{"title":"Caring for Balance? Legal Approaches to Those Who Struggle to Juggle Work and Adult Care","authors":"Christina Hiessl","doi":"10.54648/ijcl2020006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The provision of informal (family) care is one of the key work–life balance (WLB) issues to be addressed by social policies. So far, both legislative approaches and legal research have focused mainly on childcare-related issues. This is particularly true for the labour law component of policy measures. Considering current demographic trends, it seems crucial to enhance attention on care for older persons and people with disabilities. This article identifies four basic aims of WLB-enhancing social policies – availability, affordability, discouraging ‘too much’ informal care provision, and countering gender inequality – and explores the strategies developed in different legal systems and at the international level to address them. It then examines the degree to which such strategies exist also for adult care, the extent to which ‘transfers’ of childcare-related approaches are conceivable, and the particularities of adult care that call for new approaches to pursue the same aims. It concludes with a discussion of the most important elements of social policy and labour law approaches to promoting the WLB of workers providing informal care for adults.\nWork–Life Balance, Family Care, Informal Care, Care Leave, Comparative Law, International Law, Gender Equality, Labour Law, Social Security, Flexible Working Conditions.","PeriodicalId":44213,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2020006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The provision of informal (family) care is one of the key work–life balance (WLB) issues to be addressed by social policies. So far, both legislative approaches and legal research have focused mainly on childcare-related issues. This is particularly true for the labour law component of policy measures. Considering current demographic trends, it seems crucial to enhance attention on care for older persons and people with disabilities. This article identifies four basic aims of WLB-enhancing social policies – availability, affordability, discouraging ‘too much’ informal care provision, and countering gender inequality – and explores the strategies developed in different legal systems and at the international level to address them. It then examines the degree to which such strategies exist also for adult care, the extent to which ‘transfers’ of childcare-related approaches are conceivable, and the particularities of adult care that call for new approaches to pursue the same aims. It concludes with a discussion of the most important elements of social policy and labour law approaches to promoting the WLB of workers providing informal care for adults.
Work–Life Balance, Family Care, Informal Care, Care Leave, Comparative Law, International Law, Gender Equality, Labour Law, Social Security, Flexible Working Conditions.
期刊介绍:
Published four times a year, the International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations is an essential source of information and analysis for labour lawyers, academics, judges, policymakers and others. The Journal publishes original articles in the domains of labour law (broadly understood) and industrial relations. Articles cover comparative and international (or regional) analysis of topical issues, major developments and innovative practices, as well as discussions of theoretical and methodological approaches. The Journal adopts a double-blind peer review process. A distinguished editorial team, with the support of an International Advisory Board of eminent scholars from around the world, ensures a continuing high standard of scientific research dealing with a range of important issues.