OPTIMAL ALLOCATION MODEL OF FOREST FIRE DETECTION TOWERS IN PROTECTED AREAS BASED ON FIRE OCCURRENCE RISK: WHERE AND HOW TO ACT?

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Canadian Journal of Forest Research Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.1139/cjfr-2023-0084
A. H. C. Ramalho, N. Fiedler, A. R. dos Santos, R. S. Juvanhol, T. M. O. Peluzio, H. M. Dias, R. S. Pereira, Fernanda Dalfiôr Maffioletti, Jâmille Silva Araújo, Mariana Aquino Aragão, Gabriel Madeira da Silva Guanaes, Leonardo Duarte Biazatti, F. Lucas
{"title":"OPTIMAL ALLOCATION MODEL OF FOREST FIRE DETECTION TOWERS IN PROTECTED AREAS BASED ON FIRE OCCURRENCE RISK: WHERE AND HOW TO ACT?","authors":"A. H. C. Ramalho, N. Fiedler, A. R. dos Santos, R. S. Juvanhol, T. M. O. Peluzio, H. M. Dias, R. S. Pereira, Fernanda Dalfiôr Maffioletti, Jâmille Silva Araújo, Mariana Aquino Aragão, Gabriel Madeira da Silva Guanaes, Leonardo Duarte Biazatti, F. Lucas","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2023-0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forest fire detection towers are crucial in supporting rapid firefighting actions in conservation units and thus reducing environmental, social, and economic damages. Thus, the aim was to evaluate scenarios for optimal allocation of forest fire detection towers, according to the risk of occurrence, in the Caparaó National Park, Brazil. Thus, by geotechnological analysis, the area’s most susceptible to forest fires and the optimal locations for installation of detection and monitoring for these events were delimited. To run the proposed models, biological, physical, socioeconomic, and meteorological variables were used. From the application of the methodologies, it was observed that 76.70% of the study area was covered by low, moderate, and shallow fire risk classes, while high and very high-risk classes were concentrated in the buffer zone. The scenario with 45 towers was considered the most advantageous, given that they presented viewing levels above 70% and a lower cost per hectare viewed than the scenario with 48 towers. Results showed no critical risks of fire occurrence within the Conservation Unit, but preventive measures are still needed to avoid fire spread, particularly near the buffer zone. The study's methodologies can be applied in other areas to improve forest fire prevention and control efforts.","PeriodicalId":9483,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2023-0084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest fire detection towers are crucial in supporting rapid firefighting actions in conservation units and thus reducing environmental, social, and economic damages. Thus, the aim was to evaluate scenarios for optimal allocation of forest fire detection towers, according to the risk of occurrence, in the Caparaó National Park, Brazil. Thus, by geotechnological analysis, the area’s most susceptible to forest fires and the optimal locations for installation of detection and monitoring for these events were delimited. To run the proposed models, biological, physical, socioeconomic, and meteorological variables were used. From the application of the methodologies, it was observed that 76.70% of the study area was covered by low, moderate, and shallow fire risk classes, while high and very high-risk classes were concentrated in the buffer zone. The scenario with 45 towers was considered the most advantageous, given that they presented viewing levels above 70% and a lower cost per hectare viewed than the scenario with 48 towers. Results showed no critical risks of fire occurrence within the Conservation Unit, but preventive measures are still needed to avoid fire spread, particularly near the buffer zone. The study's methodologies can be applied in other areas to improve forest fire prevention and control efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于火灾发生风险的保护区森林火灾探测塔优化配置模型:在哪里,如何行动?
森林火灾探测塔对于支持保护单位的快速消防行动至关重要,从而减少环境、社会和经济损失。因此,目的是根据发生风险,评估巴西卡帕罗国家公园森林火灾探测塔的最佳配置方案。因此,通过岩土工程分析,确定了该地区最容易发生森林火灾的地区以及安装这些事件的探测和监测的最佳位置。为了运行所提出的模型,使用了生物学、物理、社会经济和气象变量。从方法的应用来看,76.70%的研究区域被低、中等和浅层火灾风险等级所覆盖,而高和极高风险等级则集中在缓冲区。有45座塔楼的场景被认为是最有利的,因为它们的观看水平超过70%,每公顷的观看成本低于有48座塔楼的情况。结果显示,保护区内没有发生火灾的重大风险,但仍需要采取预防措施,以避免火灾蔓延,特别是在缓冲区附近。该研究的方法可以应用于其他领域,以改进森林火灾预防和控制工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, the Canadian Journal of Forest Research is a monthly journal that features articles, reviews, notes and concept papers on a broad spectrum of forest sciences, including biometrics, conservation, disturbances, ecology, economics, entomology, genetics, hydrology, management, nutrient cycling, pathology, physiology, remote sensing, silviculture, social sciences, soils, stand dynamics, and wood science, all in relation to the understanding or management of ecosystem services. It also publishes special issues dedicated to a topic of current interest.
期刊最新文献
Potential replacement understory woody plants for Robinia pseudoacacia plantations: Species composition and vertical distribution pattern Which factors influence consumers’ selection of wood as a building material for houses? Can partial-cut harvesting be used to extend the availability of terrestrial forage lichens in late-seral pine-lichen woodlands? Evidence from the Lewes Marsh (southern Yukon) silvicultural systems trial. Challenges and Opportunities Associated with Lifting the Zero COVID-19 Policy in China. Modelling diameter at breast height distribution of jack pine and black spruce natural stands in eastern Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1