Nomos and Platonism in More's Utopia

IF 0.1 N/A MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES MOREANA Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.3366/more.2021.0102
J. Avery
{"title":"Nomos and Platonism in More's Utopia","authors":"J. Avery","doi":"10.3366/more.2021.0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay, following an existing train of scholarship working to make sense of the Platonic connection to Utopia, argues for nomos as a useful angle in furthering this understanding. Raphael's approach to politics combines with the Utopian social system to suggest a highly Platonic vision of nomos, whereby social norms are absorbed into an essentialized nature, stripped of all arbitrariness and therefore, ostensibly, perfectly rational. The result is a sterile regime that fails to acknowledge the whimsical elements necessary to the human soul and therefore also necessary to actual human societies.","PeriodicalId":41939,"journal":{"name":"MOREANA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOREANA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/more.2021.0102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay, following an existing train of scholarship working to make sense of the Platonic connection to Utopia, argues for nomos as a useful angle in furthering this understanding. Raphael's approach to politics combines with the Utopian social system to suggest a highly Platonic vision of nomos, whereby social norms are absorbed into an essentialized nature, stripped of all arbitrariness and therefore, ostensibly, perfectly rational. The result is a sterile regime that fails to acknowledge the whimsical elements necessary to the human soul and therefore also necessary to actual human societies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莫尔《乌托邦》中的诺莫斯与柏拉图主义
这篇文章遵循了现有的学术路线,致力于理解柏拉图主义与乌托邦的联系,认为诺模主义是加深这种理解的一个有用角度。拉斐尔的政治方法与乌托邦式的社会制度相结合,提出了一种高度柏拉图式的法治观,即社会规范被吸收为一种本质化的性质,被剥夺了所有的任意性,因此表面上是完全理性的。其结果是,一个贫瘠的政权没有承认人类灵魂所必需的异想天开的元素,因此对实际的人类社会也是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MOREANA
MOREANA MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
A brief discussion of the differences in the four inscriptions of More’s Utopia G. W. Bernard, Who Ruled Tudor England: An Essay in the Paradoxes of PowerLucy Wooding, Tudor England: A History The Milk Street mystery: Thomas More’s birthplace Lyric, lovers, and limitlessness: Shakespeare’s quarrel with time in Sonnet 55 The politics of Thomas More's A Dialogue of Comfort against Tribulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1