"A New Instrument for Assessment of Emotion Regulation: The Emotion Regulation Interview-Revised Form"

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.24193/jebp.2021.2.17
Pelin Bintaș-Zörer, O. Yorulmaz
{"title":"\"A New Instrument for Assessment of Emotion Regulation:\nThe Emotion Regulation Interview-Revised Form\"","authors":"Pelin Bintaș-Zörer, O. Yorulmaz","doi":"10.24193/jebp.2021.2.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The main purpose of the present study is to adapt the Emotion Regulation\nInterview (ERI) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties,\nwhile at the same time, to revise it by extending its scope in terms of\nemotions, emotion regulation (ER) strategies, and the efficacy measures\nrelated to ER strategies. For this purpose, various adjustments have been\nmade to the original interview form, resulting in the Emotion Regulation\nInterview-Revised Form (ERI-RF). The ERI-RF evaluates the regulation of\nthe emotions (i.e., anxiety, sadness, anger) experienced in romantic\nrelationships, recognizing that emotions and ER mostly emerge in close\nrelationships. A total of 138 participants in romantic relationships were\ninterviewed using the ERI-RF, and second interviews were conducted with\n31 of the participants for the assessment of test-retest reliability. Results\nshowed that the ERI-RF had good validity results, and the use of some ER\nstrategies to certain emotions demonstrated sufficient test-retest reliability.\nIt was concluded that the ERI-RF, as an assessment tool for the evaluation\nof a wide range of ER strategies based on the most frequently experienced\nemotions, has sufficient psychometric properties, and that its use in different\nsamples in feature studies may yield useful results.\"","PeriodicalId":43042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2021.2.17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

"The main purpose of the present study is to adapt the Emotion Regulation Interview (ERI) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties, while at the same time, to revise it by extending its scope in terms of emotions, emotion regulation (ER) strategies, and the efficacy measures related to ER strategies. For this purpose, various adjustments have been made to the original interview form, resulting in the Emotion Regulation Interview-Revised Form (ERI-RF). The ERI-RF evaluates the regulation of the emotions (i.e., anxiety, sadness, anger) experienced in romantic relationships, recognizing that emotions and ER mostly emerge in close relationships. A total of 138 participants in romantic relationships were interviewed using the ERI-RF, and second interviews were conducted with 31 of the participants for the assessment of test-retest reliability. Results showed that the ERI-RF had good validity results, and the use of some ER strategies to certain emotions demonstrated sufficient test-retest reliability. It was concluded that the ERI-RF, as an assessment tool for the evaluation of a wide range of ER strategies based on the most frequently experienced emotions, has sufficient psychometric properties, and that its use in different samples in feature studies may yield useful results."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的情绪调节评估工具:情绪调节访谈-修订表格
“本研究的主要目的是将情绪调节访谈(ERI)改编为土耳其语,并检查其心理测量特性,同时通过扩展其在情绪,情绪调节(ER)策略以及与ER策略相关的功效测量方面的范围来修改它。”为此,我们对原来的面试表进行了各种调整,形成了情绪调节面试修订表(ERI-RF)。ERI-RF评估了在浪漫关系中经历的情绪调节(即焦虑,悲伤,愤怒),认识到情绪和ER大多出现在亲密关系中。采用ERI-RF对138名恋爱关系参与者进行了访谈,并对其中31名参与者进行了二次访谈,以评估重测信度。结果表明,erf量表具有较好的效度结果,部分erf策略对某些情绪的应用具有足够的重测信度。我们得出的结论是,ERI-RF作为一种评估工具,可以基于最常见的体验情绪来评估广泛的ER策略,具有足够的心理测量学特性,并且在特征研究的不同样本中使用它可能会产生有用的结果。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal is devoted to the advancement of the clinical theory and practice of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBP) (e.g., evidence-based psychological assessments, evidence-based psychological treatments). The journal publishes original papers dealing with EBP and psychology, psychiatry, the medical and mental specialties, and allied areas of science.
期刊最新文献
Social Anxiety from an Attachment Theory Perspective: The Mediating Role of Early Maladaptive Schema Domains and Rejection Sensitivity Mental health literacy: A Survey of the Public’s Ability to Recognize Mental Disorders and Their Knowledge about the Effectiveness of Helpful Interventions to Help the Victims The Longitudinal Mediating Effect of Distress Tolerance in a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial Mindfulness and Self-compassion Decrease Emotional Symptoms, Self-criticism, Rumination and Worry in College Students: A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Group Self-compassion-based Interventions Effect of Training on Beliefs About Exposure Therapy in Experienced Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1