The rough road towards accounting harmonization of a developing country with a French accounting culture

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Research Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-18 DOI:10.1108/arj-02-2021-0075
F. Slama, Ahmed Atef Oussii, Mohamed Faker Klibi
{"title":"The rough road towards accounting harmonization of a developing country with a French accounting culture","authors":"F. Slama, Ahmed Atef Oussii, Mohamed Faker Klibi","doi":"10.1108/arj-02-2021-0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate in-depth and explain the issues related to the experience of Tunisia, a developing country, in its attempt to move from Euro-Continental rule-based generally accepted accounting principles (GAAPs) to an accounting system adapted to international financial reporting standards (IFRS).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study is conducted via a qualitative methodology based on a content analysis of primary data from interviews with key actors involved in financial reporting in Tunisia.\n\n\nFindings\nFindings reveal that local Tunisian GAAPs, adapted to IFRS in their 1996 version, failed to establish a financial reporting accounting culture and meet public-interest firms’ informational needs. This is mainly related to factors, such as the simplified methods adopted (generally adequate to the identified needs of users of small and medium-sized entity financial statements) and the hybrid aspect of the Tunisian accounting standards due to the co-existence of Euro-Continental and Anglo-Saxon parties. Moreover, the findings show that the lack of political willpower and the absence of updates to changes in IFRS have compromised the proper functioning of standardization and control structures.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study’s results may interest regulators and policymakers of many developing countries that have not pursued the harmonization of their local GAAPs with IFRS. In addition, findings from the research provide insights into the rough road towards harmonization, the dysfunctions of the latter and delays in developing countries.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe research highlights the complexity for an emerging country with Euro-Continental accounting traditions to move to IFRS.\n","PeriodicalId":45591,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Research Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-02-2021-0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate in-depth and explain the issues related to the experience of Tunisia, a developing country, in its attempt to move from Euro-Continental rule-based generally accepted accounting principles (GAAPs) to an accounting system adapted to international financial reporting standards (IFRS). Design/methodology/approach The study is conducted via a qualitative methodology based on a content analysis of primary data from interviews with key actors involved in financial reporting in Tunisia. Findings Findings reveal that local Tunisian GAAPs, adapted to IFRS in their 1996 version, failed to establish a financial reporting accounting culture and meet public-interest firms’ informational needs. This is mainly related to factors, such as the simplified methods adopted (generally adequate to the identified needs of users of small and medium-sized entity financial statements) and the hybrid aspect of the Tunisian accounting standards due to the co-existence of Euro-Continental and Anglo-Saxon parties. Moreover, the findings show that the lack of political willpower and the absence of updates to changes in IFRS have compromised the proper functioning of standardization and control structures. Practical implications The study’s results may interest regulators and policymakers of many developing countries that have not pursued the harmonization of their local GAAPs with IFRS. In addition, findings from the research provide insights into the rough road towards harmonization, the dysfunctions of the latter and delays in developing countries. Originality/value The research highlights the complexity for an emerging country with Euro-Continental accounting traditions to move to IFRS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个具有法国会计文化的发展中国家实现会计协调的艰难道路
目的本文的目的是深入调查和解释与突尼斯这个发展中国家的经验有关的问题,该研究试图从欧洲大陆基于规则的公认会计原则(GAP)转变为适应国际财务报告准则(IFRS)的会计体系。设计/方法/方法该研究是通过定性方法进行的,该方法基于对年参与财务报告的主要参与者访谈的主要数据的内容分析突尼斯。Findings调查结果显示,突尼斯当地的GAAP在1996年版本中根据《国际财务报告准则》进行了调整,未能建立财务报告会计文化,也未能满足公共利益公司的信息需求。这主要与一些因素有关,如所采用的简化方法(通常足以满足中小型实体财务报表用户的确定需求),以及由于欧洲大陆集团和盎格鲁撒克逊集团的共存,突尼斯会计准则的混合方面。此外,调查结果表明,缺乏政治意志和没有更新《国际财务报告准则》的变化,损害了标准化和控制结构的正常运作。实际含义该研究的结果可能会引起许多发展中国家的监管机构和政策制定者的兴趣,这些国家尚未寻求将其当地GAAP与IFRS相协调。此外,研究结果还深入了解了发展中国家实现统一的艰难道路、统一的功能失调和延误。独创性/价值该研究强调了一个具有欧洲大陆会计传统的新兴国家转向《国际财务报告准则》的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Research Journal
Accounting Research Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The role of other comprehensive income in analyst valuation: profitability, perception and performance Does aural accounting improve the stakeholder relationship capability? Factors influencing readiness to implement digital audit among internal auditors of the Malaysian public sector Does a CEO from a reputable university create a better working environment? Evidence from Indonesia IFRS-9, expected loan loss provisioning and bank liquidity creation: early evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1