Labor market impacts of state-level occupational licensing of undocumented immigrants

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS Research in Economics Pub Date : 2023-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.rie.2023.08.001
Xin Brown
{"title":"Labor market impacts of state-level occupational licensing of undocumented immigrants","authors":"Xin Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2023.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since 2015, several U.S. states have begun granting professional or occupational licenses to recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. In this study, we examine the differences in the issuance of such licenses at the state level to estimate their effect on the labor market outcomes of DACA recipients. Using data from the Current Population Survey spanning the period from 2012 to 2020, we find that granting access to occupational licensing has had a significant positive impact on the wages of DACA recipients, raising them by 12.5 percent. We also observe that this wage premium is greater for male recipients than for female ones. Furthermore, we find that the wage premium and increased hours of work resulting from access to licenses are most pronounced for recipients over 24 years of age who have completed their formal education and have already established their careers. These findings suggest that access to occupational licenses can improve the labor market outcomes of Dreamers. Therefore, expanding access to public benefits, such as licensing, can substantially benefit DACA recipients in states where such access has been broadened.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"77 4","pages":"Pages 478-496"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109094432300056X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2015, several U.S. states have begun granting professional or occupational licenses to recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. In this study, we examine the differences in the issuance of such licenses at the state level to estimate their effect on the labor market outcomes of DACA recipients. Using data from the Current Population Survey spanning the period from 2012 to 2020, we find that granting access to occupational licensing has had a significant positive impact on the wages of DACA recipients, raising them by 12.5 percent. We also observe that this wage premium is greater for male recipients than for female ones. Furthermore, we find that the wage premium and increased hours of work resulting from access to licenses are most pronounced for recipients over 24 years of age who have completed their formal education and have already established their careers. These findings suggest that access to occupational licenses can improve the labor market outcomes of Dreamers. Therefore, expanding access to public benefits, such as licensing, can substantially benefit DACA recipients in states where such access has been broadened.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无证移民的国家级职业许可对劳动力市场的影响
自2015年以来,美国几个州开始向“童年抵美者暂缓遣返计划”(DACA)的接受者颁发专业或职业执照。在本研究中,我们考察了州一级颁发此类许可证的差异,以估计它们对DACA接受者劳动力市场结果的影响。利用2012年至2020年期间的当前人口调查数据,我们发现获得职业许可对DACA受助人的工资产生了显著的积极影响,使他们的工资提高了12.5%。我们还观察到,男性接受者的工资溢价高于女性接受者。此外,我们发现,获得执照所带来的工资溢价和工作时间的增加,对于24岁以上、完成了正规教育并已经建立了自己的职业生涯的人来说最为明显。这些发现表明,获得职业执照可以改善梦想家的劳动力市场结果。因此,扩大获得公共福利的机会,例如获得许可,可以大大惠及已经扩大这种机会的州的DACA受助人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
89 days
期刊介绍: Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.
期刊最新文献
Bulkiness of goods and the gravity of international trade: Differential impact of trade barriers Oil Price and Long-run Economic Growth in Oil-importing Developing Countries Foreign aid and inequality: Do conflicts matter? The macroeconomic effects of productivity shocks: Predictions of conventional business cycle models are not always incompatible with SSA economies An inquiry into the causes of income differences among high-income countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1