Alienated Learning in the Context of Curricular Reforms

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education As Change Pub Date : 2022-05-27 DOI:10.25159/1947-9417/9680
Yi Lian, K. Tsang, J. L. Wong, G. Li
{"title":"Alienated Learning in the Context of Curricular Reforms","authors":"Yi Lian, K. Tsang, J. L. Wong, G. Li","doi":"10.25159/1947-9417/9680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In neoliberal contexts, schools are accountable for educational quality, and effectiveness is measured by objective indicators, such as examination scores. Schools tend to become committed to preparing students for examinations rather than all-round and complete personal development, making it difficult for students to identify the meaningful connections between themselves and learning activities, and, in turn, resulting in negative learning experiences. Marxist theorists refer to this condition as alienated learning, that is, the internal contradiction between the learner’s self and learning labour. In contrast, curricular reforms across the globe have promoted a progressive pedagogy that values engaging students in the full range of life experiences in education, enabling them to overcome alienated learning. Yet the effects of curricular reforms are still unclear. The present study sheds light on the extent to which reforms permit students to confront alienated learning. To achieve this aim, the study investigated 44 Hong Kong secondary and undergraduate students with photovoice methods. Its findings suggest that the effects of these curricular reforms are minimal, though they offer opportunities for students to explore their interests. Many students will still experience alienated learning; their interests continue to be subordinated to examinations and even devalued by their schools and teachers.","PeriodicalId":44983,"journal":{"name":"Education As Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education As Change","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/9680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In neoliberal contexts, schools are accountable for educational quality, and effectiveness is measured by objective indicators, such as examination scores. Schools tend to become committed to preparing students for examinations rather than all-round and complete personal development, making it difficult for students to identify the meaningful connections between themselves and learning activities, and, in turn, resulting in negative learning experiences. Marxist theorists refer to this condition as alienated learning, that is, the internal contradiction between the learner’s self and learning labour. In contrast, curricular reforms across the globe have promoted a progressive pedagogy that values engaging students in the full range of life experiences in education, enabling them to overcome alienated learning. Yet the effects of curricular reforms are still unclear. The present study sheds light on the extent to which reforms permit students to confront alienated learning. To achieve this aim, the study investigated 44 Hong Kong secondary and undergraduate students with photovoice methods. Its findings suggest that the effects of these curricular reforms are minimal, though they offer opportunities for students to explore their interests. Many students will still experience alienated learning; their interests continue to be subordinated to examinations and even devalued by their schools and teachers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
课程改革背景下的异化学习
在新自由主义背景下,学校对教育质量负责,教育效果由客观指标衡量,比如考试分数。学校往往致力于为学生准备考试,而不是全面和完整的个人发展,这使得学生很难确定自己和学习活动之间的有意义的联系,反过来,导致消极的学习经历。马克思主义理论家把这种情况称为异化学习,即学习者自我与学习劳动之间的内在矛盾。相比之下,全球范围内的课程改革推动了一种进步的教学法,这种教学法重视让学生参与教育的全部生活经历,使他们能够克服异化的学习。然而,课程改革的效果仍不明朗。目前的研究揭示了改革在多大程度上允许学生面对异化的学习。为达此目的,本研究以光声法调查了44名香港中学生及本科生。调查结果表明,这些课程改革的效果微乎其微,尽管它们为学生提供了探索自己兴趣的机会。许多学生仍将经历疏离式学习;他们的兴趣继续服从于考试,甚至被学校和老师贬低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education As Change
Education As Change EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Education as Change is an accredited, peer reviewed scholarly online journal that publishes original articles reflecting critically on issues of equality in education and on the ways in which educational practices contribute to transformation in non-formal, formal and informal contexts. Critique, mainly understood in the tradition of critical pedagogies, is a constructive process which contributes towards a better world. Contributions from and about marginalised communities and from different knowledge traditions are encouraged. The articles could draw on any rigorous research methodology, as well as transdisciplinary approaches. Research of a very specialised or technical nature should be framed within relevant discourses. While specialised kinds of research are encouraged, authors are expected to write for a broader audience of educational researchers and practitioners without losing conceptual and theoretical depth and rigour. All sectors of education are covered in the journal. These include primary, secondary and tertiary education, adult education, worker education, educational policy and teacher education.
期刊最新文献
Vocational Education and Graduate Struggles in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: A Freirean Approach Unveiling the Employability Landscape: Chinese International Doctoral Students in Malaysian Universities Bibliometric Coloniality in South Africa: Critical Review of the Indexes of Accredited Journals Educide as Genocide in Palestine “Our Identity is Our Dignity”: Digital Transformations: Palestinian Aspirations, Idealism, Reality and Pragmatism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1