Judicial Determination of Confidentiality in Trade Secrets

Hong Li, Ming-Yuen S. Ma
{"title":"Judicial Determination of Confidentiality in Trade Secrets","authors":"Hong Li, Ming-Yuen S. Ma","doi":"10.22158/sssr.v4n3p234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trade secrets as one of the core competitiveness of enterprises, related to the survival of enterprises. In the commercial competition, trade secrets is undoubtedly the right person’s wealth code, how the right person to take effective measures to protect trade secrets from being stolen is a matter of concern. In recent years, the practice of trade secret disputes have increased year by year, in the protection of trade secrets dispute cases, the right and the defendant on the identification of trade secrets, especially on the identification of confidentiality has always been the focus of controversy. Even though more and more enterprises on trade secret protection awareness is increasing. But from the many relevant judicial cases, can be seen: trade secrets in practice for trade secrets protection measures still have great loopholes, specifically manifested as: the right to protect the meaning of trade secrets is not clear, the protection of the object is not specific, the duty of confidentiality can not be confidential subject to know or limitations; confidentiality measures and the value of trade secrets are not adaptive; confidentiality measures can not be recognized and so on. This paper combines the recent judicial practice cases, to explore in practice to achieve the “corresponding confidentiality measures” of the core conditions, and in this way for the enterprise to establish trade secret protection system to provide reference.","PeriodicalId":74882,"journal":{"name":"Studies in social science research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in social science research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/sssr.v4n3p234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trade secrets as one of the core competitiveness of enterprises, related to the survival of enterprises. In the commercial competition, trade secrets is undoubtedly the right person’s wealth code, how the right person to take effective measures to protect trade secrets from being stolen is a matter of concern. In recent years, the practice of trade secret disputes have increased year by year, in the protection of trade secrets dispute cases, the right and the defendant on the identification of trade secrets, especially on the identification of confidentiality has always been the focus of controversy. Even though more and more enterprises on trade secret protection awareness is increasing. But from the many relevant judicial cases, can be seen: trade secrets in practice for trade secrets protection measures still have great loopholes, specifically manifested as: the right to protect the meaning of trade secrets is not clear, the protection of the object is not specific, the duty of confidentiality can not be confidential subject to know or limitations; confidentiality measures and the value of trade secrets are not adaptive; confidentiality measures can not be recognized and so on. This paper combines the recent judicial practice cases, to explore in practice to achieve the “corresponding confidentiality measures” of the core conditions, and in this way for the enterprise to establish trade secret protection system to provide reference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商业秘密保密的司法认定
商业秘密作为企业的核心竞争力之一,关系到企业的生死存亡。在商业竞争中,商业秘密无疑是权利人的财富密码,权利人如何采取有效措施保护商业秘密不被窃取是一个值得关注的问题。近年来,商业秘密纠纷的实践逐年增多,在商业秘密保护纠纷案件中,权利人与被告对商业秘密的认定,特别是对商业秘密的认定保密一直是争议的焦点。尽管越来越多的企业对商业秘密的保护意识也在不断增强。但从众多相关司法案例中可以看出:商业秘密在实践中对于商业秘密的保护措施仍然存在很大的漏洞,具体表现为:商业秘密保护权的含义不明确,保护对象不具体,保密义务不能被保密主体知道或限制;保密措施与商业秘密价值不相适应;保密措施不能被认可等。本文结合近期司法实践案例,探讨在实践中实现“相应保密措施”的核心条件,并以此方式为企业建立商业秘密保护制度提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Field Research on Corruption in Private Enterprise -- Taking the "Criminal Law Amendment (12)" as an Opportunity The Relationship between Physical Exercise and Subjective Well-being: a Meta-Analysis based on The Chinese Student Population Application of Power Electronics Technology in Renewable Energy Systems Susan Glaspell’s “Trifles”: A Feminist/Post-Structuralist Reading Research on the Constitutional Reform of Kyrgyzstan and Its Influence on Political Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1