Estranging Adorno: The Dialectics of Alienation in Leonard Michaels's "I Would Have Saved Them If I Could"

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN Studies in American Jewish Literature Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.5325/studamerijewilite.42.1.0001
William Coker
{"title":"Estranging Adorno: The Dialectics of Alienation in Leonard Michaels's \"I Would Have Saved Them If I Could\"","authors":"William Coker","doi":"10.5325/studamerijewilite.42.1.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Reflecting on his relatives' deaths in the Shoah, Leonard Michaels lets their story unfold through a meditation on how not to tell it. He resists both the consolatory aestheticism he finds in Jorge Luis Borges and the teleological closure of Hegelian-Marxist history. Both modes press something positive out of Auschwitz's absolute negativity. Yet Michaels finds he cannot do without Borges and Marx. As his standpoint emerges from theirs, light falls on what both tacitly teach: the necessity of alienation. Enabling a new reading of this key Marxian term, Michaels's story complements and challenges the revisionary Marxism of Theodor W. Adorno. Adorno's late works convey the awareness that a certain alienation inheres in subjectivity and that emancipation requires us to accept our own self-estrangement. In Michaels's story, Borges and Marx appear as figures for the \"nonidentity,\" the internal contradiction, that every self must own in order to achieve an identity. By foregrounding the mismatch between narrative forms and their content, Michaels affirms narrative itself as \"nonidentical.\" Only through the alienation implicit to literature as self-conscious artifice, he finds, can one hope to grasp an experience in either its singularity or its universality.","PeriodicalId":41533,"journal":{"name":"Studies in American Jewish Literature","volume":"42 1","pages":"1 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in American Jewish Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/studamerijewilite.42.1.0001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Reflecting on his relatives' deaths in the Shoah, Leonard Michaels lets their story unfold through a meditation on how not to tell it. He resists both the consolatory aestheticism he finds in Jorge Luis Borges and the teleological closure of Hegelian-Marxist history. Both modes press something positive out of Auschwitz's absolute negativity. Yet Michaels finds he cannot do without Borges and Marx. As his standpoint emerges from theirs, light falls on what both tacitly teach: the necessity of alienation. Enabling a new reading of this key Marxian term, Michaels's story complements and challenges the revisionary Marxism of Theodor W. Adorno. Adorno's late works convey the awareness that a certain alienation inheres in subjectivity and that emancipation requires us to accept our own self-estrangement. In Michaels's story, Borges and Marx appear as figures for the "nonidentity," the internal contradiction, that every self must own in order to achieve an identity. By foregrounding the mismatch between narrative forms and their content, Michaels affirms narrative itself as "nonidentical." Only through the alienation implicit to literature as self-conscious artifice, he finds, can one hope to grasp an experience in either its singularity or its universality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
游离的阿多诺:伦纳德·迈克尔斯《如果可以的话我会拯救他们》中的异化辩证法
伦纳德·迈克尔斯反思他的亲人在大屠杀中的死亡,让他们的故事通过对如何不讲述的思考展开。他既反对博尔赫斯的安慰性唯美主义,也反对黑格尔-马克思主义历史的目的论终结。这两种模式都从奥斯维辛的绝对消极中挖掘出积极的东西。然而迈克尔斯发现他不能没有博尔赫斯和马克思。当他的观点从他们的观点中浮现出来时,光芒落在了两人都心照不宣的教导上:异化的必要性。迈克尔斯的故事补充并挑战了西奥多·阿多诺的修正马克思主义,对这个马克思主义的关键术语进行了新的解读。阿多诺的晚期作品传达了一种意识,即某种异化存在于主体性之中,而解放要求我们接受自我的异化。在迈克尔斯的故事中,博尔赫斯和马克思以“非同一性”的形象出现,这是一种内在的矛盾,每个自我都必须拥有这种矛盾才能获得身份。通过强调叙事形式与其内容之间的不匹配,迈克尔斯肯定了叙事本身是“不相同的”。他发现,只有通过文学作为一种自我意识的技巧所隐含的异化,人们才能希望把握一种经验,无论是它的独特性还是普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Pre/Occupied Longing: Toward a Definition of Postnostalgia in Jonathan Safran Foer's Everything Is Illuminated Yekl to Jake: Reading Cahan with Arendt "Love, Alex": Queering Jonathan Safran Foer's Everything Is Illuminated Estranging Adorno: The Dialectics of Alienation in Leonard Michaels's "I Would Have Saved Them If I Could" Either War Is Finished or We Are: Why Herman Wouk's Duology Deserves a Second Look
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1