Using technology to promote student learning? An analysis of pre- and in-service teachers’ lesson plans

IF 3.4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Technology Pedagogy and Education Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1080/1475939X.2022.2083669
Christina Wekerle, I. Kollar
{"title":"Using technology to promote student learning? An analysis of pre- and in-service teachers’ lesson plans","authors":"Christina Wekerle, I. Kollar","doi":"10.1080/1475939X.2022.2083669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Technology may promote student engagement in high-level learning processes in the classroom. Yet, whether teachers really exploit technology’s potential to support student learning depends on their expertise. The authors compared pre-service and technology-experienced in-service teachers’ reasoning about technology-enhanced lessons by means of lesson plans. The authors assumed that technology-experienced teachers’ lesson plans would target more high-level learning activities than those of pre-service teachers. They asked N = 134 pre-service and technology-experienced in-service teachers to plan an ideal technology-enhanced classroom lesson. The teachers were requested to report the types of learning activities they would have students engage in, both during technology-enhanced and non-technology-enhanced lesson activities. As assumed, in-service teachers were more likely to include higher-level technology-enhanced learning activities than pre-service teachers. However, the authors found no differences for non-technology-enhanced learning activities. Based on these findings and further qualitative analyses, implications for curriculum design are drawn.","PeriodicalId":46992,"journal":{"name":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","volume":"31 1","pages":"597 - 614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2083669","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Technology may promote student engagement in high-level learning processes in the classroom. Yet, whether teachers really exploit technology’s potential to support student learning depends on their expertise. The authors compared pre-service and technology-experienced in-service teachers’ reasoning about technology-enhanced lessons by means of lesson plans. The authors assumed that technology-experienced teachers’ lesson plans would target more high-level learning activities than those of pre-service teachers. They asked N = 134 pre-service and technology-experienced in-service teachers to plan an ideal technology-enhanced classroom lesson. The teachers were requested to report the types of learning activities they would have students engage in, both during technology-enhanced and non-technology-enhanced lesson activities. As assumed, in-service teachers were more likely to include higher-level technology-enhanced learning activities than pre-service teachers. However, the authors found no differences for non-technology-enhanced learning activities. Based on these findings and further qualitative analyses, implications for curriculum design are drawn.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用技术促进学生学习?职前教师与在职教师课程计划分析
摘要技术可以促进学生在课堂上参与高水平的学习过程。然而,教师是否真的利用技术的潜力来支持学生的学习取决于他们的专业知识。作者比较了职前和有技术经验的在职教师通过课程计划对技术强化课程的推理。作者认为,与职前教师相比,有技术经验的教师的课程计划将针对更多的高水平学习活动。他们要求N=134名有职前和技术经验的在职教师计划一堂理想的技术强化课堂课。教师被要求报告他们将让学生参与的学习活动类型,包括在技术强化和非技术强化的课堂活动中。正如假设的那样,在职教师比在职教师更有可能包括更高级别的技术强化学习活动。然而,作者发现非技术强化学习活动没有差异。基于这些发现和进一步的定性分析,得出了对课程设计的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technology Pedagogy and Education
Technology Pedagogy and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Student teacher learning with Ozobots and Makey Makeys during a workshop and field experience Scripted synergy: elevating EFL writing and creativity through collaborative digital storytelling Unmasking the depoliticisation of ICT in digital competence frameworks for educators: a critical discourse study WhatsApp for pedagogy: initiatives, instructional practices and the nature of knowledge in Israel’s secondary education A testing load: a review of cognitive load in computer and paper-based learning and assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1