EVALUATION OF AN AERATION SYSTEM FOR FISH CULTURED IN CLOSED SYSTEMS

Amr I. Said, M. Shazly, A. Zedan, A. Hassan
{"title":"EVALUATION OF AN AERATION SYSTEM FOR FISH CULTURED IN CLOSED SYSTEMS","authors":"Amr I. Said, M. Shazly, A. Zedan, A. Hassan","doi":"10.21608/ZJAR.2021.175262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was Carried out at Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research in (2017), to determine the best levels of oxygen supply on growth performance and oxidation status of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis nilollcus), Grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) and Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings stocked at (85%, 10% and 5%), respectively, total of fingerlings with initial weight of weighting (10±0.30) g/fish were reared in tanks i.e., supplied with normal water, air pumping and filtration system applied throughout the experimental period, with 3 replicates to evaluate the effect of perforated pipe location i.e., 0 and 100 cm from the bottom of tanks, distance between holes such as : 10cm, air pressure levels i.e., 0.2 and 0.4 bar on water quality, growth rate of fish and net profit. The obtained results revealed that the perforated pipe located at 100 cm with distance between holes such as: 10 cm and air pressure (P) of 0.4 bar gave the highest average of water quality like pH (7.72±.30 and 8.18±2.48 mg/l), dissolved oxygen (7.42±.29 and 8.38±2.54 mg/l), water temp (27C ±.81), ammonia (0.29±.01 and 0.28±.08 mg/l), total hardness (171.4±6.85 and 170.9±51.97), total alkalinity (165.3 ± 6.61 and 180.7±54.95 mg/l), nitrate (0.01±.0004 and 0.01±.003), nitrite (0.11±.004 and 0.12±.03) for air pressure levels (0.2 and 0.4) bar respectively. Compared with control result which were 6.7±.30, 4.45±2.54, 0.32±01, 25.0±2.16, 340±2.71, 370±12.7, 0.12±008 and 0.40±0.001 for pH, dissolved oxygen, water temp, ammonia, total hardness, total alkalinity, nitrate and nitrite. The highest average of growth rate values; final body weight (74.9±22.77, 77.4±1.16 and71.9±3.59 g), final body length (19.2±5.83, 18.2±.27 and 16.4±0.32 cm), final body weight gain (5±0.20, 4.4±0.06and 4.6±0.09g), final condition factor (1.36±0.05, 1.38±0.23and 2.61±0.26g/cm 3 ) and final feed conversion ratio (1.56±0.47, 1.62±0.02 and1.68 ± 0.03 g/fish), Final SGR were (1.93±0.58, 1.68±0.02 and 2.0 ±0.04%) and final survival rate (%) were (91.8±2.9 , 88.9±2.6 and 90.2±1.2) for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis nilollcus), Grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) and Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and distances between holes of 10 cm and pressure levels of 0.4 bar Respectively. Finally, it could be concluded that, under the similar conditions: The Air pressure (P) level of 0.4 bar, perforated pipe location of 100 cm and distance between holes 10 cm were the best parameters where it gave Significantly high water quality, growth performance (P<0.0001) and survival of fish (P<0.0001) was observed in aerated tanks as compared with the non-aerated tanks.","PeriodicalId":14975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"371-386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ZJAR.2021.175262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study was Carried out at Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research in (2017), to determine the best levels of oxygen supply on growth performance and oxidation status of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis nilollcus), Grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) and Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings stocked at (85%, 10% and 5%), respectively, total of fingerlings with initial weight of weighting (10±0.30) g/fish were reared in tanks i.e., supplied with normal water, air pumping and filtration system applied throughout the experimental period, with 3 replicates to evaluate the effect of perforated pipe location i.e., 0 and 100 cm from the bottom of tanks, distance between holes such as : 10cm, air pressure levels i.e., 0.2 and 0.4 bar on water quality, growth rate of fish and net profit. The obtained results revealed that the perforated pipe located at 100 cm with distance between holes such as: 10 cm and air pressure (P) of 0.4 bar gave the highest average of water quality like pH (7.72±.30 and 8.18±2.48 mg/l), dissolved oxygen (7.42±.29 and 8.38±2.54 mg/l), water temp (27C ±.81), ammonia (0.29±.01 and 0.28±.08 mg/l), total hardness (171.4±6.85 and 170.9±51.97), total alkalinity (165.3 ± 6.61 and 180.7±54.95 mg/l), nitrate (0.01±.0004 and 0.01±.003), nitrite (0.11±.004 and 0.12±.03) for air pressure levels (0.2 and 0.4) bar respectively. Compared with control result which were 6.7±.30, 4.45±2.54, 0.32±01, 25.0±2.16, 340±2.71, 370±12.7, 0.12±008 and 0.40±0.001 for pH, dissolved oxygen, water temp, ammonia, total hardness, total alkalinity, nitrate and nitrite. The highest average of growth rate values; final body weight (74.9±22.77, 77.4±1.16 and71.9±3.59 g), final body length (19.2±5.83, 18.2±.27 and 16.4±0.32 cm), final body weight gain (5±0.20, 4.4±0.06and 4.6±0.09g), final condition factor (1.36±0.05, 1.38±0.23and 2.61±0.26g/cm 3 ) and final feed conversion ratio (1.56±0.47, 1.62±0.02 and1.68 ± 0.03 g/fish), Final SGR were (1.93±0.58, 1.68±0.02 and 2.0 ±0.04%) and final survival rate (%) were (91.8±2.9 , 88.9±2.6 and 90.2±1.2) for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis nilollcus), Grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) and Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and distances between holes of 10 cm and pressure levels of 0.4 bar Respectively. Finally, it could be concluded that, under the similar conditions: The Air pressure (P) level of 0.4 bar, perforated pipe location of 100 cm and distance between holes 10 cm were the best parameters where it gave Significantly high water quality, growth performance (P<0.0001) and survival of fish (P<0.0001) was observed in aerated tanks as compared with the non-aerated tanks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
密闭养殖鱼类曝气系统的评价
本研究于2017年1月在水产养殖研究中心实验室开展,旨在确定尼罗罗非鱼(Oreochromis nilollcus)、灰鲻鱼(Mugil cephalus)和鲤鱼(Cyprinus carpio)鱼种的最佳供氧水平,分别为(85%、10%和5%),初始体重为(10±0.30)g/鱼的鱼种在水箱中饲养,即在正常水的条件下饲养。在整个试验期间,采用抽气和过滤系统,共3次重复,以评估孔管位置(距罐底0和100 cm)、孔距(10cm)、气压(0.2和0.4 bar)对水质、鱼的生长速度和净利润的影响。结果表明,当孔距为10cm、孔距为100cm、气压为0.4 bar时,pH值(7.72±7.72)等水质平均值最高。30和8.18±2.48 mg/l),溶解氧(7.42±2.48 mg/l)。29和8.38±2.54 mg/l),水温(27℃±0.81),氨(0.29±2.54)。0.01和0.28±。总硬度(171.4±6.85和170.9±51.97),总碱度(165.3±6.61和180.7±54.95 mg/l),硝酸盐(0.01±54.95 mg/l)。0004和0.01±0.003),亚硝酸盐(0.11±0.003)。空气压力水平(0.2和0.4)bar分别为004和0.12±0.03)。对照结果为6.7±。pH、溶解氧、水温、氨、总硬度、总碱度、硝酸盐和亚硝酸盐分别为30、4.45±2.54、0.32±01、25.0±2.16、340±2.71、370±12.7、0.12±008和0.40±0.001。生长速率值的最高平均值;最终体重分别为74.9±22.77、77.4±1.16和71.9±3.59 g,最终体长分别为19.2±5.83、18.2±3.59 g。尼罗罗非鱼(Oreochromis nilollcus)的终增重(5±0.20、4.4±0.06和4.6±0.09g)、终条件因子(1.36±0.05、1.38±0.23和2.61±0.26g/ cm3)和终饲料系数(1.56±0.47、1.62±0.02和1.68±0.03 g/鱼)、终SGR(1.93±0.58、1.68±0.02和2.0±0.04%)和终存活率(%)分别为(91.8±2.9、88.9±2.6和90.2±1.2)。灰鲻鱼(Mugil cephalus)和鲤鱼(Cyprinus carpio),孔间距离为10厘米,压力水平为0.4巴。综上所示,在相同条件下,曝气池的最佳参数为气压(P)水平为0.4 bar,穿孔管位置为100 cm,孔距为10 cm,与不曝气池相比,曝气池的水质、生长性能(P<0.0001)和鱼的存活率(P<0.0001)均显著高于不曝气池。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
INDUCTION OF VEGETATIVE GROWTH AFTER HARVESTING OF FRUITS IN MANGO CV. SAMMAR BAHISHT CHAUNSA BY USING DIFFERENT CHEMICALS DEVELOPMENT, STANDARDIZATION, PHYSICO-CHEMICAL AND NUTRITIONAL ANALYSIS OF BISCUITS DEVELOPED WITH DIFFERENT REPLACEMENT LEVELS OF PUMPKIN FLESH POWDER ORGANIC MULCHING TO CONSERVE SOIL NUTRITIONAL QUALITY AND ENHANCE WHEAT YIELD APPLICATION OF MACHINE LEARNING IN ESTIMATING ONTREE YIELD OF CITRUS FRUIT FAT HEN INCORPORATED AND RHIZOSPHERE SOIL AFFECTS THE GERMINATION AND SEEDLING GROWTH OF MUNGBEAN AND MAIZE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1