The Promise of Assessments That Advance Social Justice: An Indigenous Example

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Applied Measurement in Education Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI:10.1080/08957347.2023.2222031
Pōhai Kūkea Shultz, Kerry S. Englert
{"title":"The Promise of Assessments That Advance Social Justice: An Indigenous Example","authors":"Pōhai Kūkea Shultz, Kerry S. Englert","doi":"10.1080/08957347.2023.2222031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the United States, systemic racism against people of color was brought to the forefront of discourse throughout 2020, and highlighted the on-going inequities faced by intentionally marginalized groups in policing, health and education. No community of color is immune from these inequities, and the activism in 2020 and the consequences of the pandemic have made systemic inequities impossible to ignore. In the Hawaiʻi context, social and racial injustice has resulted in cultural and language loss (among other markers of colonization), but it is within this loss that we can see the potential for the most significant evolution of assessment practices that champion self determination and social justice. We illustrate how injustices can be addressed through the development of assessments centered in advocacy of and accountability to our communities of color. It is time for us to reimagine what self-determination and social justice in all assessment systems can and should look like.","PeriodicalId":51609,"journal":{"name":"Applied Measurement in Education","volume":"36 1","pages":"255 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Measurement in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2023.2222031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the United States, systemic racism against people of color was brought to the forefront of discourse throughout 2020, and highlighted the on-going inequities faced by intentionally marginalized groups in policing, health and education. No community of color is immune from these inequities, and the activism in 2020 and the consequences of the pandemic have made systemic inequities impossible to ignore. In the Hawaiʻi context, social and racial injustice has resulted in cultural and language loss (among other markers of colonization), but it is within this loss that we can see the potential for the most significant evolution of assessment practices that champion self determination and social justice. We illustrate how injustices can be addressed through the development of assessments centered in advocacy of and accountability to our communities of color. It is time for us to reimagine what self-determination and social justice in all assessment systems can and should look like.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进社会公正的评估承诺:一个土著人的例子
摘要在美国,2020年,针对有色人种的系统性种族主义被提上了讨论的焦点,并突显了故意边缘化群体在警务、卫生和教育方面面临的持续不平等。没有一个有色人种社区能够免受这些不平等的影响,2020年的激进主义和疫情的后果使系统性的不平等现象不容忽视。在夏威夷的背景下,社会和种族不公正导致了文化和语言的丧失(以及其他殖民化标志),但正是在这种丧失中,我们可以看到支持自决和社会正义的评估实践有可能发生最重大的演变。我们展示了如何通过制定以倡导和问责有色人种社区为中心的评估来解决不公正现象。现在是我们重新想象所有评估系统中的自决和社会正义可以而且应该是什么样子的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Because interaction between the domains of research and application is critical to the evaluation and improvement of new educational measurement practices, Applied Measurement in Education" prime objective is to improve communication between academicians and practitioners. To help bridge the gap between theory and practice, articles in this journal describe original research studies, innovative strategies for solving educational measurement problems, and integrative reviews of current approaches to contemporary measurement issues. Peer Review Policy: All review papers in this journal have undergone editorial screening and peer review.
期刊最新文献
New Tests of Rater Drift in Trend Scoring Automated Scoring of Short-Answer Questions: A Progress Report Item and Test Characteristic Curves of Rank-2PL Models for Multidimensional Forced-Choice Questionnaires Impact of violating unidimensionality on Rasch calibration for mixed-format tests Can Adaptive Testing Improve Test-Taking Experience? A Case Study on Educational Survey Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1