EVALUACIÓN DE LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE ECO-INNOVACIONES EN SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN DE LECHE EN PEQUEÑA ESCALA

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems Pub Date : 2023-08-08 DOI:10.56369/tsaes.4873
Itzel Cortés-Fernández, C. Arriaga-Jordán, H. Thomé-Ortíz, C. Martínez-García
{"title":"EVALUACIÓN DE LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE ECO-INNOVACIONES EN SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN DE LECHE EN PEQUEÑA ESCALA","authors":"Itzel Cortés-Fernández, C. Arriaga-Jordán, H. Thomé-Ortíz, C. Martínez-García","doi":"10.56369/tsaes.4873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Eco-innovation (EI) involves new goods and services that reduce negative environmental impacts. In small-scale dairy systems (SCDS) the adoption of innovations is low, this has been associated with the lack of extension services, so its evaluation is needed to improve the services. Objective. To identify and to evaluate the implementation process of four EI in SCDS. Methodology. The research was conducted in the Municipality of Aculco, State of Mexico. Twenty-one small-scale dairy farmers with a maximum herd size of 35 cows were selected. A questionnaire was applied to collect information about the concept of EI, time of use, diffusion and acquisition, changes for implementation, limitations and motivations, disuse and suggestions. The information was analyzed by frequencies and percentages. Four groups were formed according to the type of EI (bio-digester, solar heater, water collection, and solar cells), and the implementation process of each one was described. The evaluation of three technology phases (communication, transfer and adoption) and their stages was proposed using a five-point Likert scale for each EI. Differences between groups were analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis test (P<0.05). Results. None of the farmers knew the term eco-innovation, 67% found out about the EI implemented by acquaintances, 76% required financial support, 86% were motivated by economic savings, and 62% mentioned ignorance as the main limitation. The implementation process was different for all four EI, and there were significant differences in their dissemination, information, accessibility, training, appropriation, and recommendation. Implications. The evaluation proposal to implement EI can be applied to several technologies and contexts because it considers common stages, although each innovation has its own process. Conclusions. It is concluded that the knowledge of the EI implementation process and the perception of it allows to identify improvements for the adoption of useful innovations in the SCDS.","PeriodicalId":23259,"journal":{"name":"Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.4873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Eco-innovation (EI) involves new goods and services that reduce negative environmental impacts. In small-scale dairy systems (SCDS) the adoption of innovations is low, this has been associated with the lack of extension services, so its evaluation is needed to improve the services. Objective. To identify and to evaluate the implementation process of four EI in SCDS. Methodology. The research was conducted in the Municipality of Aculco, State of Mexico. Twenty-one small-scale dairy farmers with a maximum herd size of 35 cows were selected. A questionnaire was applied to collect information about the concept of EI, time of use, diffusion and acquisition, changes for implementation, limitations and motivations, disuse and suggestions. The information was analyzed by frequencies and percentages. Four groups were formed according to the type of EI (bio-digester, solar heater, water collection, and solar cells), and the implementation process of each one was described. The evaluation of three technology phases (communication, transfer and adoption) and their stages was proposed using a five-point Likert scale for each EI. Differences between groups were analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis test (P<0.05). Results. None of the farmers knew the term eco-innovation, 67% found out about the EI implemented by acquaintances, 76% required financial support, 86% were motivated by economic savings, and 62% mentioned ignorance as the main limitation. The implementation process was different for all four EI, and there were significant differences in their dissemination, information, accessibility, training, appropriation, and recommendation. Implications. The evaluation proposal to implement EI can be applied to several technologies and contexts because it considers common stages, although each innovation has its own process. Conclusions. It is concluded that the knowledge of the EI implementation process and the perception of it allows to identify improvements for the adoption of useful innovations in the SCDS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估小规模牛奶生产系统中生态创新的实施情况
背景。生态创新(EI)涉及减少负面环境影响的新产品和服务。在小规模乳制品系统(SCDS)中,创新的采用率较低,这与缺乏推广服务有关,因此需要对其进行评价以改进服务。目标。识别和评估SCDS中四个EI的实施过程。方法。这项研究是在墨西哥阿库尔科市进行的。选择了21个最大畜群规模为35头奶牛的小规模奶农。本研究采用问卷调查的方式收集了情商的概念、使用时间、传播和获取、实施变化、限制和动机、废弃和建议等方面的信息。这些信息通过频率和百分比进行分析。根据EI类型分为四组(生物沼气池、太阳能热水器、集水器和太阳能电池),并对每一组的实施过程进行了描述。对三个技术阶段(传播、转移和采用)及其阶段的评估提出了对每个EI使用五点李克特量表。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析各组间差异(P<0.05)。结果。没有一个农民知道生态创新这个词,67%的农民通过熟人了解到EI的实施,76%的农民需要资金支持,86%的农民出于经济节省的动机,62%的农民认为无知是主要的限制。四种EI的实施过程各不相同,在传播、信息、可及性、培训、拨款和推荐方面存在显著差异。的影响。尽管每个创新都有自己的过程,但实施EI的评估建议可以应用于多种技术和环境,因为它考虑了共同的阶段。结论。结论是,对EI实施过程的了解和对它的感知,有助于确定在SCDS中采用有用创新的改进措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is an international peer-reviewed publication devoted to disseminate original information contributing to the understanding and development of agroecosystems in tropical and subtropical areas. The Journal recognizes the multidisciplinary nature of its scope and encourages the submission of original manuscripts from all of the disciplines involved in this area. Original contributions are welcomed in relation to the study of particular components of the agroecosystems (i.e. plant, animal, soil) as well as the resulting interactions and their relationship/impact on society and environment. The journal does not received manuscripts based solely on economic acpects o food technology.
期刊最新文献
ECOLOGICAL ATTRIBUTES OF WEEDS AS INDICATORS OF SUSTAINABILITY IN AGROECOSYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHEASTERN REGION OF MEXICO CITY EVALUACIÓN DE LAS VARIEDADES DE TRIGO DON LUPE ORO C2020 Y CIANO M2018 DURANTE EL CICLO 2022-2023 EN EL VALLE DE MEXICALI, MÉXICO IDONEIDAD DEL HÁBITAT Y ETAPAS DE DOMESTICACIÓN DE Heliopsis longipes (ASTERACEAE: HELIANTHEAE) RESILIENCE AND LESSONS LEARNED IN COLOMBIAN FAMILY FARMING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC NUTRITIONAL VALUE AND IN VITRO DRY MATTER DEGRADABILITY IN MEXICAN SUNFLOWER: Tithonia diversifolia Helms (Gray)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1