Understanding Faith Formation: Theological, Congregational, and Global Dimensions

Anne-Marie Ellithorpe
{"title":"Understanding Faith Formation: Theological, Congregational, and Global Dimensions","authors":"Anne-Marie Ellithorpe","doi":"10.1177/20569971211019652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Understanding Faith Formation, North American evangelical theologians and educators Mark A Maddix, Jonathan H Kim and James Riley Estep seek to articulate an integrated and holistic approach to faith formation. Through this work they aim to provoke conversation about matters of faith and faith formation and help readers grow and mature in their faith. The authors encourage readers to recognize faith as being expressed and lived out in particular contexts. Ideally such awareness provokes the re-examination of presuppositions about one’s faith and the recognition that ‘people from other cultures may mature in their faith in different ways’ (p. x). This book is divided into three parts. Part 1 focuses on theological dimensions of faith formation and acknowledges biblical, traditional and theoretical diversity. Intriguingly, the authors identify a study of faith in the First Testament as revealing more about God than about the faith of the people. They acknowledge personal and corporate dimensions of faith as expressed in diverse church traditions.Maddix,Kim andEstep revisit James Fowler’smodel of faith formation and present a model of faith formation comprised of four stages: converging faith, consolidating faith, conforming faith and contagious faith. The authors describe evangelical Christians as moving through these stages in a ‘non-mechanical fashion’ (p. 45). As noted, this model, based on qualitative research with 429 evangelical Christians aged 18 to 66, is ‘in an incipient stage’ and requires further development along with validation through replicating the study with ‘a different Christian population’ (p. 46). However, there is no indication of what subset/s of the US evangelical Christian population these initial participants have been drawn from, nor of other characteristics of participants. The outcome of the final stage of contagious faith is presented as selfless service. This stage would benefit from further description and exploration, including acknowledgement of terminology challenges, given that the language of self-sacrifice has been misused to the detriment of marginalized populations. Part 2 acknowledges congregational dimensions of faith formation. The authors identify biblical illiteracy, Moral Therapeutic Deism and the rejection of religious faith among the nones (those who self-identify as having no religious affiliation, International Journal of Christianity & Education","PeriodicalId":13840,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Christianity & Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"363 - 364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20569971211019652","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Christianity & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20569971211019652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Understanding Faith Formation, North American evangelical theologians and educators Mark A Maddix, Jonathan H Kim and James Riley Estep seek to articulate an integrated and holistic approach to faith formation. Through this work they aim to provoke conversation about matters of faith and faith formation and help readers grow and mature in their faith. The authors encourage readers to recognize faith as being expressed and lived out in particular contexts. Ideally such awareness provokes the re-examination of presuppositions about one’s faith and the recognition that ‘people from other cultures may mature in their faith in different ways’ (p. x). This book is divided into three parts. Part 1 focuses on theological dimensions of faith formation and acknowledges biblical, traditional and theoretical diversity. Intriguingly, the authors identify a study of faith in the First Testament as revealing more about God than about the faith of the people. They acknowledge personal and corporate dimensions of faith as expressed in diverse church traditions.Maddix,Kim andEstep revisit James Fowler’smodel of faith formation and present a model of faith formation comprised of four stages: converging faith, consolidating faith, conforming faith and contagious faith. The authors describe evangelical Christians as moving through these stages in a ‘non-mechanical fashion’ (p. 45). As noted, this model, based on qualitative research with 429 evangelical Christians aged 18 to 66, is ‘in an incipient stage’ and requires further development along with validation through replicating the study with ‘a different Christian population’ (p. 46). However, there is no indication of what subset/s of the US evangelical Christian population these initial participants have been drawn from, nor of other characteristics of participants. The outcome of the final stage of contagious faith is presented as selfless service. This stage would benefit from further description and exploration, including acknowledgement of terminology challenges, given that the language of self-sacrifice has been misused to the detriment of marginalized populations. Part 2 acknowledges congregational dimensions of faith formation. The authors identify biblical illiteracy, Moral Therapeutic Deism and the rejection of religious faith among the nones (those who self-identify as having no religious affiliation, International Journal of Christianity & Education
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解信仰的形成:神学、公理和全球维度
在《理解信仰形成》一书中,北美福音派神学家和教育家马克·A·马迪克斯、乔纳森·H·金和詹姆斯·莱利·埃step试图阐明一种信仰形成的综合和整体方法。通过这本书,他们的目的是激发关于信仰和信仰形成的话题,帮助读者在信仰中成长和成熟。作者鼓励读者认识到信仰是在特定的语境中被表达和活出来的。理想情况下,这种意识会促使人们重新审视对自己信仰的预设,并认识到“来自其他文化的人可能以不同的方式使自己的信仰成熟”(第x页)。本书分为三个部分。第一部分着重于信仰形成的神学维度,并承认圣经、传统和理论的多样性。有趣的是,作者认为对《第一约》信仰的研究更多地揭示了上帝,而不是人们的信仰。他们承认在不同的教会传统中所表达的个人和集体的信仰层面。Maddix、Kim和destep重新审视了James Fowler的信仰形成模型,提出了一个由四个阶段组成的信仰形成模型:融合信仰、巩固信仰、顺从信仰和传染信仰。作者将福音派基督徒描述为以“非机械的方式”经历这些阶段(第45页)。如上所述,该模型基于对429名年龄在18岁至66岁之间的福音派基督徒的定性研究,“处于初级阶段”,需要进一步发展,并通过在“不同的基督徒群体”中重复研究来验证(第46页)。然而,没有迹象表明这些最初的参与者来自美国福音派基督徒人口的哪个子集,也没有参与者的其他特征。传染信仰的最后阶段的结果是无私的服务。这一阶段将受益于进一步的描述和探索,包括承认术语的挑战,因为自我牺牲的语言已被滥用,损害了边缘人口。第二部分承认信仰形成的会众层面。《国际基督教与教育杂志》的作者们指出了圣经文盲、道德治疗自然神论和无信者(那些自认为没有宗教信仰的人)对宗教信仰的拒绝
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
40.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
The influence of isokinetic dynamometer configuration on eccentric hamstring strength metrics: implications for testing and training. Christian higher education in fractured societies: Societal challenges and agapeic wisdom Cultivating Mentors: Sharing Wisdom in Christian Higher Education Fractal imagination and Christian formation The child and God: Some reflections from disability theology on divine-child encounters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1