Using the Muses to Ease Distance Learning Transactions

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Continuing Higher Education Pub Date : 2019-09-02 DOI:10.1080/07377363.2019.1664805
M. Schulte
{"title":"Using the Muses to Ease Distance Learning Transactions","authors":"M. Schulte","doi":"10.1080/07377363.2019.1664805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A few months ago, for my professional job at Pearson Online Learning Services, I co-conducted a training that covered online engineering program accreditation, education requirements, and licensure. Yes, it was scintillating (full sarcasm intended). While the topic was not riveting for most people, the training was necessary to assist online student support advisors who needed to reference specific information as they talked to prospective engineering students. As a necessary balm for the heavy content, the end of the training included a short section titled “How to talk to an engineer.” The purpose of this section, while peppered with some humor, was to assist the online advisors with practical tips to converse with engineers. The online advisors had experienced difficulties in conversations and e-mails with these prospective students, noting that the engineers would be curt, find a conversation about the school’s sport teams to be a waste of time (small talk), or not include socially accepted niceties such as “Have a nice day” or “I appreciate your help.” It is no secret that some people with certain technical expertise and minds struggle with what others take for granted as normal communications and interactions. There have been a number of peerreviewed published papers which address scientific individuals who struggle with casual communication and social expectations. My short piece for the advisor training, however, relied on non-published online articles and informative blog postings. After the training, I moved on to other projects. But my mind kept returning to the item on communicating with engineers. I surmised that this issue might not be confined to just engineering, but to other disciplines and professions as well. As further inspiration that this was not a unique phenomenon, I was struggling with a very artistic person who seemed incapable of staying on track with his work. All our transactions, due to geographical location, were at a distance (phone, e-mail, text pictures). Phone communications were often strained because his explanations seemed to wander, as can occur with an open and fluid worldview. Frustratingly, the person would fail to take notes and direction, yet he was working on a major construction effort! This person had some of the best design skills I had ever witnessed, enhancing already created building plans with an artistic change here and there that resulted in beauty and function. His ability to see art and use science in his work was a definite asset. However, he seemed to bounce from task to task and often would not fully complete a project, much less on time. It seemed to me that his artistic, fluid, and open predilection interfered with completing a project. In a different span of time, I also seemed to be inundated with examples of poor communication in both verbal and written form: online applications and instructions that seemed to lead nowhere in very Kafka-esque fashion; directions for a community event that did not include basic information about times and parking; and my least favorite, a toll pass company which had created communication silos with its online billing wing so that neither group could access the others’ information and address my concerns. At first, I thought it was solely my problem, that I was the one confused or limited in understanding. But conversations with friends and family led me to believe","PeriodicalId":44549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07377363.2019.1664805","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2019.1664805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A few months ago, for my professional job at Pearson Online Learning Services, I co-conducted a training that covered online engineering program accreditation, education requirements, and licensure. Yes, it was scintillating (full sarcasm intended). While the topic was not riveting for most people, the training was necessary to assist online student support advisors who needed to reference specific information as they talked to prospective engineering students. As a necessary balm for the heavy content, the end of the training included a short section titled “How to talk to an engineer.” The purpose of this section, while peppered with some humor, was to assist the online advisors with practical tips to converse with engineers. The online advisors had experienced difficulties in conversations and e-mails with these prospective students, noting that the engineers would be curt, find a conversation about the school’s sport teams to be a waste of time (small talk), or not include socially accepted niceties such as “Have a nice day” or “I appreciate your help.” It is no secret that some people with certain technical expertise and minds struggle with what others take for granted as normal communications and interactions. There have been a number of peerreviewed published papers which address scientific individuals who struggle with casual communication and social expectations. My short piece for the advisor training, however, relied on non-published online articles and informative blog postings. After the training, I moved on to other projects. But my mind kept returning to the item on communicating with engineers. I surmised that this issue might not be confined to just engineering, but to other disciplines and professions as well. As further inspiration that this was not a unique phenomenon, I was struggling with a very artistic person who seemed incapable of staying on track with his work. All our transactions, due to geographical location, were at a distance (phone, e-mail, text pictures). Phone communications were often strained because his explanations seemed to wander, as can occur with an open and fluid worldview. Frustratingly, the person would fail to take notes and direction, yet he was working on a major construction effort! This person had some of the best design skills I had ever witnessed, enhancing already created building plans with an artistic change here and there that resulted in beauty and function. His ability to see art and use science in his work was a definite asset. However, he seemed to bounce from task to task and often would not fully complete a project, much less on time. It seemed to me that his artistic, fluid, and open predilection interfered with completing a project. In a different span of time, I also seemed to be inundated with examples of poor communication in both verbal and written form: online applications and instructions that seemed to lead nowhere in very Kafka-esque fashion; directions for a community event that did not include basic information about times and parking; and my least favorite, a toll pass company which had created communication silos with its online billing wing so that neither group could access the others’ information and address my concerns. At first, I thought it was solely my problem, that I was the one confused or limited in understanding. But conversations with friends and family led me to believe
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用Muses简化远程学习事务
几个月前,为了我在培生在线学习服务公司的专业工作,我参与了一项培训,内容包括在线工程项目认证、教育要求和许可证。是的,它闪烁着光芒(充满讽刺意味)。虽然这个话题对大多数人来说并不吸引人,但培训对于帮助在线学生支持顾问是必要的,他们在与未来的工程学生交谈时需要参考特定信息。作为对繁重内容的必要安慰,培训的最后包括一个题为“如何与工程师交谈”的简短部分。这一部分的目的虽然充满了幽默,但旨在为在线顾问提供与工程师交谈的实用技巧。在线顾问在与这些潜在学生的对话和电子邮件中遇到了困难,他们指出,工程师们会很粗鲁,认为关于学校运动队的对话是浪费时间(闲聊),或者不包括社会认可的细节,比如“祝你一天愉快”或“我感谢你的帮助”。“一些具有一定技术专长和头脑的人在与其他人认为理所当然的正常沟通和互动作斗争,这已经不是什么秘密了。已经发表了许多经过同行评审的论文,这些论文针对的是那些在随意交流和社会期望中挣扎的科学人士。然而,我关于顾问培训的短文依赖于未发表的在线文章和信息丰富的博客文章。培训结束后,我开始了其他项目。但我的思绪一直回到与工程师沟通的问题上。我推测,这个问题可能不仅限于工程,还包括其他学科和专业。这并不是一个独特的现象,这进一步激励了我,我正在与一个非常有艺术感的人作斗争,他似乎无法坚持自己的作品。由于地理位置的原因,我们所有的交易都是远距离的(电话、电子邮件、文字图片)。电话交流经常很紧张,因为他的解释似乎很随意,就像开放和流动的世界观一样。令人沮丧的是,这个人不会记笔记和指示,但他正在进行一项重大的建设工作!这个人拥有我所见过的最好的设计技能,通过艺术上的改变来增强已经创建的建筑平面图,从而产生美感和功能。他在作品中看到艺术和运用科学的能力无疑是一笔财富。然而,他似乎从一项任务跳到另一项任务,经常无法完全完成一个项目,更不用说按时完成了。在我看来,他的艺术性、流畅性和开放性的偏好干扰了一个项目的完成。在另一段时间里,我似乎也被言语和书面形式的糟糕沟通淹没了:在线应用程序和指令似乎以卡夫卡式的方式毫无进展;不包括时间和停车基本信息的社区活动指示;还有我最不喜欢的一家收费公司,它与在线计费部门建立了通信竖井,这样两个小组都无法访问其他人的信息并解决我的担忧。起初,我认为这只是我的问题,我是一个困惑或理解有限的人。但与朋友和家人的交谈让我相信
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Continuing Higher Education
Journal of Continuing Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nontraditional Students and Credit for Prior Learning—Analytical Thinking, Clout, Drives, and Motives The Relations Among Math Anxiety, Math Self-Construct, and Math Achievement in Older and Underserved Minority Students Examining the Perception of Military Culture in the Undergraduate University Classroom The Formation and Benefits of Communal Cohorts in an EdD Program Notes and Trends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1