Social Classes of Intelligence, Economic Growth and Technological Achievement: Robust Regression and Outlier Detection

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics Pub Date : 2018-03-29 DOI:10.1177/0260107918761923
Nik Ahmad Sufian Burhan, R. C. Razak, S. Ibrahim, M. R. Selamat, Muhamad Ridhwan Rosli
{"title":"Social Classes of Intelligence, Economic Growth and Technological Achievement: Robust Regression and Outlier Detection","authors":"Nik Ahmad Sufian Burhan, R. C. Razak, S. Ibrahim, M. R. Selamat, Muhamad Ridhwan Rosli","doi":"10.1177/0260107918761923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A previous study has shown that the intellectual class, which is represented by the 95th percentile intelligence quotient (IQ) at a normal distribution, displayed the strongest impact upon economic growth. Meanwhile, those with average ability (50th percentile IQ) exhibited the second strongest impact, and followed by the non-intellectual class (5th percentile IQ). In addition, the researchers discovered that only the intellectual class was significant for technological progress. As such, this article re-analysed the dataset employed in prior study via robust regression. As a result, after eliminating several outliers, the levels of IQ for the intellectual class and the average ability group displayed equal impacts on economic growth, and the impacts were larger than that of non-intellectual. Furthermore, the IQ of the average ability group was significant for technological achievement, although not as strong as the intellectual class. Besides, the number of professional researchers employed in the research and development (R&D) sector did not reflect similar paramount effects as the impact of the average ability IQ in generating technological development. Thus, based on the conclusions drawn, this study suggests that the R&D sector should employ professionals who possess not only high academic qualifications, but also exceptional levels of cognitive skills, especially to spark new innovations. JEL: J24, O31, O47, Z13","PeriodicalId":42664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0260107918761923","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0260107918761923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A previous study has shown that the intellectual class, which is represented by the 95th percentile intelligence quotient (IQ) at a normal distribution, displayed the strongest impact upon economic growth. Meanwhile, those with average ability (50th percentile IQ) exhibited the second strongest impact, and followed by the non-intellectual class (5th percentile IQ). In addition, the researchers discovered that only the intellectual class was significant for technological progress. As such, this article re-analysed the dataset employed in prior study via robust regression. As a result, after eliminating several outliers, the levels of IQ for the intellectual class and the average ability group displayed equal impacts on economic growth, and the impacts were larger than that of non-intellectual. Furthermore, the IQ of the average ability group was significant for technological achievement, although not as strong as the intellectual class. Besides, the number of professional researchers employed in the research and development (R&D) sector did not reflect similar paramount effects as the impact of the average ability IQ in generating technological development. Thus, based on the conclusions drawn, this study suggests that the R&D sector should employ professionals who possess not only high academic qualifications, but also exceptional levels of cognitive skills, especially to spark new innovations. JEL: J24, O31, O47, Z13
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智力社会阶层、经济增长和技术成就:稳健回归和异常值检测
此前有研究表明,以正态分布的第95百分位智商(IQ)为代表的智力阶层对经济增长的影响最大。与此同时,具有中等能力的人(智商第50百分位)表现出第二强烈的影响,其次是非智力阶层(智商第5百分位)。此外,研究人员还发现,只有知识分子阶层对技术进步有重要影响。因此,本文通过稳健回归重新分析了先前研究中使用的数据集。结果表明,在剔除几个异常值后,智力阶层和平均能力群体的智商水平对经济增长的影响是相等的,且其影响大于非智力阶层。此外,平均能力组的智商对技术成就有显著影响,尽管不如智力阶层那么强。此外,在研发(R&D)部门雇用的专业研究人员的数量并没有反映出与平均能力智商在产生技术发展方面的影响相似的最重要影响。因此,基于得出的结论,本研究建议研发部门不仅应该雇用具有高学历的专业人员,还应该雇用具有特殊水平的认知技能的专业人员,特别是要激发新的创新。耶利记:j24, o31, o47, z13
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The explosion of information and research that has taken place in recent years has had a profound effect upon a variety of existing academic disciplines giving rise to the dissolution of barriers between some, mergers between others, and the creation of entirely new fields of enquiry.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Evolution Analysis of Cryptocurrency Market: A Network Science Study Green Transitions in Developing Countries: Perspectives on Women’s Political Leadership Can Cryptocurrencies Provide Better Diversification Benefits? Evidence from the Indian Stock Market A Bibliographic Review of Illusion of Knowledge in the Financial Field Assessment and Forecasting of the Military, Economic and Demographic Impact of the Russian–Ukrainian War on the National Economy of Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1