Measurement of renal congestion and compliance following intravenous fluid administration using shear wave elastography

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care and Resuscitation Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.04.006
Damian Bruce-Hickman MBBS , Zhen Yu Lim MRCP, MMed , Huey Ying Lim MRCP, MMed , Faheem Khan FCEM, FFICM (UK) , Shilpa Rastogi MBBS, MD , Chee Keat Tan MMed (Anaes), FANZCA , Clara Lee Ying Ngoh MB ChB MRCP M.Med, FAMS
{"title":"Measurement of renal congestion and compliance following intravenous fluid administration using shear wave elastography","authors":"Damian Bruce-Hickman MBBS ,&nbsp;Zhen Yu Lim MRCP, MMed ,&nbsp;Huey Ying Lim MRCP, MMed ,&nbsp;Faheem Khan FCEM, FFICM (UK) ,&nbsp;Shilpa Rastogi MBBS, MD ,&nbsp;Chee Keat Tan MMed (Anaes), FANZCA ,&nbsp;Clara Lee Ying Ngoh MB ChB MRCP M.Med, FAMS","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) is a novel technique that may provide non-invasive measurements of renal compliance. We aimed to investigate the relationship between intravenous (IV) fluid administration and change in SWE measurements. We hypothesised that following IV fluid administration in healthy volunteers, global kidney stiffness would increase and that this increase in stiffness could be quantified using SWE. Our second hypothesis was that graduated doses of IV fluids would result in a dose-dependent increase in global kidney stiffness measured by SWE.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised prospective study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Intensive Care Unit.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Healthy volunteers aged 18–40 years.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Participants were randomised to receive 20 ml/kg, 30 ml/kg, or 40 ml/kg of normal saline. The volume of fluid infused was based on the actual body weight recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>We recorded average SWE stiffness (kPa with standard deviation of the mean), median SWE stiffness (kPa), and the interquartile range.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ninety-eight percent of participants (44/45) demonstrated an increase in global kidney stiffness following administration of IV fluids. The average SWE pre fluid administration was 7.572 kPa ± 2.38 versus 14.9 kPa ± 4.81 post fluid administration (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). In subgroup analysis, there were significant changes in global kidney stiffness pre and post fluid administration with each volume (ml/kg) of fluid administered. Average percentage change in global kidney stiffness from baseline was compared between the three groups. There was no significant difference when comparing groups 1 and 2 (197.1% increase ± 49.5 vs 216.1% ± 72.0, p ¼ 0.398), groups 2 and 3 (216.1% increase ± 72.0 vs 197.8% ± 59.9, p ¼ 0.455), or groups 1 and 3 (197.1% increase ± 49.5 vs 197.8% ± 59.9, p ¼ 0.972).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Fluid administration results in immediately visible and quantifiable changes in global kidney stiffness across all infused volumes of fluid.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223000066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) is a novel technique that may provide non-invasive measurements of renal compliance. We aimed to investigate the relationship between intravenous (IV) fluid administration and change in SWE measurements. We hypothesised that following IV fluid administration in healthy volunteers, global kidney stiffness would increase and that this increase in stiffness could be quantified using SWE. Our second hypothesis was that graduated doses of IV fluids would result in a dose-dependent increase in global kidney stiffness measured by SWE.

Design

Randomised prospective study.

Setting

Intensive Care Unit.

Participants

Healthy volunteers aged 18–40 years.

Interventions

Participants were randomised to receive 20 ml/kg, 30 ml/kg, or 40 ml/kg of normal saline. The volume of fluid infused was based on the actual body weight recorded.

Main outcome measures

We recorded average SWE stiffness (kPa with standard deviation of the mean), median SWE stiffness (kPa), and the interquartile range.

Results

Ninety-eight percent of participants (44/45) demonstrated an increase in global kidney stiffness following administration of IV fluids. The average SWE pre fluid administration was 7.572 kPa ± 2.38 versus 14.9 kPa ± 4.81 post fluid administration (p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, there were significant changes in global kidney stiffness pre and post fluid administration with each volume (ml/kg) of fluid administered. Average percentage change in global kidney stiffness from baseline was compared between the three groups. There was no significant difference when comparing groups 1 and 2 (197.1% increase ± 49.5 vs 216.1% ± 72.0, p ¼ 0.398), groups 2 and 3 (216.1% increase ± 72.0 vs 197.8% ± 59.9, p ¼ 0.455), or groups 1 and 3 (197.1% increase ± 49.5 vs 197.8% ± 59.9, p ¼ 0.972).

Conclusions

Fluid administration results in immediately visible and quantifiable changes in global kidney stiffness across all infused volumes of fluid.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用剪切波弹性成像测量静脉输液后肾充血和顺应性
目的超声横波弹性成像(SWE)是一种可以无创测量肾脏顺应性的新技术。我们的目的是研究静脉(IV)输液与SWE测量变化之间的关系。我们假设在健康志愿者进行静脉输液后,整体肾脏硬度会增加,并且这种硬度的增加可以使用SWE进行量化。我们的第二个假设是,逐步剂量的静脉输液会导致SWE测量的整体肾脏硬度的剂量依赖性增加。随机前瞻性研究。设置重症监护病房。参与者:18-40岁的健康志愿者。干预措施:参与者被随机分配接受20ml /kg、30ml /kg或40ml /kg生理盐水。输入的液体量是根据实际体重记录的。主要结果测量:我们记录了平均SWE刚度(kPa,平均值的标准差)、中位SWE刚度(kPa)和四分位数范围。结果:98%的参与者(44/45)在静脉输液后表现出整体肾脏僵硬度增加。注射前平均SWE为7.572 kPa±2.38,注射后为14.9 kPa±4.81 (p <0.001)。在亚组分析中,给液前后肾脏硬度随给液体积(ml/kg)的变化有显著变化。比较三组患者从基线开始的总体肾脏硬度的平均百分比变化。1、2组(197.1%增加±49.5 vs 216.1%±72.0,p¼0.398)、2、3组(216.1%增加±72.0 vs 197.8%±59.9,p¼0.455)、1、3组(197.1%增加±49.5 vs 197.8%±59.9,p¼0.972)比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:在所有输注量的液体中,给药可立即产生可见的、可量化的整体肾脏硬度变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Critical Care and Resuscitation CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines. The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world. The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Recommendations for the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM) trainee research project: A modified Delphi study ARDS, guidelines and ANZ practice: The persistent disconnect Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study Sonographic evaluation of intracranial hemodynamics and pressure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An exploratory sub-study of the TAME trial A retrospective registry-based study into the proportion of patients admitted to intensive care who have anaphylaxis as a principal diagnosis and their outcomes in Australia and New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1