to them while at law school and the frequency and ways in which they participated in those activities; their relationships with their teachers and peers; and external events occurring while they were studying that had an adverse impact on their studies. We cannot offer evidence as to how these influences combined to influence the persistence, engagement or self-efficacy of individual students or the wider cohort, but we report commonalities and trends in responses. Also reported is data relating to the cohorts employment destinations and experiences. Areas for further, empirical study are identified, including the need for research on groups under-represented in this cohort.","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45751353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2023.2238473
S. Prince
{"title":"The legal team of the future","authors":"S. Prince","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2238473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2238473","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44096074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2023.2228124
Ed Mitchell
ABSTRACT Student motivation is an important issue in legal education and directly relates to student confidence, performance and persistence. Research into the efficacy of continuous assessment in higher education has shown that continuous assessment can foster greater student motivation and enjoyment. However, this research has tended to examine continuous assessment strategies for individual modules. By contrast, Essex Law School implemented a continuous assessment strategy involving a programme of assessed online multiple-choice quizzes that was adopted for most of the School’s undergraduate law modules. This paper draws on self-determination theory to show how this continuous assessment strategy had positive effects on perceived competence among undergraduate law students and helped them feel both in control of their learning experience and better equipped to make positive choices about that experience. This study thus suggests that programme-level continuous assessment can be used effectively to address motivation, engagement and wellbeing challenges in legal education.
学生动机是法学教育中的一个重要问题,它直接关系到学生的信心、成绩和毅力。对高等教育中持续评估效果的研究表明,持续评估可以培养更大的学生动机和乐趣。然而,这项研究倾向于检查单个模块的连续评估策略。相比之下,埃塞克斯法学院(Essex Law School)实施了一项持续评估策略,其中包括一个评估在线多项选择题的项目,该项目被该学院的大多数本科法律模块采用。本文利用自我决定理论来展示这种持续评估策略如何对法学本科生的感知能力产生积极影响,并帮助他们既能控制自己的学习经历,又能更好地对学习经历做出积极的选择。因此,这项研究表明,方案级的持续评估可以有效地用于解决法律教育中的动机,参与和福利挑战。
{"title":"Continuous assessment and legal education: how might a programme-level continuous assessment strategy be implemented and how might it affect student motivation?","authors":"Ed Mitchell","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2228124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2228124","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Student motivation is an important issue in legal education and directly relates to student confidence, performance and persistence. Research into the efficacy of continuous assessment in higher education has shown that continuous assessment can foster greater student motivation and enjoyment. However, this research has tended to examine continuous assessment strategies for individual modules. By contrast, Essex Law School implemented a continuous assessment strategy involving a programme of assessed online multiple-choice quizzes that was adopted for most of the School’s undergraduate law modules. This paper draws on self-determination theory to show how this continuous assessment strategy had positive effects on perceived competence among undergraduate law students and helped them feel both in control of their learning experience and better equipped to make positive choices about that experience. This study thus suggests that programme-level continuous assessment can be used effectively to address motivation, engagement and wellbeing challenges in legal education.","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48203564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2023.2238474
Gavin Dingwall
{"title":"Making sense of academic conferences: presenting, participating and organising","authors":"Gavin Dingwall","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2238474","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2238474","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47237642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2023.2246360
Alex Green
ABSTRACT To what extent should law teachers be permitted to advance controversial ethical, moral or political views as part of the LLB curriculum? This short paper grapples with that question by defending the ethical permissibility of such behaviour subject to the important proviso that it does not cause students “pedagogical harm”. In reaching this conclusion, three alternative views are considered and dismissed, each of which seeks either to eliminate value inculcation entirely or to restrict its scope to the moral-political values currently immanent within established law. The approach taken is argumentative, drawing upon analytical philosophy, with each contested and contestable view being presented in propositional form. Ultimately, it is concluded that value inculcation cannot be avoided within legal education and that, given this fact, the question becomes which values law teachers have a responsibility to advance. It is contended that this judgement, fraught though it might be for various reasons, is best left to individual teachers and that, for this reason among others, a permissive “no-harm” approach to value inculcation best justifies current pedagogical practices.
{"title":"“Just teach them the law!”: the ethics of value inculcation within legal education","authors":"Alex Green","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2246360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2246360","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To what extent should law teachers be permitted to advance controversial ethical, moral or political views as part of the LLB curriculum? This short paper grapples with that question by defending the ethical permissibility of such behaviour subject to the important proviso that it does not cause students “pedagogical harm”. In reaching this conclusion, three alternative views are considered and dismissed, each of which seeks either to eliminate value inculcation entirely or to restrict its scope to the moral-political values currently immanent within established law. The approach taken is argumentative, drawing upon analytical philosophy, with each contested and contestable view being presented in propositional form. Ultimately, it is concluded that value inculcation cannot be avoided within legal education and that, given this fact, the question becomes which values law teachers have a responsibility to advance. It is contended that this judgement, fraught though it might be for various reasons, is best left to individual teachers and that, for this reason among others, a permissive “no-harm” approach to value inculcation best justifies current pedagogical practices.","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45035121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}