Polarization in Environmental Donations: Application to Deforestation-Prevention Donation

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Land Economics Pub Date : 2022-04-21 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4001175
Dede Long, Hongxing Liu, R. Nayga
{"title":"Polarization in Environmental Donations: Application to Deforestation-Prevention Donation","authors":"Dede Long, Hongxing Liu, R. Nayga","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4001175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One common fundraising strategy used by nonprofit organizations is providing information to persuade potential donors. We theoretically and empirically analyze how information affects people’s willingness to donate. Our theory suggests when people have different initial beliefs, new information leads to polarization through their understanding and rationalization of social norms. We provide empirical support using an online experiment, demonstrating that environmental and public health information leads to polarization in deforestation prevention donations. Being exposed to information opposite of individuals’ existing beliefs reinforces their current opinions. Our results emphasize that implementing information treatment calls for careful deliberation.","PeriodicalId":51378,"journal":{"name":"Land Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4001175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One common fundraising strategy used by nonprofit organizations is providing information to persuade potential donors. We theoretically and empirically analyze how information affects people’s willingness to donate. Our theory suggests when people have different initial beliefs, new information leads to polarization through their understanding and rationalization of social norms. We provide empirical support using an online experiment, demonstrating that environmental and public health information leads to polarization in deforestation prevention donations. Being exposed to information opposite of individuals’ existing beliefs reinforces their current opinions. Our results emphasize that implementing information treatment calls for careful deliberation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境捐赠的两极分化:在防治毁林捐赠中的应用
非营利组织常用的一种筹款策略是提供信息说服潜在的捐赠者。我们从理论和实证上分析了信息如何影响人们的捐赠意愿。我们的理论表明,当人们有不同的初始信仰时,新的信息会通过他们对社会规范的理解和合理化而导致两极分化。我们通过一项在线实验提供了实证支持,证明环境和公共卫生信息导致了森林砍伐预防捐款的两极分化。暴露在与个人现有信仰相反的信息中会强化他们当前的观点。我们的研究结果强调,实施信息处理需要仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Economics
Land Economics Multiple-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Land Economics is dedicated to the study of land use, natural resources, public utilities, housing, and urban land issues. Established in 1925 by the renowned economist and founder of the American Economic Association, Richard T. Ely at the University of Wisconsin, Land Economics has consistently published innovative, conceptual, and empirical research of direct relevance to economists. Each issue brings the latest results in international applied research on such topics as transportation, energy, urban and rural land use, housing, environmental quality, public utilities, and natural resources.
期刊最新文献
Does Peer Adoption Increase the Diffusion of Pollution Prevention Practices? The Impact of Weather Risk on Tenure Security Race and Concern for the Environment The Demand for Voluntary Carbon Dioxide Removal Housing Market Capitalization of Pipeline Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1