Longing for a Forever Home: Ontological insecurity is collectively produced in fixed-term supportive housing for families

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Housing Theory & Society Pub Date : 2023-02-03 DOI:10.1080/14036096.2023.2173287
Stefanie Plage, Ella Kuskoff, Cameron Parsell, Andrew Clarke, Christine Ablaza, F. Perales
{"title":"Longing for a Forever Home: Ontological insecurity is collectively produced in fixed-term supportive housing for families","authors":"Stefanie Plage, Ella Kuskoff, Cameron Parsell, Andrew Clarke, Christine Ablaza, F. Perales","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2023.2173287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Increasingly unaffordable housing means that family homelessness represents an urgent issue for social policy and practice. Targeting families at risk of homelessness, Supportive Housing for Families (SHF) subsidizes leases and offers support aimed at sustaining tenancies and family unity. We explore how short-term funding cycles in an advanced welfare system impacts experiences with service delivery. Building on housing scholarship employing an ontological security lens, we interrogate the temporal dimensions of SHF, and how these are intertwined with understandings of home in spatial terms. The analyses are based on research conducted to examine a 12-month SHF pilot in Southeast Queensland, Australia. We analyse qualitative interviews conducted with families (n=17), statutory child protection officers (n=7), and SHF support workers (n=10) involved in this pilot. Findings indicate that fixed-term funding impacts every aspect of service delivery, resulting in the collective production of ontological insecurity, as families continue to long for a forever home.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"40 1","pages":"394 - 410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Theory & Society","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2023.2173287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Increasingly unaffordable housing means that family homelessness represents an urgent issue for social policy and practice. Targeting families at risk of homelessness, Supportive Housing for Families (SHF) subsidizes leases and offers support aimed at sustaining tenancies and family unity. We explore how short-term funding cycles in an advanced welfare system impacts experiences with service delivery. Building on housing scholarship employing an ontological security lens, we interrogate the temporal dimensions of SHF, and how these are intertwined with understandings of home in spatial terms. The analyses are based on research conducted to examine a 12-month SHF pilot in Southeast Queensland, Australia. We analyse qualitative interviews conducted with families (n=17), statutory child protection officers (n=7), and SHF support workers (n=10) involved in this pilot. Findings indicate that fixed-term funding impacts every aspect of service delivery, resulting in the collective production of ontological insecurity, as families continue to long for a forever home.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
渴望永远的家:本体论的不安全感是在固定期限的家庭保障性住房中共同产生的
越来越难以负担的住房意味着家庭无家可归成为社会政策和实践中的一个紧迫问题。针对面临无家可归风险的家庭,家庭支助住房(SHF)为租赁提供补贴,并提供旨在维持租赁和家庭团结的支持。我们探讨了先进福利制度的短期资金周期如何影响服务提供的经验。在住房奖学金的基础上,我们采用本体论的安全镜头,询问SHF的时间维度,以及这些如何与空间方面的家庭理解交织在一起。这些分析是基于对澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部为期12个月的SHF试点进行的研究。我们分析了对参与该试点的家庭(n=17)、法定儿童保护官员(n=7)和SHF支持工作者(n=10)进行的定性访谈。研究结果表明,定期资助影响到服务提供的各个方面,导致集体产生本体论上的不安全感,因为家庭继续渴望一个永远的家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Co-Living, Gentlemen’s Clubs, and Residential Hotels: A Long View of Shared Housing Infrastructures for Single Young Professionals Toward a feminist housing commons? Conceptualising care - (as) - work in collaborative housing Acquaintances or Familiar Strangers? How Similarity and Spatial Proximity Shape Neighbour Relations within Residential Buildings Balancing Accumulation and Affordability: How Dutch Housing Politics Moved from Private-Rental Liberalization to Regulation Green Neighbourhood Identity: How Residents Use Urban Nature Against Territorial Stigmatization in Finnish Housing Estates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1