A Systematic Review of Staging and Flap Choice in Gender-Affirming Phalloplasty

Catherine A. Wu, D. Jolly, E. Boskey, O. Ganor
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Staging and Flap Choice in Gender-Affirming Phalloplasty","authors":"Catherine A. Wu, D. Jolly, E. Boskey, O. Ganor","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1748884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  As phalloplasty becomes more routinely performed, there is a growing need for an evidence base to guide surgical decision-making. Recent reviews have suggested that flap type and number of stages may affect the high rates of urethral complications seen with phalloplasty, but no rigorous comparison of both has been performed. Methods  A systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect (PROSPERO #158722). All included studies examined urethral complications following gender-affirming phalloplasty in transgender men. Data were extracted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations system. All searches, extractions, and grading were completed by two authors. Results  Twenty-five studies were included with a total of 1,674 patients. Identified flap types included radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, abdominal, and fibular flaps. Surgical techniques varied widely within the flap types. Number of stages ranged from one to four. Stricture and fistula were the most frequently reported complications with considerable variation in the reported rates between studies, even within singular flap types. Data extraction indicated serious quality issues with the published literature, with the majority of studies at high risk of bias due to short follow-up times, inconsistent and incomplete reporting of outcomes, and inconsistent reporting of surgical technique. Conclusion  To date, there is insufficient data to support a preferred flap type to minimize the urethral complication rates of phalloplasty. Further high-quality literature is required to determine the impact of potential factors affecting complications of gender-affirming phalloplasty. Improved literature quality may be facilitated by a standardized set of reporting guidelines.","PeriodicalId":34024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open","volume":"07 1","pages":"e13 - e26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background  As phalloplasty becomes more routinely performed, there is a growing need for an evidence base to guide surgical decision-making. Recent reviews have suggested that flap type and number of stages may affect the high rates of urethral complications seen with phalloplasty, but no rigorous comparison of both has been performed. Methods  A systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect (PROSPERO #158722). All included studies examined urethral complications following gender-affirming phalloplasty in transgender men. Data were extracted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations system. All searches, extractions, and grading were completed by two authors. Results  Twenty-five studies were included with a total of 1,674 patients. Identified flap types included radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, abdominal, and fibular flaps. Surgical techniques varied widely within the flap types. Number of stages ranged from one to four. Stricture and fistula were the most frequently reported complications with considerable variation in the reported rates between studies, even within singular flap types. Data extraction indicated serious quality issues with the published literature, with the majority of studies at high risk of bias due to short follow-up times, inconsistent and incomplete reporting of outcomes, and inconsistent reporting of surgical technique. Conclusion  To date, there is insufficient data to support a preferred flap type to minimize the urethral complication rates of phalloplasty. Further high-quality literature is required to determine the impact of potential factors affecting complications of gender-affirming phalloplasty. Improved literature quality may be facilitated by a standardized set of reporting guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别确认阴茎成形术的分期和皮瓣选择的系统综述
摘要背景 随着阴茎成形术越来越常规,越来越需要一个证据库来指导手术决策。最近的综述表明,皮瓣的类型和分期可能会影响阴茎成形术中尿道并发症的高发生率,但尚未对两者进行严格的比较。方法 PubMed、Google Scholar和ScienceDirect(PROSPERO#158222)进行了系统综述。所有纳入的研究都检查了变性男性性别确认阴茎成形术后的尿道并发症。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目提取数据。使用建议、评估、发展和评价分级系统对证据质量进行了评估。所有的搜索、提取和分级都由两位作者完成。后果 25项研究共涉及1674名患者。已确定的皮瓣类型包括前臂桡侧、大腿前外侧、腹部和腓骨皮瓣。不同类型皮瓣的手术技术差异很大。阶段的数量从一个到四个不等。狭窄和瘘管是最常见的并发症,研究之间的报告率差异很大,即使在单一皮瓣类型中也是如此。数据提取表明,已发表的文献存在严重的质量问题,由于随访时间短、结果报告不一致和不完整以及手术技术报告不一致,大多数研究存在高偏倚风险。结论 到目前为止,没有足够的数据支持首选皮瓣类型,以最大限度地降低阴茎成形术的尿道并发症发生率。需要更多高质量的文献来确定影响性别确认阴茎成形术并发症的潜在因素的影响。一套标准化的报告准则可能有助于提高文献质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Synchronous Abdominal Wall and Small Bowel Transplantation: Critical Insights at Four Year Follow Up Stable Arterial Perforators Mapping in Lower Leg Using Color-coded Doppler Sonography, Acoustic Doppler and Thermal Imaging Camera in Patients Undergoing Digital Subtraction Arteriography Conventional and Robot-Assisted Microvascular Anastomosis - Systematic Review Neo-Forearm Functional Reconstruction after Temporary Ectopic Hand Implantation for Salvage of Hand after Extensive Crush Injury to Forearm Combined Application of a Novel Robotic System and Exoscope for Microsurgical Anastomoses: Preclinical Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1