PedCheck: A Dashboard for Analyzing Social Media Posts about Predatory Journals

IF 0.6 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Serials Review Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00987913.2022.2046459
M. Dadkhah, F. Rahimnia, M. Oermann
{"title":"PedCheck: A Dashboard for Analyzing Social Media Posts about Predatory Journals","authors":"M. Dadkhah, F. Rahimnia, M. Oermann","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2022.2046459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Predatory journals are continuing to expand across disciplines and target researchers via different media such as websites and spam emails to potential authors. While multiple studies have described characteristics of predatory journals, less research has been on done on authors’ perceptions of and experiences with predatory journals. In this paper, by using a data science approach, we developed a tool that analyzes the content of social media and summarizes what users (authors) have shared about predatory journals. This tool is useful in understanding the current concerns of researchers about predatory journals and examining current activities of these journals.","PeriodicalId":54165,"journal":{"name":"Serials Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"224 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serials Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2022.2046459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Predatory journals are continuing to expand across disciplines and target researchers via different media such as websites and spam emails to potential authors. While multiple studies have described characteristics of predatory journals, less research has been on done on authors’ perceptions of and experiences with predatory journals. In this paper, by using a data science approach, we developed a tool that analyzes the content of social media and summarizes what users (authors) have shared about predatory journals. This tool is useful in understanding the current concerns of researchers about predatory journals and examining current activities of these journals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PedCheck:一个分析掠夺性期刊的社交媒体帖子的仪表板
摘要掠夺性期刊正在继续跨学科扩展,并通过不同的媒体(如网站和向潜在作者发送垃圾邮件)瞄准研究人员。虽然多项研究描述了掠夺性期刊的特征,但对作者对掠夺性期刊看法和经历的研究较少。在这篇论文中,通过使用数据科学方法,我们开发了一种工具,分析社交媒体的内容,并总结用户(作者)对掠夺性期刊的分享。该工具有助于了解研究人员目前对掠夺性期刊的担忧,并检查这些期刊的当前活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Serials Review
Serials Review INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Serials Review, issued quarterly, is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal for the international serials community. Articles focus on serials in the broadest sense of the term and cover all aspects of serials information; regular columns feature interviews, exchanges on controversial topics, book reviews, and conference reports. The journal encompasses practical, theoretical, and visionary ideas for librarians, publishers, vendors, and anyone interested in the changing nature of serials. Serials Review covers all aspects of serials management: format considerations, publishing models, statistical studies, collection analysis, collaborative efforts, reference and access issues, cataloging and acquisitions, people who have shaped the serials community, and topical bibliographic studies.
期刊最新文献
An Attitude toward the Collaborative Information Behavior: A Systematic Review The Read Feed: Reviews Overlap Analysis: A Case Study Current and Historical Publication Trends of State Library Association Journals and Newsletters Identifying Combinations of Altmetrics and Web of Science Usage That Linked to Early Citations of an Article Received: A Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1