The New Global Direction: From “One Globalization” to “Two Globalizations”? Russia’s War in Ukraine in Global Perspective

IF 0.8 Q1 HISTORY New Global Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI:10.1515/ngs-2022-0038
R. Benedikter
{"title":"The New Global Direction: From “One Globalization” to “Two Globalizations”? Russia’s War in Ukraine in Global Perspective","authors":"R. Benedikter","doi":"10.1515/ngs-2022-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Roland Benedikter surveys the views of globalization experts, politicians, opinion leaders, intellectuals, and international media regarding Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. On this basis, he draws conclusions about the impact on – and prospect for – the overall course and further direction of globalization. Given the general turn toward re-globalization that the globe has witnessed already since the mid of the 2010s, the question is if the liberal global order is transiting from the “one globalization” concept – as generated by the open societies of the West and Europe after 1989/91 – to a “two globalizations” system inspired by the joint rise of non-democratic and authoritarian powers such as Russia and China since the 2010s. Their now programmatic aspiration to create a “second world order” or a “parallel globalization” is using Russia’s Ukraine war as leverage to unify anti-Western powers in order to start to compete with the West’s idea of the future on the macro-, meso- and micro-levels. The competition between two different concepts of “globalization” will unfold according to the different understandings of what a productively globalized society – including reforms to be implemented through the re-globalization process – is and should be. The opposition between the authoritarian’s and democrat’s concepts of “participatory” societies is instrumental to shape and drive the contest between the “two globalizations.”","PeriodicalId":42013,"journal":{"name":"New Global Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"71 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Global Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2022-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Roland Benedikter surveys the views of globalization experts, politicians, opinion leaders, intellectuals, and international media regarding Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. On this basis, he draws conclusions about the impact on – and prospect for – the overall course and further direction of globalization. Given the general turn toward re-globalization that the globe has witnessed already since the mid of the 2010s, the question is if the liberal global order is transiting from the “one globalization” concept – as generated by the open societies of the West and Europe after 1989/91 – to a “two globalizations” system inspired by the joint rise of non-democratic and authoritarian powers such as Russia and China since the 2010s. Their now programmatic aspiration to create a “second world order” or a “parallel globalization” is using Russia’s Ukraine war as leverage to unify anti-Western powers in order to start to compete with the West’s idea of the future on the macro-, meso- and micro-levels. The competition between two different concepts of “globalization” will unfold according to the different understandings of what a productively globalized society – including reforms to be implemented through the re-globalization process – is and should be. The opposition between the authoritarian’s and democrat’s concepts of “participatory” societies is instrumental to shape and drive the contest between the “two globalizations.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球新方向:从“一个全球化”到“两个全球化”?全球视角下的俄罗斯乌克兰战争
罗兰·本尼迪克特调查了全球化专家、政治家、意见领袖、知识分子和国际媒体对俄罗斯2022年入侵乌克兰的看法。在此基础上,他对全球化的总体进程和进一步发展方向的影响和前景做出了结论。考虑到自2010年代中期以来全球已经见证的普遍转向再全球化,问题是,自由主义的全球秩序是否正在从1989/91年后由西方和欧洲的开放社会所产生的“一个全球化”概念过渡到2010年代以来由俄罗斯和中国等非民主和专制大国的共同崛起所激发的“两个全球化”体系。他们现在有计划地渴望建立“第二世界秩序”或“平行全球化”,他们利用俄罗斯的乌克兰战争作为杠杆,统一反西方大国,以便开始在宏观、中观和微观层面上与西方的未来理念竞争。两种不同的“全球化”概念之间的竞争将根据对一个富有成效的全球化社会- -包括通过再全球化进程实施的改革- -是什么和应该是什么的不同理解展开。威权主义和民主主义“参与式”社会概念之间的对立有助于塑造和推动“两种全球化”之间的竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Of Mountains, Rivers, and Oceans: Geographic Effects on Military Expenditures, 1961–2012 Peter H. Russell. Sovereignty: The Biography of a Claim. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. 192pp. ISBN: 978–1487509095. $29.25 hardcover Theodor Tudoroiu. Globalizations from Below: The Normative Power of the World Social Forum, Ant Traders, Chinese Migrants, and Levantine Cosmopolitanism. New York: Routledge, 2023. 378pp. ISBN: 978–1032323718. £130.00 hardcover Compradors of China’s Global Power: The Colonialization of Hungarian and Nicaraguan Academia through Anti-imperialist Tropes Introduction: The Global 1970s from a History of Emotions Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1