U.S. parent perspectives on media guidance from pediatric autism professionals

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Children and Media Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/17482798.2020.1736111
M. Alper
{"title":"U.S. parent perspectives on media guidance from pediatric autism professionals","authors":"M. Alper","doi":"10.1080/17482798.2020.1736111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Screen media guidelines for children set by medical organizations (e.g., the American Academy of Pediatrics) play a significant role in public discourse regarding media and parenting. Physician mediation theory, an adaptation of parental mediation theory, suggests that physician-patient discussion about media content (e.g., online searches) directly shapes patient engagement with said content. Little attention has been paid though as to how guidance about children’s media use is delivered to parents by pediatric clinical professionals and its utility from the perspective of diverse families. Interviews and home observations were conducted with families of 26 children ages 3–13 on the autism spectrum. Two main social contexts for media guidance were identified: advising on children’s media use 1) as part of therapy and 2) as recreation. Prior research indicates that physician mediation takes three forms: positive (encouraging media use), negative (discouraging), and redirective (suggesting alternatives). Within the two contexts, positive physician mediation was more prominent in therapeutic than recreational contexts. Poor and working-class families also tended to report media guidance less than upper- and middle-class families, partly due to barriers in accessing clinical care. Implications are discussed for improving physician mediation theory as well as enhancing caregiver-clinician communication about children’s media use.","PeriodicalId":46908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children and Media","volume":"15 1","pages":"165 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17482798.2020.1736111","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children and Media","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1736111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Screen media guidelines for children set by medical organizations (e.g., the American Academy of Pediatrics) play a significant role in public discourse regarding media and parenting. Physician mediation theory, an adaptation of parental mediation theory, suggests that physician-patient discussion about media content (e.g., online searches) directly shapes patient engagement with said content. Little attention has been paid though as to how guidance about children’s media use is delivered to parents by pediatric clinical professionals and its utility from the perspective of diverse families. Interviews and home observations were conducted with families of 26 children ages 3–13 on the autism spectrum. Two main social contexts for media guidance were identified: advising on children’s media use 1) as part of therapy and 2) as recreation. Prior research indicates that physician mediation takes three forms: positive (encouraging media use), negative (discouraging), and redirective (suggesting alternatives). Within the two contexts, positive physician mediation was more prominent in therapeutic than recreational contexts. Poor and working-class families also tended to report media guidance less than upper- and middle-class families, partly due to barriers in accessing clinical care. Implications are discussed for improving physician mediation theory as well as enhancing caregiver-clinician communication about children’s media use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国家长对儿童自闭症专业人士媒体指导的看法
由医疗机构(如美国儿科学会)制定的儿童屏幕媒体指南在有关媒体和育儿的公共话语中发挥着重要作用。医生调解理论是对父母调解理论的一种改编,它认为医患之间关于媒体内容(例如,在线搜索)的讨论直接影响了患者对所述内容的参与。然而,很少有人关注儿科临床专业人员如何向家长提供有关儿童媒体使用的指导,以及从不同家庭的角度来看其效用。对26个年龄在3-13岁的自闭症儿童的家庭进行了访谈和家庭观察。媒体指导的两个主要社会背景被确定:对儿童媒体使用的建议:1)作为治疗的一部分,2)作为娱乐。先前的研究表明,医生调解有三种形式:积极的(鼓励媒体使用),消极的(劝阻)和重新指导(建议替代方案)。在这两种情境中,积极的医生调解在治疗情境中比在娱乐情境中更为突出。贫困和工薪阶层家庭也倾向于比中上层家庭更少地报告媒体指导,部分原因是在获得临床护理方面存在障碍。本研究对改善医师调解理论及加强护理人员与临床医师在儿童媒体使用方面的沟通具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Parental mediation and children’s digital well-being in family life in Norway The paradox of play: How Dutch children develop digital literacy via offline engagement with digital media Playfully building resilience: Dutch children’s risk-managing tactics in digital risky play Measuring digital well-being in everyday life among Slovenian adolescents: The Perceived Digital Well-Being in Adolescence Scale Factors influencing young people’s news consumption in Switzerland during normative transitions: A mixed methods study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1