{"title":"How plausible is the relative plausibility theory of proof?","authors":"H. Lai","doi":"10.1177/1365712718813783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This response to Allen and Pardo focuses mainly on questioning the comparative nature of juridical proof under their relative plausibility theory.","PeriodicalId":54168,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence & Proof","volume":"23 1","pages":"191 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1365712718813783","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence & Proof","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712718813783","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This response to Allen and Pardo focuses mainly on questioning the comparative nature of juridical proof under their relative plausibility theory.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
