THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS ON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH GUIDED INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING APPROACH

L. A. Purwasi
{"title":"THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS ON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH GUIDED INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING APPROACH","authors":"L. A. Purwasi","doi":"10.26418/jpmipa.v11i2.40859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was aimed to determine the development levels of higher-order thinking skills on students through the guided inquiry-based learning approach. The research method used was experimental, with true empirical design research. The sample selection was performed by random sampling technique. Data was collected through five tests of essay forms in accordance with various indicators of higher-order thinking abilities, including analysing (C4), evaluating (C5) and creating (C6). The results of this study indicated that the percentage of higher-order thinking ability in the experimental class was 86%, while in the control class was lower, at 79.3%. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that students with higher-order thinking skills taught through this guided inquiry-based learning were superior compared to those taught by conventional learning.AbstractThis study was aimed to determine the development levels of higher-order thinking skills on students through the guided inquiry-based learning approach. The research method used was experimental, with true empirical design research. The sample selection was performed by random sampling technique. Data was collected through five tests of essay forms in accordance with various indicators of higher-order thinking abilities, including analysing (C4), evaluating (C5) and creating (C6). The results of this study indicated that the percentage of higher-order thinking ability in the experimental class was 86%, while in the control class was lower, at 79.3%. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that students with higher-order thinking skills taught through this guided inquiry-based learning were superior compared to those taught by conventional learning.Keywords: Guided Inquiry-based Learning, Conventional Learning, Higher-Order Thinking Skills","PeriodicalId":31449,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v11i2.40859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This study was aimed to determine the development levels of higher-order thinking skills on students through the guided inquiry-based learning approach. The research method used was experimental, with true empirical design research. The sample selection was performed by random sampling technique. Data was collected through five tests of essay forms in accordance with various indicators of higher-order thinking abilities, including analysing (C4), evaluating (C5) and creating (C6). The results of this study indicated that the percentage of higher-order thinking ability in the experimental class was 86%, while in the control class was lower, at 79.3%. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that students with higher-order thinking skills taught through this guided inquiry-based learning were superior compared to those taught by conventional learning.AbstractThis study was aimed to determine the development levels of higher-order thinking skills on students through the guided inquiry-based learning approach. The research method used was experimental, with true empirical design research. The sample selection was performed by random sampling technique. Data was collected through five tests of essay forms in accordance with various indicators of higher-order thinking abilities, including analysing (C4), evaluating (C5) and creating (C6). The results of this study indicated that the percentage of higher-order thinking ability in the experimental class was 86%, while in the control class was lower, at 79.3%. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that students with higher-order thinking skills taught through this guided inquiry-based learning were superior compared to those taught by conventional learning.Keywords: Guided Inquiry-based Learning, Conventional Learning, Higher-Order Thinking Skills
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引导式探究式学习对初中生高阶思维能力的培养
本研究旨在探讨探究性学习方法对学生高阶思维能力发展的影响。本研究采用实验方法,采用真正的实证设计研究。样本选择采用随机抽样技术。根据分析(C4)、评价(C5)和创造(C6)等各种高阶思维能力指标,通过五次论文形式测试收集数据。本研究结果表明,实验班学生具有高阶思维能力的比例为86%,而控制班学生具有低阶思维能力的比例为79.3%。基于本研究的结果,我们得出结论,通过这种引导的探究性学习方式培养出高阶思维技能的学生比传统学习方式培养出的学生更优秀。摘要本研究旨在通过引导探究性学习方法,了解学生高阶思维技能的发展水平。本研究采用实验方法,采用真正的实证设计研究。样本选择采用随机抽样技术。根据分析(C4)、评价(C5)和创造(C6)等各种高阶思维能力指标,通过五次论文形式测试收集数据。本研究结果表明,实验班学生具有高阶思维能力的比例为86%,而控制班学生具有低阶思维能力的比例为79.3%。基于本研究的结果,我们得出结论,通过这种引导的探究性学习方式培养出高阶思维技能的学生比传统学习方式培养出的学生更优秀。关键词:引导式探究式学习,传统学习,高阶思维技能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
USING PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT TO ENHANCE STUDENTS' SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS IN STEM LEARNING ACTIVITIES EFFECT OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL PECAN SHELL (Aleurites moluccanus L. Willd) WITH VARIATIONS IN SULFURIC ACID CONCENTRATION ON DECREASED COD AND BOD LEVELS OF LAUNDRY LIQUID WASTE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTIVE CONTENT IN WEBSITE LEARNING MEDIA TO ADDRESS STUDENT MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT APPLICATION OF THE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION MODEL OF LEARNING IN INCREASING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' LEARNING MOTIVATION DEVELOPMENT OF A PROBLEM BASED LEARNING ORIENTED PHYSICS E-MODULE TO IMPROVE THE SCIENTIFIC LITERACY OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1