Apolitiška karta: kodėl jauniems Lietuvos žmonėms neįdomi politika

Q4 Social Sciences Politologija Pub Date : 2018-12-07 DOI:10.15388/POLIT.2018.92.1
Aušrinė Diržinskaitė
{"title":"Apolitiška karta: kodėl jauniems Lietuvos žmonėms neįdomi politika","authors":"Aušrinė Diržinskaitė","doi":"10.15388/POLIT.2018.92.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English] \nIn the recent years, consolidated democracies have faced a great decline in citizens’ participation and interest in political life. The latest researches show that young people are especially disengaged and alien to political life. Moreover, Lithuania seems to have the greatest number of young people who are not interested in politics in the “so-called” developed world (OECD countries and candidates) and has the highest gap between the general and the youth interest in politics. Therefore, this article analyzes what are the reasons for the disinterest in politics of the youth in Lithuania. \nContemporary theories and empirical researches suggest rather different answers to the question. In particular, it is said that youths’ interest in politics can be determined by three categories of factors: socioeconomic/sociodemographic (income, wellbeing, education, race and gender), psychological (political efficacy: self-confidence as internal political efficacy and trust in political system as external political efficacy) as well as socializing factors (discussions with family and friends, media, volunteering). \nIn order to find why Lithuania has such a high level of youth disinterest in politics, the analysis is performed on an individual level. Logistic regression analysis shows that the most relevant determinants for the youth interest in politics in Lithuania are a greater usage of media, accompanied with more frequent discussions with family and friends, a higher trust in the parliament as well as a higher level of education. Yet, the greatest determinant of whether a young person will be interested in politics are the elections; i.e., data from the year 2016 signalizes a much greater youth interest in politics compared to the 2012, thus inviting to analyze more deeply the existing differences between the two elections. \nTo check if the variables had proved significant on the individual level, bore any semblance on the country level and explained the exception of Lithuania, an aggregate analysis was conducted. Correlations were found between the level of youth disinterest in politics and income per capita, trust in the national government, discussions with friends and the usage of media. Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia appear to be in one group based on most of the analyzed criteria. Though altogether these factors seem to be pretty good determinants, the Lithuanian case is, however, not fully explained by them – a regression model is unable to predict almost one fifth of the young people that are disinterested in politics in Lithuania. Thus, the usual suspects do not explain this phenomenon fully, and particular countries should be explored more deeply.","PeriodicalId":35151,"journal":{"name":"Politologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/POLIT.2018.92.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

[full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English] In the recent years, consolidated democracies have faced a great decline in citizens’ participation and interest in political life. The latest researches show that young people are especially disengaged and alien to political life. Moreover, Lithuania seems to have the greatest number of young people who are not interested in politics in the “so-called” developed world (OECD countries and candidates) and has the highest gap between the general and the youth interest in politics. Therefore, this article analyzes what are the reasons for the disinterest in politics of the youth in Lithuania. Contemporary theories and empirical researches suggest rather different answers to the question. In particular, it is said that youths’ interest in politics can be determined by three categories of factors: socioeconomic/sociodemographic (income, wellbeing, education, race and gender), psychological (political efficacy: self-confidence as internal political efficacy and trust in political system as external political efficacy) as well as socializing factors (discussions with family and friends, media, volunteering). In order to find why Lithuania has such a high level of youth disinterest in politics, the analysis is performed on an individual level. Logistic regression analysis shows that the most relevant determinants for the youth interest in politics in Lithuania are a greater usage of media, accompanied with more frequent discussions with family and friends, a higher trust in the parliament as well as a higher level of education. Yet, the greatest determinant of whether a young person will be interested in politics are the elections; i.e., data from the year 2016 signalizes a much greater youth interest in politics compared to the 2012, thus inviting to analyze more deeply the existing differences between the two elections. To check if the variables had proved significant on the individual level, bore any semblance on the country level and explained the exception of Lithuania, an aggregate analysis was conducted. Correlations were found between the level of youth disinterest in politics and income per capita, trust in the national government, discussions with friends and the usage of media. Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia appear to be in one group based on most of the analyzed criteria. Though altogether these factors seem to be pretty good determinants, the Lithuanian case is, however, not fully explained by them – a regression model is unable to predict almost one fifth of the young people that are disinterested in politics in Lithuania. Thus, the usual suspects do not explain this phenomenon fully, and particular countries should be explored more deeply.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不爱批判的一代:立陶宛年轻人为何对政治不感兴趣
[立陶宛文全文和摘要;近年来,巩固的民主国家面临着公民对政治生活的参与和兴趣大幅下降的问题。最新的研究表明,年轻人对政治生活尤其疏离和陌生。此外,在“所谓的”发达国家(经合组织国家和候选人)中,立陶宛似乎有最多的年轻人对政治不感兴趣,而普通民众和年轻人对政治的兴趣之间的差距也最大。因此,本文分析了立陶宛青年对政治不感兴趣的原因。当代理论和实证研究对这个问题给出了截然不同的答案。特别是,据说年轻人对政治的兴趣可以由三类因素决定:社会经济/社会人口(收入,福利,教育,种族和性别),心理(政治效能:自信作为内部政治效能,对政治制度的信任作为外部政治效能)以及社交因素(与家人和朋友的讨论,媒体,志愿服务)。为了找出为什么立陶宛有如此高的年轻人对政治不感兴趣,分析是在个人层面上进行的。逻辑回归分析显示,立陶宛年轻人对政治感兴趣的最相关决定因素是媒体的更多使用、与家人和朋友更频繁的讨论、对议会的更高信任以及更高的教育水平。然而,决定年轻人是否对政治感兴趣的最大因素是选举;也就是说,2016年的数据表明,与2012年相比,年轻人对政治的兴趣要大得多,因此需要更深入地分析两次选举之间存在的差异。为了检查这些变量是否在个人层面上被证明是显著的,在国家层面上是否有任何相似之处,并解释立陶宛的例外情况,进行了汇总分析。研究发现,年轻人对政治不感兴趣的程度与人均收入、对国家政府的信任、与朋友的讨论以及媒体的使用之间存在相关性。根据大多数分析标准,立陶宛、捷克共和国、匈牙利和斯洛伐克似乎属于一类。虽然这些因素似乎都是很好的决定因素,但立陶宛的情况并不能完全由它们来解释,回归模型无法预测立陶宛近五分之一对政治不感兴趣的年轻人。因此,通常的怀疑并不能完全解释这一现象,应该对特定的国家进行更深入的探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politologija
Politologija Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tarp sėkmės ir katastrofos: dvi perspektyvos į perėjimo procesą postkomunistinėse valstybėse Challenging Political Representation in the Era of Big Data Nuo akmens iki sėklos: objektai ir kontratminties aktyvizmas Brazilijoje antikolonijinio demonumentalizavimo sąlygomis Aukštų pareigūnų skyrimas pusiau prezidentiniame modelyje: Lietuvos atvejis* The Theoretical Model of Smart Governance in Local Government
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1