Moravian Encounters with Refugees in South Africa: A Contribution to the Debate on the Origins of the Fingos

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Journal of Moravian History Pub Date : 2018-11-07 DOI:10.5325/JMORAHIST.18.2.0159
P. Boon
{"title":"Moravian Encounters with Refugees in South Africa: A Contribution to the Debate on the Origins of the Fingos","authors":"P. Boon","doi":"10.5325/JMORAHIST.18.2.0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article endeavors to contribute to the debate on the origins of the Fingos. Special attention is given to the Moravian encounters with the Fingos in the 1820s and 1830s. The author argues that Moravian writings, although not objective, can be helpful to contemporary debates in South African historiography. Moravian evidence supports the proposition that the Fingos were not an ethnic unity before their influx into the Cape Colony. Yet on the other hand, it supports that they entered the colony as refugees, and not as forced labor. The Fingo origins were closely linked to the period of the Mfecane. Moravian evidence points to a middle position between the extremes of the current debate about Fingo origins. Their origins were not a monocausal European matter. The switch of allegiance of the Fingos from the Xhosas to the British was a conscious decision. Moravian writings explain that the Fingos consisted of a hodgepodge of refugees. Although no one is objective, in recent historiography the writings of missionaries have been discredited perhaps too easily, and especially the writings of non-English missionaries active in South Africa were scarcely used until present.","PeriodicalId":40312,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moravian History","volume":"18 1","pages":"159 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Moravian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMORAHIST.18.2.0159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:This article endeavors to contribute to the debate on the origins of the Fingos. Special attention is given to the Moravian encounters with the Fingos in the 1820s and 1830s. The author argues that Moravian writings, although not objective, can be helpful to contemporary debates in South African historiography. Moravian evidence supports the proposition that the Fingos were not an ethnic unity before their influx into the Cape Colony. Yet on the other hand, it supports that they entered the colony as refugees, and not as forced labor. The Fingo origins were closely linked to the period of the Mfecane. Moravian evidence points to a middle position between the extremes of the current debate about Fingo origins. Their origins were not a monocausal European matter. The switch of allegiance of the Fingos from the Xhosas to the British was a conscious decision. Moravian writings explain that the Fingos consisted of a hodgepodge of refugees. Although no one is objective, in recent historiography the writings of missionaries have been discredited perhaps too easily, and especially the writings of non-English missionaries active in South Africa were scarcely used until present.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摩拉维亚人与南非难民的相遇:对芬戈人起源辩论的贡献
本文试图对芬戈语起源的争论有所贡献。特别关注的是19世纪20年代和30年代摩拉维亚人与芬戈人的遭遇。作者认为,摩拉维亚的著作,虽然不客观,可以帮助当代南非史学的辩论。摩拉维亚证据支持芬戈人在涌入开普殖民地之前不是一个民族统一的主张。但另一方面,它支持他们作为难民进入殖民地,而不是作为强迫劳工。Fingo的起源与Mfecane时期密切相关。摩拉维亚人的证据表明,在当前关于芬戈人起源的争论的两个极端之间,存在着一种中间立场。它们的起源并不是单一原因的欧洲问题。芬戈人从科萨人转向英国人是一个有意识的决定。摩拉维亚人的著作解释说芬戈人是由一群难民组成的大杂烩。虽然没有人是客观的,但在最近的史学中,传教士的著作可能太容易受到质疑,尤其是活跃在南非的非英国传教士的著作,直到现在才被很少使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Missionaries and Modernity: Education in the British Empire, 1830–1910 Babel of the Atlantic Peter Boehler’s Universalist Letter Spangenberg’s 1760 Letter about Slaveholding in St. Thomas and Bethlehem Slavery in Bethlehem: Difference and Indifference in Northampton County’s Moravian Settlements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1