Increasing Biodiversity and Land-Use Efficiency Through Pea (Pisum aestivum)-Canola (Brassica napus) Intercropping (Peaola)

IF 2.1 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE Frontiers in soil science Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.3389/fsoil.2022.818862
Isaac J. Madsen, J. Parks, M. Friesen, R. E. Clark
{"title":"Increasing Biodiversity and Land-Use Efficiency Through Pea (Pisum aestivum)-Canola (Brassica napus) Intercropping (Peaola)","authors":"Isaac J. Madsen, J. Parks, M. Friesen, R. E. Clark","doi":"10.3389/fsoil.2022.818862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intercropping is an ancient agricultural management practice quickly re-gaining interest in mechanized agricultural systems. Mechanized management practices have led to a decreased biodiversity at the macro- and micro-fauna levels. These agricultural practices have also resulted in the degradation of soil and long-term inefficiencies in land, water, and nutrients. The inland Pacific Northwest (iPNW) of the United States of America is a wheat-dominated cropping system. The integration of winter and spring legumes and oilseeds has improved the biodiversity and nutrient-use efficiency of the cropping systems. This article examines the feasibility of pea-canola (peaola) intercropping in dryland production systems of the iPNW. In two site years, small plot peaola trials were established near Davenport, WA. Overall, the land equivalence ratio (LER) of peaola was found to be 1.46, showing an increase in efficiency of the system. Increasing the N fertilizer application rates did not affect peaola yield, indicating that peaola has low demand for N inputs. The effects of peaola on insects and bacterial diversity were examined on replicated large scale strip trials. Peaola was found to have significantly greater numbers of beneficial insects than the monoculture controls. There were no significant differences between the diversity of the soil bacterial communities found in peaola vs. pea and canola monocultures. However, we found that the strict core soil bacterial microbiome of peaola was larger than the monocultures and included core members from both the canola and pea soil microbiomes. In conclusion, the widespread adoption of peaola would likely increase the biodiversity and increase the land use efficiency of dryland production systems in the iPNW.","PeriodicalId":73107,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in soil science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in soil science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2022.818862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Intercropping is an ancient agricultural management practice quickly re-gaining interest in mechanized agricultural systems. Mechanized management practices have led to a decreased biodiversity at the macro- and micro-fauna levels. These agricultural practices have also resulted in the degradation of soil and long-term inefficiencies in land, water, and nutrients. The inland Pacific Northwest (iPNW) of the United States of America is a wheat-dominated cropping system. The integration of winter and spring legumes and oilseeds has improved the biodiversity and nutrient-use efficiency of the cropping systems. This article examines the feasibility of pea-canola (peaola) intercropping in dryland production systems of the iPNW. In two site years, small plot peaola trials were established near Davenport, WA. Overall, the land equivalence ratio (LER) of peaola was found to be 1.46, showing an increase in efficiency of the system. Increasing the N fertilizer application rates did not affect peaola yield, indicating that peaola has low demand for N inputs. The effects of peaola on insects and bacterial diversity were examined on replicated large scale strip trials. Peaola was found to have significantly greater numbers of beneficial insects than the monoculture controls. There were no significant differences between the diversity of the soil bacterial communities found in peaola vs. pea and canola monocultures. However, we found that the strict core soil bacterial microbiome of peaola was larger than the monocultures and included core members from both the canola and pea soil microbiomes. In conclusion, the widespread adoption of peaola would likely increase the biodiversity and increase the land use efficiency of dryland production systems in the iPNW.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
豌豆(Pisum aestivum)-油菜(Brassica napus)间作提高生物多样性和土地利用效率
间作是一种古老的农业管理实践,在机械化农业系统中迅速引起人们的兴趣。机械化管理做法导致宏观和微观动物群层面的生物多样性下降。这些农业做法还导致土壤退化,土地、水和养分长期低效。美利坚合众国西北太平洋内陆(iPNW)是一个以小麦为主的种植系统。冬春季豆类和油籽的结合提高了种植系统的生物多样性和养分利用效率。本文探讨了在iPNW旱地生产系统中进行豌豆-油菜(peaola)间作的可行性。在两年的时间里,在华盛顿州达文波特附近建立了小地块泥炭地试验。总体而言,泥炭地的土地当量比(LER)为1.46,表明该系统的效率有所提高。增加氮肥施用量不影响泥炭地产量,说明泥炭地对氮投入的需求较低。在重复的大规模条带试验中检验了泥炭对昆虫和细菌多样性的影响。研究发现,与单一栽培对照相比,皮奥拉的有益昆虫数量明显更多。在泥炭地与豌豆和油菜单一栽培中发现的土壤细菌群落多样性之间没有显著差异。然而,我们发现,泥炭地严格的核心土壤细菌微生物组比单一栽培的大,并且包括来自油菜和豌豆土壤微生物组的核心成员。总之,泥炭地的广泛采用可能会增加iPNW旱地生产系统的生物多样性和土地利用效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainable soil and land management: a systems-oriented overview of scientific literature Improving a regional peat thickness map using soil apparent electrical conductivity measurements at the field-scale Extended soil surface drying triggered by subsurface drip irrigation decouples carbon and nitrogen cycles and alters microbiome composition Mitigating CO2 emissions from cultivated peatlands: Efficiency of straws and wood chips applications in maintaining carbon stock in two contrasting soils The role of soil ecosystem services in the circular bioeconomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1