The role of knowledge management in driving academic advancement: empirical examination from the lens of the social cognitive theory

IF 2.7 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems Pub Date : 2023-01-24 DOI:10.1108/vjikms-09-2022-0289
Quang Huan Ngo, Thanh Tiep Le, Huu Phuc Dang, Bang Nguyen-Viet
{"title":"The role of knowledge management in driving academic advancement: empirical examination from the lens of the social cognitive theory","authors":"Quang Huan Ngo, Thanh Tiep Le, Huu Phuc Dang, Bang Nguyen-Viet","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-09-2022-0289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the attitudes, skills and knowledge-based researchers’ competencies (ASK-RC), academic affiliation (AA) and knowledge management (KM) and its effect on promoting the growth of scholarly international publications (SIPs).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research takes a quantitative approach relying on primary data gathered through a questionnaire-based survey. The study’s target population includes lecturers, managers and researchers involved in research activities in educational institutions. To operationalize the research framework, this study used social cognitive theory (SCT) and the academic community served as an empirical field of study.\n\n\nFindings\nThe primary findings of this research are twofold: ASK-RC and AA are positively and statistically significantly associated with SIP; KM moderates the influence of ASK-RC on SIP.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research adds to the current body of literature on research productivity by providing new information and empirical evidence on improving research productivity and international publication. Moreover, this research offers a new approach to the existing literature stream by operationalizing an underexplored framework from the lens of SCT. This study explains why scientific research productivity is becoming increasingly important to academia and stakeholders. Because scientific works are motivated by the goal of addressing general socioeconomic and environmental concerns, it is possible to address this concern based on SCT. Therefore, this research offers theoretical and managerial implications that may interest academics, professionals and policymakers.\n","PeriodicalId":45590,"journal":{"name":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-09-2022-0289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the attitudes, skills and knowledge-based researchers’ competencies (ASK-RC), academic affiliation (AA) and knowledge management (KM) and its effect on promoting the growth of scholarly international publications (SIPs). Design/methodology/approach This research takes a quantitative approach relying on primary data gathered through a questionnaire-based survey. The study’s target population includes lecturers, managers and researchers involved in research activities in educational institutions. To operationalize the research framework, this study used social cognitive theory (SCT) and the academic community served as an empirical field of study. Findings The primary findings of this research are twofold: ASK-RC and AA are positively and statistically significantly associated with SIP; KM moderates the influence of ASK-RC on SIP. Originality/value This research adds to the current body of literature on research productivity by providing new information and empirical evidence on improving research productivity and international publication. Moreover, this research offers a new approach to the existing literature stream by operationalizing an underexplored framework from the lens of SCT. This study explains why scientific research productivity is becoming increasingly important to academia and stakeholders. Because scientific works are motivated by the goal of addressing general socioeconomic and environmental concerns, it is possible to address this concern based on SCT. Therefore, this research offers theoretical and managerial implications that may interest academics, professionals and policymakers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识管理在推动学术进步中的作用:社会认知理论视角下的实证检验
目的本研究旨在探讨态度、技能、知识型研究人员胜任力(ASK-RC)、学术隶属关系(AA)和知识管理(KM)之间的关系及其对促进学术性国际出版物(sip)增长的作用。设计/方法/方法本研究采用定量方法,依靠通过问卷调查收集的原始数据。该研究的目标人群包括在教育机构从事研究活动的讲师、管理人员和研究人员。本研究以社会认知理论(SCT)为研究框架,以学术界为实证研究领域。本研究的主要发现是:ASK-RC和AA与SIP呈显著正相关;KM调节ASK-RC对SIP的影响。原创性/价值本研究通过提供关于提高研究生产力和国际出版的新信息和经验证据,增加了研究生产力的现有文献。此外,本研究通过从SCT的角度操作一个未被探索的框架,为现有的文献流提供了一种新的方法。这项研究解释了为什么科研生产力对学术界和利益相关者越来越重要。由于科学工作的动机是解决一般社会经济和环境问题的目标,因此有可能基于SCT解决这一问题。因此,本研究提供的理论和管理意义可能会引起学者、专业人士和政策制定者的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Does ethical climate of the organization foster entrepreneurial marketing? The role of work engagement and effective knowledge transfer Knowledge capitalization and perceived fairness of reward in real estate sector: mediating role of shared leadership Role of artificial intelligence (AI) in poverty alleviation: a bibliometric analysis Adopting knowledge-sharing-driven blockchain technology in healthcare: a developing country’s perspective Knowledge sharing in open-source software development communities: a review and synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1