{"title":"A service evaluation examining the requirement for Level 2 critical care in a major trauma centre","authors":"P. Galea, K. Joyce, Sarah Galea, F. Loughnane","doi":"10.22541/au.164175447.73916057/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical care provision is fundamental in all developed health systems\nin which severe disease and injury is managed. This is especially true\nin major trauma centres and high-acuity establishments, where acutely\nunstable patients can be admitted at any time, requiring clinical\nmonitoring and interventions appropriate for their burden of illness.\nThis single-centre, prospective service evaluation applied validated\nscoring systems to a surgical population, sampling and following those\nconsidered “high-risk” through to discharge or death, alongside all\nintensive care unit (ICU) admissions during 2019. Primarily we aimed to\nquantify the number of patients objectively suitable for Level 2\ncritical care, conventionally provided in a high-dependency unit (HDU)\nsetting. Secondary outcome measures included ICU readmission rate,\nin-hospital mortality, and delays to ICU admission and discharge. Of the\n“high-risk” surgical patients, more than eight per week were found to\nhave peri-operative Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity\nScore for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) scores\nthat would advocate critical care admission. Only one individual\nreceived scheduled peri-operative critical care. Post-operative\nmortality in this group was 6.1%, though none of these patients was\nadmitted to ICU prior to death. There were 605 ICU admissions in 2019,\nwith 32.1% of admitted days spent at the equivalent of Level 2 critical\ncare, which could have been administered in a HDU if one was available.\nThe ICU readmission rate was 6.45%. This data demonstrates substantial\nunmet critical care needs, with patients not uncommonly managed in\nclinically inappropriate areas for extended periods due to delays\naccessing ICU. A designated HDU may mitigate clinical risk from this\nsubgroup, reducing morbidity and in-hospital mortality, and this\nmethodology for assessing requirements could be used in other similar\ninstitutions.","PeriodicalId":73881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22541/au.164175447.73916057/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Critical care provision is fundamental in all developed health systems
in which severe disease and injury is managed. This is especially true
in major trauma centres and high-acuity establishments, where acutely
unstable patients can be admitted at any time, requiring clinical
monitoring and interventions appropriate for their burden of illness.
This single-centre, prospective service evaluation applied validated
scoring systems to a surgical population, sampling and following those
considered “high-risk” through to discharge or death, alongside all
intensive care unit (ICU) admissions during 2019. Primarily we aimed to
quantify the number of patients objectively suitable for Level 2
critical care, conventionally provided in a high-dependency unit (HDU)
setting. Secondary outcome measures included ICU readmission rate,
in-hospital mortality, and delays to ICU admission and discharge. Of the
“high-risk” surgical patients, more than eight per week were found to
have peri-operative Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity
Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) scores
that would advocate critical care admission. Only one individual
received scheduled peri-operative critical care. Post-operative
mortality in this group was 6.1%, though none of these patients was
admitted to ICU prior to death. There were 605 ICU admissions in 2019,
with 32.1% of admitted days spent at the equivalent of Level 2 critical
care, which could have been administered in a HDU if one was available.
The ICU readmission rate was 6.45%. This data demonstrates substantial
unmet critical care needs, with patients not uncommonly managed in
clinically inappropriate areas for extended periods due to delays
accessing ICU. A designated HDU may mitigate clinical risk from this
subgroup, reducing morbidity and in-hospital mortality, and this
methodology for assessing requirements could be used in other similar
institutions.