Invest in what you know? How customer investors react to corporate restatements

IF 3.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Organizations and Society Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aos.2023.101496
Shana Clor-Proell , Nikki MacKenzie , Kristina Rennekamp , Kathy Rupar
{"title":"Invest in what you know? How customer investors react to corporate restatements","authors":"Shana Clor-Proell ,&nbsp;Nikki MacKenzie ,&nbsp;Kristina Rennekamp ,&nbsp;Kathy Rupar","doi":"10.1016/j.aos.2023.101496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is increasingly common for individuals to be both customers of, and investors in, a company. Despite their prevalence, we have little understanding of whether customer investors' investment judgments differ from those of non-customer investors. Using three experiments, we examine how customer investors' judgments differ from those of non-customer investors in the wake of an earnings restatement, and how customer investors respond to company-issued disclosures<span> that include favorable information designed to mitigate the effects of the restatement. Drawing on prior marketing research, we predict and find that customer investors identify more strongly with the company and sell fewer shares in response to a restatement than non-customer investors. Further, unlike non-customer investors, customer investors’ judgments are not influenced by favorable information in a company-issued disclosure. Our results have implications for companies that are actively encouraging customer-investor relationships and for investors themselves.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48379,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Organizations and Society","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 101496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Organizations and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368223000673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is increasingly common for individuals to be both customers of, and investors in, a company. Despite their prevalence, we have little understanding of whether customer investors' investment judgments differ from those of non-customer investors. Using three experiments, we examine how customer investors' judgments differ from those of non-customer investors in the wake of an earnings restatement, and how customer investors respond to company-issued disclosures that include favorable information designed to mitigate the effects of the restatement. Drawing on prior marketing research, we predict and find that customer investors identify more strongly with the company and sell fewer shares in response to a restatement than non-customer investors. Further, unlike non-customer investors, customer investors’ judgments are not influenced by favorable information in a company-issued disclosure. Our results have implications for companies that are actively encouraging customer-investor relationships and for investors themselves.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资于你所知道的?客户投资者对公司重述的反应
个人既是公司的客户,又是公司的投资者,这种情况越来越普遍。尽管客户投资者的投资判断普遍存在,但我们对客户投资者的投资判断与非客户投资者的投资判断是否存在差异知之甚少。通过三个实验,我们研究了在收益重述之后,客户投资者的判断与非客户投资者的判断有何不同,以及客户投资者如何对公司发布的披露做出反应,这些披露包括旨在减轻重述影响的有利信息。根据之前的市场研究,我们预测并发现客户投资者对公司的认同感更强,在对重述做出反应时,他们比非客户投资者卖出的股票更少。此外,与非客户投资者不同,客户投资者的判断不受公司披露中有利信息的影响。我们的研究结果对那些积极鼓励客户-投资者关系的公司和投资者本身都有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting, Organizations & Society is a major international journal concerned with all aspects of the relationship between accounting and human behaviour, organizational structures and processes, and the changing social and political environment of the enterprise.
期刊最新文献
What you are versus what you do: The effect of noun-verb framing in earnings conference calls Seeking justice: Inequitable management compensation and employee whistleblowing The impact of descriptor identicalness on investors' judgements of managers’ opportunistic estimation choices Bringing morality back in: Accounting as moral interlocutor in reflective equilibrium processes Accounting and the shifting spheres: The economic, the public, the planet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1