Institutional Logics and Diverging Organizational Forms: An Empirical Study in Russia

IF 1.1 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.20899/jpna.6.2.159-181
Maria V. Wathen
{"title":"Institutional Logics and Diverging Organizational Forms: An Empirical Study in Russia","authors":"Maria V. Wathen","doi":"10.20899/jpna.6.2.159-181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using an institutional logics approach, this study investigates how the institutional logics of leaders of grassroots social service nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Russia changed over time and how these changes related to changes in organizational mission, people served, professionalization, and interactions with the government. Relying on interviews as well as other data gathered, this analysis of organizational leaders’ narratives reveals the identities and experiences that these leaders turn to in their sensemaking of significant events. The findings show that, on the one hand, social welfare NGOs continued to provide services, increased their advocacy efforts, and professionalized their staff. Volunteer organizations, on the other hand, discontinued provision of social services turning instead to the recruitment and development of volunteers. Theoretically, this empirical case illustrates how an interplay of factors at multiple levels can affect the expression of logics at the organizational level.","PeriodicalId":43150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.6.2.159-181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Using an institutional logics approach, this study investigates how the institutional logics of leaders of grassroots social service nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Russia changed over time and how these changes related to changes in organizational mission, people served, professionalization, and interactions with the government. Relying on interviews as well as other data gathered, this analysis of organizational leaders’ narratives reveals the identities and experiences that these leaders turn to in their sensemaking of significant events. The findings show that, on the one hand, social welfare NGOs continued to provide services, increased their advocacy efforts, and professionalized their staff. Volunteer organizations, on the other hand, discontinued provision of social services turning instead to the recruitment and development of volunteers. Theoretically, this empirical case illustrates how an interplay of factors at multiple levels can affect the expression of logics at the organizational level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度逻辑与组织形式分化:俄罗斯的实证研究
本研究运用制度逻辑方法,探讨了俄罗斯基层社会服务非政府组织(ngo)领导人的制度逻辑如何随时间变化,以及这些变化与组织使命、服务对象、专业化以及与政府互动的变化之间的关系。依靠访谈和其他收集到的数据,这种对组织领导者叙事的分析揭示了这些领导者在重大事件的意义上转向的身份和经验。调查结果显示,一方面,社会福利ngo继续提供服务,加大宣传力度,人员职业化;另一方面,志愿组织停止提供社会服务,转而征聘和发展志愿人员。从理论上讲,这一实证案例说明了多层次因素的相互作用如何影响组织层面的逻辑表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Empowerment or Exploitation? Ethical Engagement of Survivor Leaders in Anti-Trafficking Organizations Defining and Measuring Economic Development: A Literature Review and Outlook Unpacking the Volunteer Experience: The Influence of Volunteer Management on Retention and Promotion of the Organization Front Matter #BlackLivesMatter (BLM) Was Never About Officer Race
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1