Jacques Derrida’s philosophy of forgiveness

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Filosofia Unisinos Pub Date : 2021-08-02 DOI:10.4013/fsu.2021.222.01
S. Ivic
{"title":"Jacques Derrida’s philosophy of forgiveness","authors":"S. Ivic","doi":"10.4013/fsu.2021.222.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nThis paper presents social and political dimensions of forgiveness within Jacques Derrida’s philosophy. Derrida’s philosophy of forgiveness is an example of how philosophy can help us understand and resolve contemporary social and political issues. Derrida believes that traditional concept of forgiveness should be broadened beyond the bounds of the rational and the imaginable. According to Derrida, traditional concept of forgiveness needs rethinking because of the phenomenon of proliferation of scenes of forgiveness after the Second World War that produced globalization of forgiveness and trivialized and decharacterized this term. According to Derrida, the act of forgiveness can only be thought beyond the limits of common sense and in the space of the impossible, and that is the forgiveness of something that common sense cannot forgive. Derrida’s philosophy of forgiveness has wide social and political implications as it transcends binary oppositions: present/past, self/other, friend/enemy and so forth. All concepts within Derrida’s philosophy of politics (friendship, enemy, hospitality, forgiveness, justice, and so on) are significant for societies eroded with traumas of wars and ethno-national divisions and conflicts.\nKeywords: Derrida, philosophy, forgiveness, enemy, migration, asylum, hospitality.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":41989,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia Unisinos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia Unisinos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2021.222.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper presents social and political dimensions of forgiveness within Jacques Derrida’s philosophy. Derrida’s philosophy of forgiveness is an example of how philosophy can help us understand and resolve contemporary social and political issues. Derrida believes that traditional concept of forgiveness should be broadened beyond the bounds of the rational and the imaginable. According to Derrida, traditional concept of forgiveness needs rethinking because of the phenomenon of proliferation of scenes of forgiveness after the Second World War that produced globalization of forgiveness and trivialized and decharacterized this term. According to Derrida, the act of forgiveness can only be thought beyond the limits of common sense and in the space of the impossible, and that is the forgiveness of something that common sense cannot forgive. Derrida’s philosophy of forgiveness has wide social and political implications as it transcends binary oppositions: present/past, self/other, friend/enemy and so forth. All concepts within Derrida’s philosophy of politics (friendship, enemy, hospitality, forgiveness, justice, and so on) are significant for societies eroded with traumas of wars and ethno-national divisions and conflicts. Keywords: Derrida, philosophy, forgiveness, enemy, migration, asylum, hospitality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雅克·德里达的宽恕哲学
本文介绍了德里达哲学中宽恕的社会和政治层面。德里达的宽恕哲学是哲学如何帮助我们理解和解决当代社会和政治问题的一个例子。德里达认为,传统的宽恕概念应该超越理性和想象的界限。德里达认为,传统的宽恕概念需要重新思考,因为第二次世界大战后宽恕场景的激增现象产生了宽恕的全球化,并淡化和淡化了这个术语。根据德里达的说法,宽恕行为只能超越常识的限制,在不可能的空间中思考,这就是对常识无法原谅的事情的宽恕。德里达的宽恕哲学具有广泛的社会和政治意义,因为它超越了二元对立:现在/过去、自我/他人、朋友/敌人等等。德里达政治哲学中的所有概念(友谊、敌人、热情好客、宽恕、正义等)对饱受战争创伤、民族分裂和冲突的社会都具有重要意义。关键词:德里达,哲学,宽恕,敌人,移民,庇护,好客。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Filosofia Unisinos
Filosofia Unisinos PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
O republicanismo neorromano na concepção de liberdade de J. S. Mill Preceitos e consequências da unificação de lógica e metafísica por Hegel: A desobediência civil como um direito de defesa em Rawls e uma tentativa de resposta à crítica de Raz Verdade e Justiça em Emmanuel Levinas Uma avaliação crítica da implausibilidade teórica do socioconstrutivismo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1