Sustainable livelihood security in Odisha, India: A district level analysis

Q1 Social Sciences Regional Sustainability Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.regsus.2022.07.003
Braja Sundar Pani, Diptimayee Mishra
{"title":"Sustainable livelihood security in Odisha, India: A district level analysis","authors":"Braja Sundar Pani,&nbsp;Diptimayee Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.regsus.2022.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable livelihood security (SLS) is an integrating framework that encompasses current concerns and policy requirements for ecological, social, and economic dimensions of sustainable development. It carries particular importance for developing economies. This study intends to verify the relative status of SLS of the 30 districts in Odisha, which is a backward state in eastern India. In this study, a total of 22 relevant indicators relating to the three components of SLS—ecological security, social equity, and economic efficiency have been taken, based on various kinds of government reports. The principal component analysis (PCA) has been used to ascertain the indicators and the importance of each of them to the corresponding component of SLS. The ecological security index (ESI), social equity index (SEI), economic efficiency index (EEI), and composite sustainable livelihood security index (CSLSI) of each district of Odisha were calculated through the min-max normalization technique. The results revealed that there are wide variations in SLS among the districts of Odisha. In this study, the districts are categorized into four levels based on scores of ESI, SEI, EEI, and CSLSI as very low (&lt;0.400), low (0.400–0.549), medium (0.550–0.700), and high (&gt;0.700). According to the classification result of CSLSI, 2 districts are found to be in the very low category, 20 districts are under the low sustainability category, 8 districts are in the medium category, and none of the districts are found to be in the high sustainability category. The district of Sambalpur ranks the highest with a CSLSI score of 0.624. The bottom five districts are Gajapati, Bolangir, Nabarangpur, Kandhamal, and Malkangiri, having the CSLSI scores of 0.438, 0.435, 0.406, 0.391, and 0.344, respectively. The result of this study suggests that region-specific, systematic, and proactive approaches are desirable for balanced development in Odisha. Further, policy intervention is required to implement more inclusive tribal welfare policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34395,"journal":{"name":"Regional Sustainability","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 110-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666660X22000330/pdfft?md5=26e78b77d89f92789e941d1abc76e1be&pid=1-s2.0-S2666660X22000330-main.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666660X22000330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Sustainable livelihood security (SLS) is an integrating framework that encompasses current concerns and policy requirements for ecological, social, and economic dimensions of sustainable development. It carries particular importance for developing economies. This study intends to verify the relative status of SLS of the 30 districts in Odisha, which is a backward state in eastern India. In this study, a total of 22 relevant indicators relating to the three components of SLS—ecological security, social equity, and economic efficiency have been taken, based on various kinds of government reports. The principal component analysis (PCA) has been used to ascertain the indicators and the importance of each of them to the corresponding component of SLS. The ecological security index (ESI), social equity index (SEI), economic efficiency index (EEI), and composite sustainable livelihood security index (CSLSI) of each district of Odisha were calculated through the min-max normalization technique. The results revealed that there are wide variations in SLS among the districts of Odisha. In this study, the districts are categorized into four levels based on scores of ESI, SEI, EEI, and CSLSI as very low (<0.400), low (0.400–0.549), medium (0.550–0.700), and high (>0.700). According to the classification result of CSLSI, 2 districts are found to be in the very low category, 20 districts are under the low sustainability category, 8 districts are in the medium category, and none of the districts are found to be in the high sustainability category. The district of Sambalpur ranks the highest with a CSLSI score of 0.624. The bottom five districts are Gajapati, Bolangir, Nabarangpur, Kandhamal, and Malkangiri, having the CSLSI scores of 0.438, 0.435, 0.406, 0.391, and 0.344, respectively. The result of this study suggests that region-specific, systematic, and proactive approaches are desirable for balanced development in Odisha. Further, policy intervention is required to implement more inclusive tribal welfare policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度奥里萨邦可持续生计安全:地区层面分析
可持续生计安全(SLS)是一个综合框架,涵盖了可持续发展的生态、社会和经济层面的当前关切和政策要求。它对发展中经济体尤其重要。本研究旨在验证印度东部落后的奥里萨邦30个地区的SLS相对状况。本研究基于各类政府报告,选取了生态安全、社会公平和经济效率这三个构成要素的22个相关指标。采用主成分分析(PCA)确定了各指标对SLS相应成分的重要性。采用最小-最大归一化方法计算了奥里萨邦各区的生态安全指数(ESI)、社会公平指数(SEI)、经济效率指数(EEI)和综合可持续生计安全指数(CSLSI)。结果显示,奥里萨邦各区的SLS差异很大。在本研究中,根据ESI、SEI、EEI和CSLSI的得分,将各地区分为极低(<0.400)、低(0.400 - 0.549)、中(0.550-0.700)和高(>0.700)四个等级。根据CSLSI的分类结果,有2个地区处于极低可持续性类别,20个地区处于低可持续性类别,8个地区处于中等可持续性类别,没有一个地区处于高可持续性类别。Sambalpur地区的CSLSI得分最高,为0.624。排名最后的5个地区分别是加贾巴蒂、博兰吉尔、纳巴朗布尔、坎达马和马尔坎吉里,CSLSI得分分别为0.438、0.435、0.406、0.391和0.344。这项研究的结果表明,奥里萨邦的平衡发展需要有区域特色的、系统的和积极主动的方法。此外,需要政策干预来实施更具包容性的部落福利政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Regional Sustainability
Regional Sustainability Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Employment and development levels in rural areas of the Russian Federation Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of urban resilience in the Yellow River Basin, China Climatic and non-climatic factors driving the livelihood vulnerability of smallholder farmers in Ahafo Ano North District, Ghana Green transformation paths of resource-based cities in China from the configuration perspective Climate change vulnerability assessment in the new urban planning process in Tanzania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1