La regulación de las nanotecnologías en Argentina. Sobre polisemia e inestabilidad de los nano-objetos

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Revista de la Facultad de Derecho Pub Date : 2018-07-22 DOI:10.22187/rfd2018n45a1
Gonzalo L. Bailo
{"title":"La regulación de las nanotecnologías en Argentina. Sobre polisemia e inestabilidad de los nano-objetos","authors":"Gonzalo L. Bailo","doi":"10.22187/rfd2018n45a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is framed in the area of Science and Technology Studies (STS) that studies the relationships between law, democracy and nanotechnologies. It is analyzed nanotechnologies regulatory experience in Argentina between 2001-2017 by tracing and processing national bills, institutional initiatives and expert discourses committed on the coproduction of a “nano” scientific-legal knowledge. It is identified two major phases. The first phase (2001-2006) leads to the creation by decree of the Argentinian Nanotechnology Foundation (FAN) and includes several critics about it. The second phase (2007-present) begins with the creation of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation Ministry (MINCyT) and adopts a “nano” governance model that combines expert institutionalism with the implementation of global standardization regulation. It is concluded that the instability and polysemic character of nano-objects repositions various types of knowledge as mediators of regulatory and institutional models. This paper aims to contribute: a) in general, to current discussions about the legal modes of stabilizing controversial objects; b) in particular, to describe how legal actors visualize nano-objects in Argentina.","PeriodicalId":53805,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22187/rfd2018n45a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is framed in the area of Science and Technology Studies (STS) that studies the relationships between law, democracy and nanotechnologies. It is analyzed nanotechnologies regulatory experience in Argentina between 2001-2017 by tracing and processing national bills, institutional initiatives and expert discourses committed on the coproduction of a “nano” scientific-legal knowledge. It is identified two major phases. The first phase (2001-2006) leads to the creation by decree of the Argentinian Nanotechnology Foundation (FAN) and includes several critics about it. The second phase (2007-present) begins with the creation of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation Ministry (MINCyT) and adopts a “nano” governance model that combines expert institutionalism with the implementation of global standardization regulation. It is concluded that the instability and polysemic character of nano-objects repositions various types of knowledge as mediators of regulatory and institutional models. This paper aims to contribute: a) in general, to current discussions about the legal modes of stabilizing controversial objects; b) in particular, to describe how legal actors visualize nano-objects in Argentina.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿根廷对纳米技术的监管。纳米物体的多聚性和不稳定性
本文的框架是在科学技术研究(STS)领域,该领域研究法律、民主和纳米技术之间的关系。通过追踪和处理致力于“纳米”科学-法律知识联合生产的国家法案、机构倡议和专家话语,分析了阿根廷2001-2017年纳米技术监管经验。它被确定为两个主要阶段。第一阶段(2001-2006年)导致了阿根廷纳米技术基金会(FAN)的成立,其中包括一些对它的批评。第二阶段(2007年至今)以建立科学、技术和生产创新部(MINCyT)开始,并采用一种“纳米”治理模式,将专家制度主义与全球标准化监管的实施相结合。结论是,纳米对象的不稳定性和多义性将各种类型的知识重新定位为监管和制度模型的中介。本文的目的是:a)总的来说,当前关于稳定争议对象的法律模式的讨论;b)特别是,描述法律行为者如何在阿根廷设想纳米物体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
El Acceso de la Administración Tributaria a la Información Bancaria en Honduras Estudio de la Figura del Holding, su desarrollo en Latinoamérica y presencia en Honduras Reflexiones en torno a la Proporcionalidad y Ponderación de Derechos Aplicados al Caso Artavia Murillo y otros (Fecundación In Vitro) Vs. Costa Rica Derechos Humanos: Coercibilidad de tratados, Educación, Estado de Derecho y Democracia RETROACTIVIDAD DE LA LEY PENAL MAS FAVORABLE (En Honduras una cuestión de justicia constitucional)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1