Corporate governance and risk management: a systematic review and synthesis for future research

Ankit Kalia, Suveera Gill
{"title":"Corporate governance and risk management: a systematic review and synthesis for future research","authors":"Ankit Kalia, Suveera Gill","doi":"10.1108/jamr-07-2022-0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe world economy has experienced several economic downturns, and each phase emphasised that no industry is immune to inappropriate risk-management practices. Against the backdrop of the recent COVID-19 pandemic, which had far more effects than a financial crisis, the existing paper reviewed the state of current research in the realm of corporate governance and risk-management practices.Design/methodology/approachThis study rigorously followed a systematic approach in identifying, selecting and critically synthesising the existing literature on corporate governance and risk management. The review was carried out on the Web of Science and Scopus database until December 31, 2022. In total, 72 research works were examined and reviewed.FindingsThis systematic literature review showed that companies with strong governance mechanisms are less exposed to corporate risks. Several attributes, such as higher institutional ownership stakes, concentrated family ownership structures, lower CEO compensation and duality, higher presence of females in the management, better board dynamics in terms of independent boards and gender diversity are all strong mechanisms for mitigating risk. Additionally, socially responsible companies are better positioned to mitigate corporate risks. Furthermore, several themes emphasising the governance risk link have been identified to understand this domain further.Originality/valueBy analysing and synthesising existing corporate governance and risk-management themes, this study ascertained various research gaps that can be addressed in future studies. Furthermore, drawing on this paper's essential cues, researchers can significantly differentiate their work from existing ones in the field.","PeriodicalId":46158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Management Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-07-2022-0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe world economy has experienced several economic downturns, and each phase emphasised that no industry is immune to inappropriate risk-management practices. Against the backdrop of the recent COVID-19 pandemic, which had far more effects than a financial crisis, the existing paper reviewed the state of current research in the realm of corporate governance and risk-management practices.Design/methodology/approachThis study rigorously followed a systematic approach in identifying, selecting and critically synthesising the existing literature on corporate governance and risk management. The review was carried out on the Web of Science and Scopus database until December 31, 2022. In total, 72 research works were examined and reviewed.FindingsThis systematic literature review showed that companies with strong governance mechanisms are less exposed to corporate risks. Several attributes, such as higher institutional ownership stakes, concentrated family ownership structures, lower CEO compensation and duality, higher presence of females in the management, better board dynamics in terms of independent boards and gender diversity are all strong mechanisms for mitigating risk. Additionally, socially responsible companies are better positioned to mitigate corporate risks. Furthermore, several themes emphasising the governance risk link have been identified to understand this domain further.Originality/valueBy analysing and synthesising existing corporate governance and risk-management themes, this study ascertained various research gaps that can be addressed in future studies. Furthermore, drawing on this paper's essential cues, researchers can significantly differentiate their work from existing ones in the field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公司治理与风险管理:对未来研究的系统回顾和综合
世界经济经历了几次经济衰退,每个阶段都强调,没有哪个行业能够免受不适当的风险管理措施的影响。在最近的COVID-19大流行的背景下,其影响远远超过金融危机,现有文件审查了公司治理和风险管理实践领域的当前研究状况。设计/方法/方法本研究严格遵循一种系统的方法来识别、选择和批判性地综合现有的关于公司治理和风险管理的文献。本次评审在Web of Science和Scopus数据库上进行,截止到2022年12月31日。共审查和审查了72项研究工作。通过系统的文献综述,我们发现治理机制强的公司面临的公司风险更小。较高的机构股权、集中的家族股权结构、较低的首席执行官薪酬和双重性、管理层中女性比例较高、独立董事会中更好的董事会动态以及性别多样性等因素,都是降低风险的有力机制。此外,有社会责任的公司更有能力降低企业风险。此外,已经确定了几个强调治理风险联系的主题,以进一步理解该领域。原创性/价值通过分析和综合现有的公司治理和风险管理主题,本研究确定了可以在未来研究中解决的各种研究空白。此外,利用本文的基本线索,研究人员可以显著地将他们的工作与该领域现有的工作区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The type of supplier involvement in new product development in the automotive industry: metaheuristic-based K-means clustering and analytic hierarchical process methods Resilience of developing economies to external shocks: empirical evidence from CEMAC countries Unbraiding the effect of policy benefits on subjective well-being: the mediating role of work-related well-being Development and psychometric validation of a scale for sources of resistance to change in higher education institutions Assessment of bus fleet service quality: a graph theoretical approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1