French translation and validation of the Karitane Parenting Confidence Scale

Maria-Hélène Ribeiro, Nathalie Coulon, Alain Guerrien
{"title":"French translation and validation of the Karitane Parenting Confidence Scale","authors":"Maria-Hélène Ribeiro,&nbsp;Nathalie Coulon,&nbsp;Alain Guerrien","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2022.100759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Perceived parental self-efficacy (PSE) is thought to play a crucial role in parental well-being, the parent-infant relationship, and other aspects of infant development, particularly in the early postnatal period. The Karitane Parenting Confidence Scale (KPCS) is a 15-item self-report questionnaire designed for parents with infants aged 0–12<!--> <!-->months.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the factor structure of a French translation of the KPCS and assess its psychometric qualities.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Using a French-language translation of the KPCS (KPCS-F), 257 parents of children aged 0–12<!--> <span>months were recruited via childcare structures (e.g. nurseries, community centers, mother and child protection centers). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted to examine 2- and 3-factor solutions for the KPCS-F scale. Internal reliability and convergent validity were evaluated.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The best model was a two-factor solution (PSE “infant care” and PSE “parental role”) restricted to 12 items. Sound internal consistency was indicated, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.80 and a McDonald's omega coefficient of 0.80. Test-retest reliability was good. KPCS-F score was correlated with social support and psychological well-being scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The KPCS-F showed substantial validity and reliability for this sample. The translated scale should therefore improve assessment and intervention processes for professionals working with parents of young children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"72 3","pages":"Article 100759"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S116290882200010X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Perceived parental self-efficacy (PSE) is thought to play a crucial role in parental well-being, the parent-infant relationship, and other aspects of infant development, particularly in the early postnatal period. The Karitane Parenting Confidence Scale (KPCS) is a 15-item self-report questionnaire designed for parents with infants aged 0–12 months.

Objective

To explore the factor structure of a French translation of the KPCS and assess its psychometric qualities.

Method

Using a French-language translation of the KPCS (KPCS-F), 257 parents of children aged 0–12 months were recruited via childcare structures (e.g. nurseries, community centers, mother and child protection centers). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted to examine 2- and 3-factor solutions for the KPCS-F scale. Internal reliability and convergent validity were evaluated.

Results

The best model was a two-factor solution (PSE “infant care” and PSE “parental role”) restricted to 12 items. Sound internal consistency was indicated, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.80 and a McDonald's omega coefficient of 0.80. Test-retest reliability was good. KPCS-F score was correlated with social support and psychological well-being scores.

Conclusion

The KPCS-F showed substantial validity and reliability for this sample. The translated scale should therefore improve assessment and intervention processes for professionals working with parents of young children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Karitane父母信心量表的法语翻译与验证
父母自我效能感(PSE)被认为在父母幸福感、亲子关系和婴儿发展的其他方面起着至关重要的作用,尤其是在出生后的早期。Karitane父母信心量表(KPCS)是一份15个项目的自我报告问卷,专为0-12个月婴儿的父母设计。目的探讨一篇《KPCS》法文译本的因子结构,并评价其心理测量质量。方法采用KPCS- f (KPCS- f)的法文译本,通过托儿机构(如托儿所、社区中心、母婴保护中心)招募了257名0-12月龄儿童的家长。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)来检验KPCS-F量表的2因子和3因子解决方案。评估了内部信度和收敛效度。结果最优模型为限制在12项的双因素解(PSE“婴儿护理”和PSE“父母角色”)。具有良好的内部一致性,Cronbach's alpha系数为0.80,McDonald's omega系数为0.80。重测信度良好。KPCS-F得分与社会支持和心理健康得分相关。结论KPCS-F对该样本具有较高的效度和信度。因此,翻译后的量表应改善与幼儿父母一起工作的专业人员的评估和干预程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The aim of the Revue européenne de Psychologie appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology is to promote high-quality applications of psychology to all areas of specialization, and to foster exchange among researchers and professionals. Its policy is to attract a wide range of contributions, including empirical research, overviews of target issues, case studies, descriptions of instruments for research and diagnosis, and theoretical work related to applied psychology. In all cases, authors will refer to published and verificable facts, whether established in the study being reported or in earlier publications.
期刊最新文献
Relationship status-mental health concerns association: An examination of attachment and attention Attachment insecurity, bullying victimisation in the workplace, and the experience of burnout Study of the psychometric properties of the French version of the Caregiving System Scale Trait authenticity as an “enzyme” for personal resources and work engagement: A study among teachers within the framework of the job demands-resources model Guilt-proneness and self-management behaviour: The moderating role of sense of belonging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1