{"title":"Universal Screening to Detect Emotional and Behavioral Risk Among English Language Learners","authors":"Imelda Murrieta, Katie Eklund","doi":"10.1080/2372966X.2021.1984169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Universal screening for emotional and behavioral risk (EBR) within K–12 schools can identify students who might benefit from interventions within Multitiered Systems of Support. As few studies have examined emotional and behavioral risk levels for English Language Learners, the present study used a brief behavior rating scale to examine EBR rates among elementary-aged ELLs and non-ELLs as rated by their classroom teachers. EBR was also examined according to students’ language classifications (i.e., Initial Fluent English Proficient [IFEP], Reclassified, ELL, or English-Only) and gender. Study results demonstrated no relationship between student’s ELL status or language classification and the identification of EBR. However, a significant relationship was found between gender and the identification of EBR among all students, where a higher number of males demonstrated EBR. In addition, students’ reading ability, age, and gender predicted whether ELL and non-ELL students would be identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral concerns. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. Impact Summary The current study provides initial evidence demonstrating that student levels of English language proficiency does not differentially contribute to the identification of students with emotional and behavioral risk using a universal behavior screening measure in an elementary student sample. A logistic regression analysis determined students’ reading ability, age, and gender predicted whether ELL and non-ELL students would be identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral concerns.","PeriodicalId":21555,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"441 - 453"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1984169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract Universal screening for emotional and behavioral risk (EBR) within K–12 schools can identify students who might benefit from interventions within Multitiered Systems of Support. As few studies have examined emotional and behavioral risk levels for English Language Learners, the present study used a brief behavior rating scale to examine EBR rates among elementary-aged ELLs and non-ELLs as rated by their classroom teachers. EBR was also examined according to students’ language classifications (i.e., Initial Fluent English Proficient [IFEP], Reclassified, ELL, or English-Only) and gender. Study results demonstrated no relationship between student’s ELL status or language classification and the identification of EBR. However, a significant relationship was found between gender and the identification of EBR among all students, where a higher number of males demonstrated EBR. In addition, students’ reading ability, age, and gender predicted whether ELL and non-ELL students would be identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral concerns. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. Impact Summary The current study provides initial evidence demonstrating that student levels of English language proficiency does not differentially contribute to the identification of students with emotional and behavioral risk using a universal behavior screening measure in an elementary student sample. A logistic regression analysis determined students’ reading ability, age, and gender predicted whether ELL and non-ELL students would be identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral concerns.
期刊介绍:
School Psychology Review (SPR) is a refereed journal published quarterly by NASP. Its primary purpose is to provide a means for communicating scholarly advances in research, training, and practice related to psychology and education, and specifically to school psychology. Of particular interest are articles presenting original, data-based research that can contribute to the development of innovative intervention and prevention strategies and the evaluation of these approaches. SPR presents important conceptual developments and empirical findings from a wide range of disciplines (e.g., educational, child clinical, pediatric, community.