The role of specialised content knowledge in teaching basic life support

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Health Education Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-17 DOI:10.1177/00178969231174685
Tom Madou, F. Depaepe, P. Ward, P. Iserbyt
{"title":"The role of specialised content knowledge in teaching basic life support","authors":"Tom Madou, F. Depaepe, P. Ward, P. Iserbyt","doi":"10.1177/00178969231174685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the role of specialised content knowledge in instructor training on the teaching and learning of basic life support (BLS) in secondary schools. Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting: Data were collected in three Flemish secondary schools during physical education classes. Method: Three secondary schools were randomly assigned to a 60-minute BLS instructor training without (one school, three teachers) or with (two schools, five teachers) a focus on recognising and addressing common errors. Knowledge of common errors in the performance of BLS and how to correct these is referred to as specialised content knowledge. Following instructor training, all teachers taught BLS lessons to different students. Teachers’ use of time and interactions were assessed by means of systematic observation. BLS performance was assessed individually and unannounced to students (n = 294) one week following their training using a validated protocol. Results: On average, specialised content knowledge teachers interacted more with their students compared to common content knowledge teachers (8 vs 3 teacher interactions per lesson to the class as a whole, 43 vs 31 teacher interactions per lesson to students individually). In addition, students taught by specialised content knowledge teachers achieved significantly higher BLS scores (66% vs 61%; p < .05). Overall, average BLS performance of students correlated positively with the amount of time reserved for hands-on practice, r(21) = .51; p < .05. Conclusion: Specialised content knowledge (i.e. recognising and addressing common errors) should be part of BLS instructor training courses.","PeriodicalId":47346,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Journal","volume":"82 1","pages":"555 - 568"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969231174685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the role of specialised content knowledge in instructor training on the teaching and learning of basic life support (BLS) in secondary schools. Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting: Data were collected in three Flemish secondary schools during physical education classes. Method: Three secondary schools were randomly assigned to a 60-minute BLS instructor training without (one school, three teachers) or with (two schools, five teachers) a focus on recognising and addressing common errors. Knowledge of common errors in the performance of BLS and how to correct these is referred to as specialised content knowledge. Following instructor training, all teachers taught BLS lessons to different students. Teachers’ use of time and interactions were assessed by means of systematic observation. BLS performance was assessed individually and unannounced to students (n = 294) one week following their training using a validated protocol. Results: On average, specialised content knowledge teachers interacted more with their students compared to common content knowledge teachers (8 vs 3 teacher interactions per lesson to the class as a whole, 43 vs 31 teacher interactions per lesson to students individually). In addition, students taught by specialised content knowledge teachers achieved significantly higher BLS scores (66% vs 61%; p < .05). Overall, average BLS performance of students correlated positively with the amount of time reserved for hands-on practice, r(21) = .51; p < .05. Conclusion: Specialised content knowledge (i.e. recognising and addressing common errors) should be part of BLS instructor training courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业内容知识在基本生命支持教学中的作用
目的:探讨专业内容知识在中学基本生命支持教学中的作用。设计:整群随机对照试验。背景:数据是在三所佛兰德中学的体育课上收集的。方法:三所中学被随机分配到60分钟的BLS讲师培训中,没有(一所学校,三名教师)或有(两所学校,五名教师)专注于识别和解决常见错误。关于BLS性能中常见错误以及如何纠正这些错误的知识被称为专业内容知识。在教员培训之后,所有教师向不同的学生教授BLS课程。通过系统观察的方式评估教师对时间的使用和互动。BLS的表现是单独评估的,没有事先通知学生(n = 294)在他们使用经验证的协议进行训练后一周。结果:平均而言,与普通内容知识教师相比,专业内容知识教师与学生的互动更多(每节课教师与整个班级的互动为8次,而教师与学生个人的互动为43次,而不是31次)。此外,由专业内容知识教师教授的学生获得了显著更高的BLS分数(66%对61%;p < .05)。总体而言,学生的平均BLS成绩与动手练习的时间呈正相关,r(21) = .51;p < .05.结论:专业内容知识(即识别和解决常见错误)应成为BLS讲师培训课程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Health Education Journal is a leading peer reviewed journal established in 1943. It carries original papers on health promotion and education research, policy development and good practice.
期刊最新文献
Students', parents' and teachers' perspectives on comprehensive school-based sleep promotion. The effect of an educational intervention on healthy lifestyle knowledge and behaviour among middle-aged women Men’s experiences of HeadsUpGuys: A strength-based case study Listening ‘with’ children ‘to’ the more-than-human world: A diffractive analysis of the child and the challenge of sustainability Anatomically correct models for visually impaired learners: Teachers’ perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1