An overview of the prevalence and pattern of maxillofacial trauma in the south of Iran

Mahnaz Yadollahi, Sarina Sahmeddini
{"title":"An overview of the prevalence and pattern of maxillofacial trauma in the south of Iran","authors":"Mahnaz Yadollahi, Sarina Sahmeddini","doi":"10.34172/JEPT.2021.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of the current study is to determine the prevalence and pattern of maxillofacial trauma. Methods: This is a cross sectional study of maxillofacial trauma cases treated in the referral trauma center of south of Iran. Data of 264 patients were extracted from patients’ records and analyzed. Data included patient’s demographics, injury mechanism, types of maxillofacial injuries, Injury Severity Score (ISS), associated injuries, length of hospital stay and outcome. Binary logistic regression by backward method was applied to determine the effects of independent variables on mortality odds ratio. Results: 85.23% of patients were males and of all patients 87.5% survived. The mean of age was 34.95 ± 16.51. The commonest cause of maxillofacial injury was road traffic accidents (86.31%). The median of ISS was 20.39± 10.24 and patients aged 30-39 years had the highest ISS. Overall, the most common maxillofacial injuries were orbital (59.47%, n=157) followed by maxillary (48.11%, n=127); common associated injuries were related to head (81.44%, n=215) followed by thorax (58.33%, n=154). Age and gender (being male) increased the odds ratio of mortality. An increase in ISS decreased the odds ratio of mortality, but it was not significant. Conclusion: Most of maxillofacial trauma patients suffered from orbital injuries and there were a huge percentage of associated injuries. Gender (male), age and length of hospital stay were the significant variables of mortality in maxillofacial patients. The findings of the current study sheds light on further investigation to treat these patients and enforce road traffic legislation and public education to prevent these traumas.","PeriodicalId":36499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/JEPT.2021.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the current study is to determine the prevalence and pattern of maxillofacial trauma. Methods: This is a cross sectional study of maxillofacial trauma cases treated in the referral trauma center of south of Iran. Data of 264 patients were extracted from patients’ records and analyzed. Data included patient’s demographics, injury mechanism, types of maxillofacial injuries, Injury Severity Score (ISS), associated injuries, length of hospital stay and outcome. Binary logistic regression by backward method was applied to determine the effects of independent variables on mortality odds ratio. Results: 85.23% of patients were males and of all patients 87.5% survived. The mean of age was 34.95 ± 16.51. The commonest cause of maxillofacial injury was road traffic accidents (86.31%). The median of ISS was 20.39± 10.24 and patients aged 30-39 years had the highest ISS. Overall, the most common maxillofacial injuries were orbital (59.47%, n=157) followed by maxillary (48.11%, n=127); common associated injuries were related to head (81.44%, n=215) followed by thorax (58.33%, n=154). Age and gender (being male) increased the odds ratio of mortality. An increase in ISS decreased the odds ratio of mortality, but it was not significant. Conclusion: Most of maxillofacial trauma patients suffered from orbital injuries and there were a huge percentage of associated injuries. Gender (male), age and length of hospital stay were the significant variables of mortality in maxillofacial patients. The findings of the current study sheds light on further investigation to treat these patients and enforce road traffic legislation and public education to prevent these traumas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在伊朗南部的流行和颌面创伤的模式的概述
目的:了解颌面部外伤的发生率和类型。方法:这是一个在伊朗南部转诊创伤中心治疗的颌面创伤病例的横断面研究。从病历中提取264例患者资料进行分析。数据包括患者的人口统计学、损伤机制、颌面部损伤类型、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、相关损伤、住院时间和结果。采用反向二元logistic回归法确定自变量对死亡率比值比的影响。结果:85.23%的患者为男性,生存率为87.5%。平均年龄34.95±16.51岁。颌面部损伤最常见的原因是道路交通事故(86.31%)。ISS的中位值为20.39±10.24,其中30-39岁患者ISS最高。总的来说,最常见的颌面部损伤是眶部(59.47%,n=157),其次是上颌(48.11%,n=127);常见的伴发损伤为头部(81.44%,n=215),其次为胸部(58.33%,n=154)。年龄和性别(男性)增加了死亡率的优势比。ISS的增加降低了死亡率的优势比,但并不显著。结论:颌面部外伤患者以眶部损伤为主,伴发损伤占很大比例。性别(男性)、年龄和住院时间是颌面部患者死亡率的显著变量。目前的研究结果为进一步的调查提供了线索,以治疗这些病人,并加强道路交通立法和公共教育,以防止这些创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rhabdomyolysis following electical injury without acute kidney injury Relationship between cardiac ultrasound findings during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the outcome of patients Using Weibull model of survival analysis workflow and its relevant factors: A prospective cohort study Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration Post-traumatic growth and perceived social support in young adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1