Introduction to the Special Issue: putting the Capitol Breach in context

C. McCauley
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Issue: putting the Capitol Breach in context","authors":"C. McCauley","doi":"10.1080/17467586.2021.1925136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT I introduce the contributions to the Special Issue focused on the Capitol breach of 6 January 2021, and suggest that the breach can only be understood in the context of a long and escalating conflict between Right and Left activists in the U.S. A milestone in this conflict was the interaction between police and protesters at the inauguration of Donald Trump in January 2017. Review of this interaction leads to the recognition that Right activists such as Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are locked in conflict with antifa, which is more than loose talk about Marxism and anarchism.","PeriodicalId":38896,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide","volume":"14 1","pages":"94 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17467586.2021.1925136","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2021.1925136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT I introduce the contributions to the Special Issue focused on the Capitol breach of 6 January 2021, and suggest that the breach can only be understood in the context of a long and escalating conflict between Right and Left activists in the U.S. A milestone in this conflict was the interaction between police and protesters at the inauguration of Donald Trump in January 2017. Review of this interaction leads to the recognition that Right activists such as Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are locked in conflict with antifa, which is more than loose talk about Marxism and anarchism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特刊简介:把国会大厦的破坏背景
摘要:我介绍了《特刊》对2021年1月6日国会大厦被破坏事件的贡献,并建议只有在美国右翼和左翼活动人士之间长期不断升级的冲突背景下才能理解这一事件。这场冲突的里程碑是2017年1月唐纳德·特朗普就职典礼上警察和抗议者之间的互动。对这种互动的回顾导致人们认识到,骄傲男孩和誓言守护者等右翼活动家与反法主义发生了冲突,这不仅仅是对马克思主义和无政府主义的松散讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Should activism be treated as an indicator of attitudes towards political violence? ‘When militias go ‘rogue’: explaining anti-government extremism in so-called ‘pro-nation-state’ militias in the United States of America and Ukraine Perception of human rights, law enforcement interference and justifiability of terrorism: a Cross-National Analysis Why are some suicide terror attacks more newsworthy than others? Measuring the competitive communicative constitution of insurgencies and their opponents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1