SIMULTANEOUS ANALYSIS OF THE FEASIBILITY AND PRIORITY OF TOURIST ATTRACTIONS: A CASE STUDY OF ECOTOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN TANAH LAUT REGENCY, INDONESIA

Meldayanoor Meldayanoor, Gusti MUHAMMAD HATTA, A. Hidayat, A. Nugroho
{"title":"SIMULTANEOUS ANALYSIS OF THE FEASIBILITY AND PRIORITY OF TOURIST ATTRACTIONS: A CASE STUDY OF ECOTOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN TANAH LAUT REGENCY, INDONESIA","authors":"Meldayanoor Meldayanoor, Gusti MUHAMMAD HATTA, A. Hidayat, A. Nugroho","doi":"10.46754/jssm.2023.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecotourism is vital in reducing negative environmental impacts and helping sustainable development. Developing ecotourism destinations require comprehensive studies, including the feasibility and priority of the tourist attractions. Many studies concentrate on ecotourism development; however, only a few reports deal with feasibility and priority, particularly biodiversity. Tanah Laut, a regency in the southeast part of Borneo Island has excellent ecotourism potential. This study aims to assess the feasibility and priority of seven ecotourism attractions through simultaneous methods consisting of the Analysis of Natural Tourist Attractions (ANTA) and the Exponential Comparison Method (ECM) for their feasibility and priority, consecutively. 10 criteria were involved in the ECM analysis: Natural and environment, human resources, market potential, transportation and communication, infrastructure, institutional support, security, tourism support, social and culture, and physical condition. The ANTA analysis showed that the seven ecotourism attractions in Tanah Laut Regency satisfy the minimum feasibility criteria to be developed as ecotourism objects. Furthermore, Mount Birah was elected the most priority due to its natural, human resources and market potential. This study suggests that simultaneous methods of ANTA and ECM could be used as adequate tools in a decision-support system for ecotourism development.","PeriodicalId":17041,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2023.02.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecotourism is vital in reducing negative environmental impacts and helping sustainable development. Developing ecotourism destinations require comprehensive studies, including the feasibility and priority of the tourist attractions. Many studies concentrate on ecotourism development; however, only a few reports deal with feasibility and priority, particularly biodiversity. Tanah Laut, a regency in the southeast part of Borneo Island has excellent ecotourism potential. This study aims to assess the feasibility and priority of seven ecotourism attractions through simultaneous methods consisting of the Analysis of Natural Tourist Attractions (ANTA) and the Exponential Comparison Method (ECM) for their feasibility and priority, consecutively. 10 criteria were involved in the ECM analysis: Natural and environment, human resources, market potential, transportation and communication, infrastructure, institutional support, security, tourism support, social and culture, and physical condition. The ANTA analysis showed that the seven ecotourism attractions in Tanah Laut Regency satisfy the minimum feasibility criteria to be developed as ecotourism objects. Furthermore, Mount Birah was elected the most priority due to its natural, human resources and market potential. This study suggests that simultaneous methods of ANTA and ECM could be used as adequate tools in a decision-support system for ecotourism development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旅游景点可行性与优先性的同步分析——以印尼塔纳劳特县生态旅游开发为例
生态旅游对于减少对环境的负面影响和促进可持续发展至关重要。开发生态旅游地需要综合研究,包括旅游景点的可行性和优先性。许多研究集中在生态旅游的开发上;然而,只有少数报告涉及可行性和优先事项,特别是生物多样性。Tanah Laut是婆罗洲岛东南部的一个摄政区,具有良好的生态旅游潜力。本研究旨在通过自然旅游景点分析法(ANTA)和指数比比法(ECM)对7个生态旅游景点的可行性和优先性进行评价。ECM分析涉及10项标准:自然和环境、人力资源、市场潜力、交通和通讯、基础设施、制度支持、安全、旅游支持、社会和文化以及物质条件。安踏分析表明,塔那劳特摄政区的7个生态旅游景点满足作为生态旅游对象开发的最低可行性标准。此外,比拉山因其自然资源、人力资源和市场潜力而被选为最优先。研究结果表明,生态旅游发展决策支持系统中可以同时使用安踏和生态综合评价方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sustainability Science and Management is an Open-Access and peer-reviewed journal aims to publish scientific articles related to sustainable science; i.e. an interaction between natural sciences, social science, technologies and management for sustainable development and wise use of resources. We particularly encourage manuscripts that discuss contemporary research that can be used directly or indirectly in addressing critical issues and sharing of advanced knowledge and best practices in sustainable development.
期刊最新文献
UNFOLDING THE BARRIERS TO TEACHING AND LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY AMONG UNDERGRADUATE PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS ANTECEDENTS OF ORGANIC FOOD PURCHASE INTENTION: DOES IT MODERATE BY THE RECEPTIVITY TO GREEN COMMUNICATION? NO CHANGES IN THE ACCOMMODATIVE STIMULUS-RESPONSE CURVE BUT VARIED LAG OF ACCOMMODATION AFTER A 30-MIN ELECTRONIC NEAR TASK UNDER FOUR DIFFERENT LIGHTING CONDITIONS AMONG MYOPIC YOUNG ADULTS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR RUBBER PLANTATION USING GOAL PROGRAMMING SOCIO-SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION: PERSPECTIVE OF MANAGEMENT OF COASTAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BASED ON OPTIMISING THE ROLE OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES IN MANADO CITY, INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1