Conflict of interest in the activities of judges in Ukraine and the European Union: a comparative legal study

O. Shevchuk, Oleksandr Lysodyed, N. Matyukhina, O. Babaieva, S. Davydenko
{"title":"Conflict of interest in the activities of judges in Ukraine and the European Union: a comparative legal study","authors":"O. Shevchuk, Oleksandr Lysodyed, N. Matyukhina, O. Babaieva, S. Davydenko","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2023/13/2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines certain problems of legal regulation of preventing conflicts of interest in the activities of judges in Ukraine, ways to resolve it, and foreign experience of individual EU countries in this area. The methodology of scientific work is based on a system of methods of general scientific and special legal methods of cognition. The analysis of the concept of \"conflict of interest\" in the scientific literature, national and international legal documents, in the legislation of individual EU countries was carried out. The definition of \"conflict of interest in the activities of judges\" is proposed. It is argued that the public interest in the activities of judges is the public interest in ensuring that persons working in the judicial system exercise their powers and make decisions impartially, objectively and fairly. Attention is focused on the peculiarities of the application of the system of voluntary disclosure and registration by judges of a list of private interests regarding a conflict of interest. The principles, signs, types and features of the presence or absence of a conflict of interest in the activities of judges are revealed, their content is specified. The procedure for disclosing information about a conflict of interest in the activities of judges is indicated. Two ways of resolving a conflict of interest in the activities of judges are established, their problematic issues are disclosed. The types of responsibility of judges in cases of violation of legislation on conflict of interest are determined. Separate directions for improving the legal regulation of preventing and resolving conflicts of interest in the activities of judges are proposed, taking into account the positive experience of legal regulation of individual EU countries in this area.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2023/13/2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article examines certain problems of legal regulation of preventing conflicts of interest in the activities of judges in Ukraine, ways to resolve it, and foreign experience of individual EU countries in this area. The methodology of scientific work is based on a system of methods of general scientific and special legal methods of cognition. The analysis of the concept of "conflict of interest" in the scientific literature, national and international legal documents, in the legislation of individual EU countries was carried out. The definition of "conflict of interest in the activities of judges" is proposed. It is argued that the public interest in the activities of judges is the public interest in ensuring that persons working in the judicial system exercise their powers and make decisions impartially, objectively and fairly. Attention is focused on the peculiarities of the application of the system of voluntary disclosure and registration by judges of a list of private interests regarding a conflict of interest. The principles, signs, types and features of the presence or absence of a conflict of interest in the activities of judges are revealed, their content is specified. The procedure for disclosing information about a conflict of interest in the activities of judges is indicated. Two ways of resolving a conflict of interest in the activities of judges are established, their problematic issues are disclosed. The types of responsibility of judges in cases of violation of legislation on conflict of interest are determined. Separate directions for improving the legal regulation of preventing and resolving conflicts of interest in the activities of judges are proposed, taking into account the positive experience of legal regulation of individual EU countries in this area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰和欧盟法官活动中的利益冲突:一项比较法律研究
本文探讨了防止乌克兰法官活动中利益冲突的法律法规的某些问题、解决方法以及个别欧盟国家在这一领域的经验。科学工作方法论是建立在一般科学方法和特殊法律认识方法体系的基础上的。对科学文献、国家和国际法律文件以及个别欧盟国家立法中的“利益冲突”概念进行了分析。提出了“法官活动中的利益冲突”的定义。有人认为,法官活动的公共利益是确保司法系统工作人员公正、客观、公正地行使权力和作出决定的公共利益。重点关注法官自愿披露和登记与利益冲突有关的私人利益清单制度的适用特点。揭示了法官活动中存在或不存在利益冲突的原则、标志、类型和特征,并具体说明了其内容。说明了披露法官活动中利益冲突信息的程序。确定了解决法官活动中利益冲突的两种方法,并披露了其存在的问题。法官在违反关于利益冲突的立法的案件中的责任类型已经确定。考虑到个别欧盟国家在这一领域进行法律监管的积极经验,提出了改进预防和解决法官活动中利益冲突的法律监管的单独方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procedure Preventing computer crime by knowing the legal regulations that ensure the protection of computer systems A regulatory analysis of digital financial services and the adoption of central bank digital currencies in Zimbabwe and South Africa Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1