Ryan Lagerquist, David D. Turner, I. Ebert‐Uphoff, J. Stewart
{"title":"Estimating full longwave and shortwave radiative transfer with neural networks of varying complexity","authors":"Ryan Lagerquist, David D. Turner, I. Ebert‐Uphoff, J. Stewart","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-23-0012.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nRadiative transfer (RT) is a crucial but computationally expensive process in numerical weather/climate prediction. We develop neural networks (NN) to emulate a common RT parameterization called the Rapid Radiative-transfer Model (RRTM), with the goal of creating a faster parameterization for the Global Forecast System (GFS) v16. In previous work we emulated a highly simplified version of the shortwave RRTM only – excluding many predictor variables, driven by Rapid Refresh forecasts interpolated to a consistent height grid, using only 30 sites in the northern hemisphere. In this work we emulate the full shortwave and longwave RRTM – with all predictor variables, driven by GFSv16 forecasts on the native pressure-sigma grid, using data from around the globe. We experiment with NNs of widely varying complexity, including the U-net++ and U-net3+ architectures and deeply supervised training, designed to ensure realistic and accurate structure in gridded predictions. We evaluate the optimal shortwave NN and optimal longwave NN in great detail – as a function of geographic location, cloud regime, and other weather types. Both NNs produce extremely reliable heating rates and fluxes. The shortwave NN has an overall RMSE/MAE/bias of 0.14/0.08/-0.002 K day−1 for heating rate and 6.3/4.3/-0.1 W m−2 for net flux. Analogous numbers for the longwave NN are 0.22/0.12/-0.0006 K day−1 and 1.07/0.76/+0.01 W m−2. Both NNs perform well in nearly all situations, and the shortwave (longwave) NN is 7510 (90) times faster than the RRTM. Both will soon be tested online in the GFSv16.","PeriodicalId":15074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-23-0012.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Radiative transfer (RT) is a crucial but computationally expensive process in numerical weather/climate prediction. We develop neural networks (NN) to emulate a common RT parameterization called the Rapid Radiative-transfer Model (RRTM), with the goal of creating a faster parameterization for the Global Forecast System (GFS) v16. In previous work we emulated a highly simplified version of the shortwave RRTM only – excluding many predictor variables, driven by Rapid Refresh forecasts interpolated to a consistent height grid, using only 30 sites in the northern hemisphere. In this work we emulate the full shortwave and longwave RRTM – with all predictor variables, driven by GFSv16 forecasts on the native pressure-sigma grid, using data from around the globe. We experiment with NNs of widely varying complexity, including the U-net++ and U-net3+ architectures and deeply supervised training, designed to ensure realistic and accurate structure in gridded predictions. We evaluate the optimal shortwave NN and optimal longwave NN in great detail – as a function of geographic location, cloud regime, and other weather types. Both NNs produce extremely reliable heating rates and fluxes. The shortwave NN has an overall RMSE/MAE/bias of 0.14/0.08/-0.002 K day−1 for heating rate and 6.3/4.3/-0.1 W m−2 for net flux. Analogous numbers for the longwave NN are 0.22/0.12/-0.0006 K day−1 and 1.07/0.76/+0.01 W m−2. Both NNs perform well in nearly all situations, and the shortwave (longwave) NN is 7510 (90) times faster than the RRTM. Both will soon be tested online in the GFSv16.
在数值天气/气候预报中,辐射传输是一个重要但计算代价昂贵的过程。我们开发了神经网络(NN)来模拟称为快速辐射传输模型(RRTM)的常见RT参数化,目标是为全球预报系统(GFS) v16创建更快的参数化。在之前的工作中,我们只模拟了一个高度简化的短波RRTM版本——排除了许多预测变量,由快速刷新预测驱动,插值到一致的高度网格,仅使用北半球的30个站点。在这项工作中,我们模拟了全短波和长波RRTM -所有预测变量,由GFSv16在本地压力-西格玛网格上的预测驱动,使用来自全球的数据。我们对复杂程度变化很大的神经网络进行了实验,包括u -net++和U-net3+架构以及深度监督训练,旨在确保网格预测结构的真实性和准确性。我们非常详细地评估了最优短波神经网络和最优长波神经网络——作为地理位置、云状况和其他天气类型的函数。两种神经网络都能产生非常可靠的加热速率和通量。短波神经网络的加热速率的总体RMSE/MAE/偏差为0.14/0.08/-0.002 K day - 1,净通量的RMSE/MAE/偏差为6.3/4.3/-0.1 W m - 2。长波神经网络的类似数字为0.22/0.12/-0.0006 K day - 1和1.07/0.76/+0.01 W m - 2。两种神经网络在几乎所有情况下都表现良好,短波(长波)神经网络比RRTM快7510(90)倍。两者都将很快在GFSv16上进行在线测试。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology (JTECH) publishes research describing instrumentation and methods used in atmospheric and oceanic research, including remote sensing instruments; measurements, validation, and data analysis techniques from satellites, aircraft, balloons, and surface-based platforms; in situ instruments, measurements, and methods for data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation and assimilation in numerical models; and information systems and algorithms.