Toward cost-effective service excellence: Exploring the relationship between managers’ perceptions of quality and the operational efficiency and profitability of restaurants

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Quality Management Journal Pub Date : 2020-03-19 DOI:10.1080/10686967.2020.1722046
Marko Kukanja, T. Planinc
{"title":"Toward cost-effective service excellence: Exploring the relationship between managers’ perceptions of quality and the operational efficiency and profitability of restaurants","authors":"Marko Kukanja, T. Planinc","doi":"10.1080/10686967.2020.1722046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigates the relationships between managers’ perceptions of service quality, operational efficiency, and profitability. The DINESERV tool was applied to assess managers’ perceptions of service quality, and firms’ financial reports were used to analyze operational efficiency and profitability. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed to analyze managers’ perceptions of quality, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used to assess operational efficiency, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to assess the model. Results reveal that, according to managers’ beliefs, only three quality dimensions – empathy, assurance, and tangibles – are important for delivering high-quality services. Based on the results of DEA and SEM, four groups of restaurants were formulated: lower success and lower efficiency (A), higher success and higher efficiency (B), lower success and higher efficiency (C), and higher success and lower efficiency (D). Results reveal that managers’ perceptions of quality significantly vary depending on the level of operational efficiency and profitability.","PeriodicalId":38208,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"105 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10686967.2020.1722046","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2020.1722046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the relationships between managers’ perceptions of service quality, operational efficiency, and profitability. The DINESERV tool was applied to assess managers’ perceptions of service quality, and firms’ financial reports were used to analyze operational efficiency and profitability. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed to analyze managers’ perceptions of quality, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used to assess operational efficiency, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to assess the model. Results reveal that, according to managers’ beliefs, only three quality dimensions – empathy, assurance, and tangibles – are important for delivering high-quality services. Based on the results of DEA and SEM, four groups of restaurants were formulated: lower success and lower efficiency (A), higher success and higher efficiency (B), lower success and higher efficiency (C), and higher success and lower efficiency (D). Results reveal that managers’ perceptions of quality significantly vary depending on the level of operational efficiency and profitability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
追求具有成本效益的卓越服务:探讨经理对质量的看法与餐厅的运营效率和盈利能力之间的关系
摘要本研究调查了管理者对服务质量、运营效率和盈利能力的感知之间的关系。DINESERV工具用于评估管理者对服务质量的看法,企业的财务报告用于分析运营效率和盈利能力。探索性因素分析(EFA)用于分析管理者对质量的感知,数据包络分析(DEA)用于评估运营效率,结构方程模型(SEM)用于评估该模型。结果表明,根据管理者的信念,只有三个质量维度——同理心、保证和有形资产——对提供高质量服务很重要。基于DEA和SEM的结果,制定了四组餐厅:低成功低效率(A)、高成功高效率(B)、低成功高效率(C)和高成功低效(D)。研究结果表明,管理者对质量的看法因运营效率和盈利水平的不同而有很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality Management Journal
Quality Management Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Private hospitals quality assessment: Evidence from Jordan using HEALTHQUAL model The Role of Top Management Commitment, Employee Involvement, and Training and Development on Employee Performance: Evidence from the Banking Sector of an Emerging Economy Investigating the critical success factors for integrating Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 Determinants of working capital management for noncertified and certified firms from the EFQM Excellence Model Quality aspects vs consumption values: What affects intention to book hotels in the post-Covid era?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1