A Machine Learning Approach to Estimate Geo-mechanical Parameters from Core Samples: A Comparative Approach

Jwngsar Brahma
{"title":"A Machine Learning Approach to Estimate Geo-mechanical Parameters from Core Samples: A Comparative Approach","authors":"Jwngsar Brahma","doi":"10.37394/232011.2023.18.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geo-mechanical parameters and Thomsen parameters play very important roles to design a stable wellbore in a challenging environment. The main objective of this paper is to estimate Thomsen's parameters (ε, γ, δ) and geo-mechanical properties from the core samples by Machine Learning and a comparative analysis with the conventional mathematical approach; to place emphasis on the use of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in the Oil & Gas industry and to highlight its future potential to help in the digital transformation of the industry. Two different Machine Learning models, the Ordinary Least Square method and the Random Forest method, were used to predict the aforementioned geo-mechanical properties from the wave velocity and confining pressure data. In this study, it has been observed that the approaches employed in the estimate of geo-mechanical properties are rapid and reliable (about 93.5 percent accuracy) and may be applied in geo-mechanical modeling for wellbore stability analysis for safe and cost-effective well plan and design on a large scale. The analysis in this work indicates that Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio are heavily influenced by the anisotropy parameters. Finally, a comparison is made with mathematical approaches. The machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches shown here are excellently matched with mathematical approaches. The geo-mechanical parameters and Thomsen parameters and be computed with reasonable accuracy with the help of our proposed ML algorithms. Our proposed ML model can predict the geo-mechanical parameters and Thomsen parameters from the velocity profile directly without complex mathematical computation. The mathematical model would have required us to first determine the stiffness constants for the prediction of that parameters. Additionally, we may conclude that a machine learning model needs to be trained with more modeling data to predict the right values with a smaller error margin. The number of data points required to train a model has a significant impact on the model's overall accuracy. Therefore, additional modeling data is needed to learn about and comprehend the intricacies, patterns, and interactions between provided input and output variables.","PeriodicalId":53603,"journal":{"name":"WSEAS Transactions on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WSEAS Transactions on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37394/232011.2023.18.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geo-mechanical parameters and Thomsen parameters play very important roles to design a stable wellbore in a challenging environment. The main objective of this paper is to estimate Thomsen's parameters (ε, γ, δ) and geo-mechanical properties from the core samples by Machine Learning and a comparative analysis with the conventional mathematical approach; to place emphasis on the use of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in the Oil & Gas industry and to highlight its future potential to help in the digital transformation of the industry. Two different Machine Learning models, the Ordinary Least Square method and the Random Forest method, were used to predict the aforementioned geo-mechanical properties from the wave velocity and confining pressure data. In this study, it has been observed that the approaches employed in the estimate of geo-mechanical properties are rapid and reliable (about 93.5 percent accuracy) and may be applied in geo-mechanical modeling for wellbore stability analysis for safe and cost-effective well plan and design on a large scale. The analysis in this work indicates that Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio are heavily influenced by the anisotropy parameters. Finally, a comparison is made with mathematical approaches. The machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches shown here are excellently matched with mathematical approaches. The geo-mechanical parameters and Thomsen parameters and be computed with reasonable accuracy with the help of our proposed ML algorithms. Our proposed ML model can predict the geo-mechanical parameters and Thomsen parameters from the velocity profile directly without complex mathematical computation. The mathematical model would have required us to first determine the stiffness constants for the prediction of that parameters. Additionally, we may conclude that a machine learning model needs to be trained with more modeling data to predict the right values with a smaller error margin. The number of data points required to train a model has a significant impact on the model's overall accuracy. Therefore, additional modeling data is needed to learn about and comprehend the intricacies, patterns, and interactions between provided input and output variables.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从岩心样本中估计岩土力学参数的机器学习方法:一种比较方法
地质力学参数和汤姆森参数对于在具有挑战性的环境中设计稳定的井筒起着非常重要的作用。本文的主要目的是通过机器学习和与传统数学方法的比较分析,从岩心样本中估计Thomsen参数(ε、γ、δ)和地质力学性质;强调机器学习和人工智能在石油和天然气行业的应用,并强调其未来帮助行业数字化转型的潜力。使用两种不同的机器学习模型,普通最小二乘法和随机森林法,根据波速和围压数据预测上述地质力学特性。在这项研究中,已经观察到,用于估计地质力学性质的方法是快速可靠的(约93.5%的准确率),并且可以应用于地质力学建模,用于井筒稳定性分析,以进行大规模的安全和经济高效的井规划和设计。本文的分析表明,各向异性参数对杨氏模量和泊松比有很大影响。最后,与数学方法进行了比较。这里展示的机器学习和人工智能方法与数学方法非常匹配。地质力学参数和Thomsen参数,并在我们提出的ML算法的帮助下以合理的精度进行计算。我们提出的ML模型可以直接从速度剖面预测地质力学参数和Thomsen参数,而无需复杂的数学计算。数学模型要求我们首先确定用于预测该参数的刚度常数。此外,我们可以得出结论,机器学习模型需要用更多的建模数据进行训练,以预测误差较小的正确值。训练模型所需的数据点数量对模型的整体准确性有很大影响。因此,需要额外的建模数据来了解和理解所提供的输入和输出变量之间的复杂性、模式和交互。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
WSEAS Transactions on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics
WSEAS Transactions on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics Engineering-Computational Mechanics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: WSEAS Transactions on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics publishes original research papers relating to computational and experimental mechanics. We aim to bring important work to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers of exceptional scientific value that advance our understanding of these particular areas. The research presented must transcend the limits of case studies, while both experimental and theoretical studies are accepted. It is a multi-disciplinary journal and therefore its content mirrors the diverse interests and approaches of scholars involved with fluid-structure interaction, impact and multibody dynamics, nonlinear dynamics, structural dynamics and related areas. We also welcome scholarly contributions from officials with government agencies, international agencies, and non-governmental organizations.
期刊最新文献
Reduction of Input Torque and Joint Reactions in High-Speed Mechanical Systems with Reciprocating Motion Modeling the Normal Contact Characteristics between Components Joined in Multi-Bolted Systems Structural Investigation of Drini River Bridges, Case Study of Structures Analyses Stability of Beam Bridges Under Bridge-Vehicle Interaction Effect of Earthquake-Induced Structural Pounding on the Floor Accelerations and Floor Response Spectra of Adjacent Building Structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1