Manwoman and the Neuterity of Being in Greek Statuary

Q3 Arts and Humanities Studia Heideggeriana Pub Date : 2023-03-13 DOI:10.46605/sh.vol12.2023.199
Michael Arvanitopoulos
{"title":"Manwoman and the Neuterity of Being in Greek Statuary","authors":"Michael Arvanitopoulos","doi":"10.46605/sh.vol12.2023.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A combination of uncritical interpretations of Greek art maintained since antiquity, together with Heidegger’s failed attempt to connect Being with Dasein through the Greeks, has misled the feminist agenda into dismissing both Heidegger and the Greeks. The bad blood left by Irigaray has revitalized scholarship which wants to know why the world-disclosive nullity of Being cannot be primordially transgenderous in essence prior to its worldly dispersal into the two sexes. It takes a radical, phenomenological reduction which applies suprasegmental theory to re-chisel and strip the Greek statue from multiple layers of calcified presumptions deposited by millennia of realism, historicism, naturalism, and psychologism, until the inherently absent primordiality which Heidegger searched in vain in order to ground Dasein, the same which feminism would dismiss as phallocracy if it was not transgender, becomes literally visible. Two fifth century monumental works, the female Euthydikos Kore and the male Blonde Youth, are re-discovered in the reduction, and the prosody that is their faces lets the two genders reunite into something like a dark song.","PeriodicalId":33973,"journal":{"name":"Studia Heideggeriana","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Heideggeriana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46605/sh.vol12.2023.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A combination of uncritical interpretations of Greek art maintained since antiquity, together with Heidegger’s failed attempt to connect Being with Dasein through the Greeks, has misled the feminist agenda into dismissing both Heidegger and the Greeks. The bad blood left by Irigaray has revitalized scholarship which wants to know why the world-disclosive nullity of Being cannot be primordially transgenderous in essence prior to its worldly dispersal into the two sexes. It takes a radical, phenomenological reduction which applies suprasegmental theory to re-chisel and strip the Greek statue from multiple layers of calcified presumptions deposited by millennia of realism, historicism, naturalism, and psychologism, until the inherently absent primordiality which Heidegger searched in vain in order to ground Dasein, the same which feminism would dismiss as phallocracy if it was not transgender, becomes literally visible. Two fifth century monumental works, the female Euthydikos Kore and the male Blonde Youth, are re-discovered in the reduction, and the prosody that is their faces lets the two genders reunite into something like a dark song.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
希腊雕像中的男性女性与存在的中性
自古以来对希腊艺术的不加批判的解释,加上海德格尔试图通过希腊人将存在与此在联系起来的失败尝试,误导了女权主义议程,使其忽视海德格尔和希腊人。Irigaray留下的恶血使学者们重新焕发了活力,他们想知道为什么存在的世界揭露性的虚无在它在世界上分散为两性之前,在本质上不能是原始的跨性别的。它需要一种激进的、现象学的还原,运用超片段理论,从数千年来现实主义、历史主义、自然主义和心理主义沉淀的多层钙化的假设中重新挖掘和剥离希腊雕像,直到海德格尔为了扎根于此在而徒劳地寻找的内在缺失的原始性,同样的,如果不是变性的话,女权主义会将其视为男性统治而予以摒弃,变得实实在在地可见。两幅五世纪的不朽作品,女性的《Euthydikos Kore》和男性的《Blonde Youth》,在还原中被重新发现,她们脸上的韵律让两种性别重新结合成一首黑暗的歌曲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Heideggeriana
Studia Heideggeriana Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Temporalidad, mundo y praxis. La influencia de la obra temprana de Heidegger en la teoría política arendtiana El estilo del Da-sein Falsa concreción, praxis y habitar. Posibles respuestas de Heidegger al joven Marcuse Teoría y praxis en el pensamiento de Heidegger Pertenencia “específica” y modificabilidad de las maneras del ser
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1