We can still feel good: evaluation of the I can feel good programme second edition in a low secure unit

S. Ashworth, C. Robinson, Donna Harrison, Natalie Brotherton
{"title":"We can still feel good: evaluation of the I can feel good programme second edition in a low secure unit","authors":"S. Ashworth, C. Robinson, Donna Harrison, Natalie Brotherton","doi":"10.1108/AMHID-08-2020-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to present the process of reviewing, adapting and evaluating, the second edition of the I Can Feel Good programme (Ashworth et al., 2018) and adapted DBT programme facilitated at a low-security psychiatric hospital for men with intellectual disability. Through the presentation of programme development, evaluation and revision, a more thorough and transparent understanding of the process involved can be disseminated.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe programme lasted approximately 14 months and covered all four modules. N = 5, all-male, ages ranged between 23 and 57 years old. All detained under the MHA (1983) with a primary diagnosis of Mild ID with comorbid psychiatric diagnoses including mental illness, autism spectrum disorders and personality disorder. To evaluate routine effectiveness a pre-post comparison within groups design was used. A standardised GAS approach provided a template to score the degree to which identified goals were achieved over the intervention for participants.\n\n\nFindings\nWilcoxon signed-rank tests were used due to data not meeting parametric assumptions regarding normal distribution. Except for the mindfulness module, all modules saw pre to post programme psychometric results in the desired direction, evidencing skills acquisition. Coping in crisis and managing feelings modules outcomes neared statistical significance, with the module of people skills demonstrating statistical significance (p < 0.05).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nUpon examination of the results, it appears as though the second edition pilot programme, displayed initially promising results. The clinical and statistical aspects of the programme are explored, in the hope that clinicians may consider the programme’s application and utility within various clinical contexts, in addition to gaining insight into the process of programme development and refinement.\n","PeriodicalId":44693,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AMHID-08-2020-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to present the process of reviewing, adapting and evaluating, the second edition of the I Can Feel Good programme (Ashworth et al., 2018) and adapted DBT programme facilitated at a low-security psychiatric hospital for men with intellectual disability. Through the presentation of programme development, evaluation and revision, a more thorough and transparent understanding of the process involved can be disseminated. Design/methodology/approach The programme lasted approximately 14 months and covered all four modules. N = 5, all-male, ages ranged between 23 and 57 years old. All detained under the MHA (1983) with a primary diagnosis of Mild ID with comorbid psychiatric diagnoses including mental illness, autism spectrum disorders and personality disorder. To evaluate routine effectiveness a pre-post comparison within groups design was used. A standardised GAS approach provided a template to score the degree to which identified goals were achieved over the intervention for participants. Findings Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used due to data not meeting parametric assumptions regarding normal distribution. Except for the mindfulness module, all modules saw pre to post programme psychometric results in the desired direction, evidencing skills acquisition. Coping in crisis and managing feelings modules outcomes neared statistical significance, with the module of people skills demonstrating statistical significance (p < 0.05). Originality/value Upon examination of the results, it appears as though the second edition pilot programme, displayed initially promising results. The clinical and statistical aspects of the programme are explored, in the hope that clinicians may consider the programme’s application and utility within various clinical contexts, in addition to gaining insight into the process of programme development and refinement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们仍然可以感觉良好:评估我可以感觉良好的程序第二版在一个低安全单元
本文旨在介绍审查、调整和评估第二版“我能感觉良好”计划(Ashworth等人,2018)的过程,以及在一家低安全性精神病院为智障男性提供的改编DBT计划。通过介绍方案发展、评价和修订,可以传播对所涉进程的更彻底和透明的了解。设计/方法/方法该课程持续了大约14个月,涵盖了所有四个模块。N = 5,均为男性,年龄在23 - 57岁之间。所有在1983年根据《精神卫生条例》羁留的人士,初步诊断为轻度精神障碍,并伴有精神疾病、自闭症谱系障碍及人格障碍等精神病共病。为了评估常规有效性,采用组内前后比较设计。标准化的GAS方法提供了一个模板,用于对参与者在干预过程中实现确定目标的程度进行评分。由于数据不符合关于正态分布的参数假设,因此使用了wilcoxon符号秩检验。除了正念模块外,所有模块都看到了计划前到计划后的心理测量结果,表明技能习得。危机应对和情绪管理模块结果接近统计学意义,人际交往能力模块结果具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。原创性/价值在审查结果后,似乎第二版试点方案最初显示了有希望的结果。该计划的临床和统计方面进行了探索,希望临床医生可以考虑该计划在各种临床环境中的应用和效用,除了深入了解计划发展和完善的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Gabapentin treatment for challenging behaviors in autism spectrum disorder and coexisting intellectual disability: a case report The effectiveness of family-based treatment and pharmacotherapy in an adolescent with anorexia nervosa and intellectual disability: a case report Health literacy in parents of children with Down syndrome STOMP during COVID-19: use of psychotropic medication in intellectual disabilities community services – pilot QI project Co-design and pilot of a virtual reality intervention to improve mental and physical healthcare accessibility for people with intellectual disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1