Interevaluator and Intraevaluator Reliability of Chest Wall Mobility Assessment in Young Asthmatics Subjects

A. Garcia-Araujo, R. Trimer, Cássia da Luz Goulart, F. Caruso, P. A. Ricci, A. Borghi-Silva
{"title":"Interevaluator and Intraevaluator Reliability of Chest Wall Mobility Assessment in Young Asthmatics Subjects","authors":"A. Garcia-Araujo, R. Trimer, Cássia da Luz Goulart, F. Caruso, P. A. Ricci, A. Borghi-Silva","doi":"10.1097/CPT.0000000000000190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate interrater and intrarater reliability of chest wall mobility using cirtometry in individuals with asthma and controls. Methods: Twenty-six controlled individuals with asthma group (AG) and 12 healthy individuals control group (CG) underwent chest wall mobility assessed by cirtometry. The measurements were performed manually by 2 independent evaluators at 3 levels: axillary, xiphoid and abdominal using a tape, in 2 different days. For the analyses, the average of 3 measurements and the highest value were considered. Results: Interrater reliability in AG showed acceptable intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the axillary (0.76 and 0.75), good for the xiphoid (0.91 and 0.93), and abdominal level (0.91 and 0.91) for the average and highest value. In CG, ICC values were acceptable for the 3 levels: axillary (0.64 and 0.71), xiphoid (0.66 and 0.93), and abdominal level (0.61 and 0.91) also for the average and highest value. The analysis with the mean and the highest values found it acceptable for the axillary and good for the xiphoid and abdominal levels. Intrarater ICC was good for all levels in AG, axillary (0.86), xiphoid (0.93), and abdominal (0.96), for both evaluators. In CG, for evaluator 1, it was acceptable for the axillary and good for the xiphoid and abdominal levels. Regarding evaluator 2, it was good for the axillary and xiphoid and acceptable at the abdominal level. Conclusion: Cirtometry is a reliable tool to measure the chest wall mobility in controlled asthma individuals and in healthy individuals. The average of the 3 measurements or the highest value of the evaluations may be considered in clinical assessments. Axillary mobility was lower in the asthma group.","PeriodicalId":72526,"journal":{"name":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"70 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CPT.0000000000000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate interrater and intrarater reliability of chest wall mobility using cirtometry in individuals with asthma and controls. Methods: Twenty-six controlled individuals with asthma group (AG) and 12 healthy individuals control group (CG) underwent chest wall mobility assessed by cirtometry. The measurements were performed manually by 2 independent evaluators at 3 levels: axillary, xiphoid and abdominal using a tape, in 2 different days. For the analyses, the average of 3 measurements and the highest value were considered. Results: Interrater reliability in AG showed acceptable intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the axillary (0.76 and 0.75), good for the xiphoid (0.91 and 0.93), and abdominal level (0.91 and 0.91) for the average and highest value. In CG, ICC values were acceptable for the 3 levels: axillary (0.64 and 0.71), xiphoid (0.66 and 0.93), and abdominal level (0.61 and 0.91) also for the average and highest value. The analysis with the mean and the highest values found it acceptable for the axillary and good for the xiphoid and abdominal levels. Intrarater ICC was good for all levels in AG, axillary (0.86), xiphoid (0.93), and abdominal (0.96), for both evaluators. In CG, for evaluator 1, it was acceptable for the axillary and good for the xiphoid and abdominal levels. Regarding evaluator 2, it was good for the axillary and xiphoid and acceptable at the abdominal level. Conclusion: Cirtometry is a reliable tool to measure the chest wall mobility in controlled asthma individuals and in healthy individuals. The average of the 3 measurements or the highest value of the evaluations may be considered in clinical assessments. Axillary mobility was lower in the asthma group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青年哮喘患者胸壁活动度评估的内、间信度
目的:评价哮喘患者和对照组胸壁活动度的内外部可靠性。方法:26例哮喘对照组(AG)和12例健康对照组(CG)分别采用胸壁活度仪评估胸壁活度。测量由2名独立的评估人员手动进行,在3个水平:腋窝,剑突和腹部,使用胶带,在2个不同的天。在分析中,考虑了3次测量的平均值和最高值。结果:AG的组间信度显示,腋窝组的组内相关系数(ICC)可接受(0.76和0.75),剑突组的组内相关系数(ICC)良好(0.91和0.93),腹部组的组内相关系数(ICC)均值和最高值分别为0.91和0.91。在CG中,ICC值在3个水平均可接受:腋窝(0.64和0.71)、剑突(0.66和0.93)和腹部(0.61和0.91)的平均值和最高值。对平均值和最高值的分析发现,它对腋窝水平是可以接受的,对剑突和腹部水平是良好的。对于两种评估者,体内ICC对所有水平的AG,腋窝(0.86),剑突(0.93)和腹部(0.96)都很好。在CG中,对于评估者1来说,腋窝水平是可以接受的剑突和腹部水平也是可以接受的。对于评估器2,它对腋窝和剑突是好的,在腹部是可以接受的。结论:血液循环仪是一种可靠的测量哮喘控制个体和健康人胸壁活动度的工具。在临床评估中可考虑3项测量的平均值或评价的最高值。哮喘组腋窝活动度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associations between Physical Activity, Systemic Inflammation, and Hospital Admissions in Adults with Heart Failure. From the Swimming Pool to Precision Cardiovascular Physical Therapy: What a Journey! Commentary on “Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Outpatients With Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Survey of Orthopedic and Sports Academies” Professional Community Simulation-Based Cardiopulmonary Examination Skills Checklist: Assessment of Inter-rater Reliability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1